Between welcome culture and border fence: A dataset on the European refugee crisis in German newspaper reports.

IF 1.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Nico Blokker, André Blessing, Erenay Dayanik, Jonas Kuhn, Sebastian Padó, Gabriella Lapesa
{"title":"Between welcome culture and border fence: A dataset on the European refugee crisis in German newspaper reports.","authors":"Nico Blokker,&nbsp;André Blessing,&nbsp;Erenay Dayanik,&nbsp;Jonas Kuhn,&nbsp;Sebastian Padó,&nbsp;Gabriella Lapesa","doi":"10.1007/s10579-023-09641-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Newspaper reports provide a rich source of information on the unfolding of public debates, which can serve as basis for inquiry in political science. Such debates are often triggered by critical events, which attract public attention and incite the reactions of political actors: crisis sparks the debate. However, due to the challenges of reliable annotation and modeling, few large-scale datasets with high-quality annotation are available. This paper introduces <i>DebateNet2.0</i>, which traces the political discourse on the 2015 European refugee crisis in the German quality newspaper <i>taz</i>. The core units of our annotation are political claims (requests for specific actions to be taken) and the actors who advance them (politicians, parties, etc.). Our contribution is twofold. First, we document and release <i>DebateNet2.0</i> along with its companion R package, mardyR. Second, we outline and apply a Discourse Network Analysis (DNA) to <i>DebateNet2.0</i>, comparing two crucial moments of the policy debate on the \"refugee crisis\": the migration flux through the Mediterranean in April/May and the one along the Balkan route in September/October. We guide the reader through the methods involved in constructing a discourse network from a newspaper, demonstrating that there is not one single discourse network for the German migration debate, but multiple ones, depending on the research question through the associated choices regarding political actors, policy fields and time spans.</p>","PeriodicalId":49927,"journal":{"name":"Language Resources and Evaluation","volume":"57 1","pages":"121-153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924208/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Resources and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-023-09641-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Newspaper reports provide a rich source of information on the unfolding of public debates, which can serve as basis for inquiry in political science. Such debates are often triggered by critical events, which attract public attention and incite the reactions of political actors: crisis sparks the debate. However, due to the challenges of reliable annotation and modeling, few large-scale datasets with high-quality annotation are available. This paper introduces DebateNet2.0, which traces the political discourse on the 2015 European refugee crisis in the German quality newspaper taz. The core units of our annotation are political claims (requests for specific actions to be taken) and the actors who advance them (politicians, parties, etc.). Our contribution is twofold. First, we document and release DebateNet2.0 along with its companion R package, mardyR. Second, we outline and apply a Discourse Network Analysis (DNA) to DebateNet2.0, comparing two crucial moments of the policy debate on the "refugee crisis": the migration flux through the Mediterranean in April/May and the one along the Balkan route in September/October. We guide the reader through the methods involved in constructing a discourse network from a newspaper, demonstrating that there is not one single discourse network for the German migration debate, but multiple ones, depending on the research question through the associated choices regarding political actors, policy fields and time spans.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在欢迎文化和边境围栏之间:德国报纸报道的欧洲难民危机数据集。
报纸报道提供了有关公开辩论展开的丰富信息来源,可以作为政治学研究的基础。这种辩论往往是由关键事件引发的,这些事件吸引了公众的注意力,并激起了政治行动者的反应:危机引发了辩论。然而,由于可靠标注和建模的挑战,具有高质量标注的大规模数据集很少。本文介绍了DebateNet2.0,它追溯了2015年德国优质报纸《taz》上关于欧洲难民危机的政治话语。我们注释的核心单元是政治主张(要采取的具体行动的请求)和推动它们的行动者(政治家、政党等)。我们的贡献是双重的。首先,我们编制文档并发布DebateNet2.0及其配套的R包mardyR。其次,我们在DebateNet2.0上概述并应用了话语网络分析(DNA),比较了关于“难民危机”的政策辩论的两个关键时刻:4月/ 5月通过地中海的移民潮和9月/ 10月沿着巴尔干路线的移民潮。我们通过从报纸上构建话语网络的方法来指导读者,证明德国移民辩论不是一个单一的话语网络,而是多个话语网络,这取决于研究问题,通过与政治行为者、政策领域和时间跨度相关的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language Resources and Evaluation
Language Resources and Evaluation 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
55
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Language Resources and Evaluation is the first publication devoted to the acquisition, creation, annotation, and use of language resources, together with methods for evaluation of resources, technologies, and applications. Language resources include language data and descriptions in machine readable form used to assist and augment language processing applications, such as written or spoken corpora and lexica, multimodal resources, grammars, terminology or domain specific databases and dictionaries, ontologies, multimedia databases, etc., as well as basic software tools for their acquisition, preparation, annotation, management, customization, and use. Evaluation of language resources concerns assessing the state-of-the-art for a given technology, comparing different approaches to a given problem, assessing the availability of resources and technologies for a given application, benchmarking, and assessing system usability and user satisfaction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信