Variation in Medicaid and commercial coverage of cell and gene therapies

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Molly T. Beinfeld , Julia A. Rucker , Nola B. Jenkins , Lucas A. de Breed , James D. Chambers
{"title":"Variation in Medicaid and commercial coverage of cell and gene therapies","authors":"Molly T. Beinfeld ,&nbsp;Julia A. Rucker ,&nbsp;Nola B. Jenkins ,&nbsp;Lucas A. de Breed ,&nbsp;James D. Chambers","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Growth in the availability of cell and gene therapies (CGTs) promises significant innovation in the treatment of serious diseases, but the high cost and one-time administration of CGTs has also raised concern about strain on health plan budgets and inequity in access. We used coverage information from the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage (SPEC) database for 18 large commercial health plans in the US and information from state Medicaid websites to examine variation in coverage of 11 CGTs in August 2021. We found that US commercial and Medicaid health plans imposed restrictions in 53.5 % and 68.3 % of their coverage policies for the 11 included CGTs, respectively. In addition, we identified significant variation in access to CGTs across commercial plans and across Medicaid plans. Coverage restrictions for certain CGTs were more common than others; clinical requirements were often (but not always) consistent with the inclusion criteria for the clinical trial central to the drug’s approval. We conclude that there is variation in access to CGTs, creating differential patient access.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229623000151/pdfft?md5=0e2ff485bbf69751b569aff26579e612&pid=1-s2.0-S2590229623000151-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229623000151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growth in the availability of cell and gene therapies (CGTs) promises significant innovation in the treatment of serious diseases, but the high cost and one-time administration of CGTs has also raised concern about strain on health plan budgets and inequity in access. We used coverage information from the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage (SPEC) database for 18 large commercial health plans in the US and information from state Medicaid websites to examine variation in coverage of 11 CGTs in August 2021. We found that US commercial and Medicaid health plans imposed restrictions in 53.5 % and 68.3 % of their coverage policies for the 11 included CGTs, respectively. In addition, we identified significant variation in access to CGTs across commercial plans and across Medicaid plans. Coverage restrictions for certain CGTs were more common than others; clinical requirements were often (but not always) consistent with the inclusion criteria for the clinical trial central to the drug’s approval. We conclude that there is variation in access to CGTs, creating differential patient access.

医疗补助的变化和细胞和基因治疗的商业覆盖
细胞和基因疗法(cgt)可得性的增长有望在严重疾病的治疗方面带来重大创新,但cgt的高成本和一次性管理也引起了对卫生计划预算紧张和获取不公平的关注。我们使用来自Tufts医学中心特种药物证据和覆盖(SPEC)数据库的美国18个大型商业健康计划的覆盖信息和来自州医疗补助网站的信息来检查2021年8月11个cgt覆盖范围的变化。我们发现,美国商业和医疗补助计划分别在53.5%和68.3%的11个包括cgt的覆盖政策中施加了限制。此外,我们还发现在商业计划和医疗补助计划中获得cgt的显著差异。某些cgt的覆盖限制比其他cgt更为普遍;临床要求通常(但并不总是)与药物批准的临床试验中心的纳入标准一致。我们的结论是,在获得cgt方面存在差异,造成了患者的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信