FACILITATE: A real-world, multicenter, prospective study investigating the utility of a rapid, fully automated real-time PCR assay versus local reference methods for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor variants in NSCLC.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Anke Behnke, Anne Cayre, Giovanna De Maglio, Giuseppe Giannini, Lionel Habran, Marina Tarsitano, Massimiliano Chetta, David Cappellen, Alexandra Lespagnol, Cecile Le Naoures, Gabriella Massazza, Annarita Destro, Irina Bonzheim, Achim Rau, Achim Battmann, Bettina Kah, Emmanuel Watkin, Michael Hummel
{"title":"FACILITATE: A real-world, multicenter, prospective study investigating the utility of a rapid, fully automated real-time PCR assay versus local reference methods for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor variants in NSCLC.","authors":"Anke Behnke,&nbsp;Anne Cayre,&nbsp;Giovanna De Maglio,&nbsp;Giuseppe Giannini,&nbsp;Lionel Habran,&nbsp;Marina Tarsitano,&nbsp;Massimiliano Chetta,&nbsp;David Cappellen,&nbsp;Alexandra Lespagnol,&nbsp;Cecile Le Naoures,&nbsp;Gabriella Massazza,&nbsp;Annarita Destro,&nbsp;Irina Bonzheim,&nbsp;Achim Rau,&nbsp;Achim Battmann,&nbsp;Bettina Kah,&nbsp;Emmanuel Watkin,&nbsp;Michael Hummel","doi":"10.3389/pore.2023.1610707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>EGFR</i>) variants is essential for informing treatment decisions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Automated diagnostic workflows may allow more streamlined initiation of targeted treatments, where appropriate, while comprehensive variant analysis is ongoing. FACILITATE, a real-world, prospective, multicenter, European study, evaluated performance and analytical turnaround time of the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test compared with local reference methods. Sixteen sites obtained formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsy samples with ≥ 10% neoplastic cells from patients with NSCLC. Consecutive 5 μm sections from patient samples were tested for clinically relevant NSCLC-associated <i>EGFR</i> variants using the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test and local reference methods; performance (concordance) and analytical turnaround time were compared. Between January 2019 and November 2020, 1,474 parallel analyses were conducted. Overall percentage agreement was 97.7% [<i>n</i> = 1,418; 95% confidence interval (CI): 96.8-98.3], positive agreement, 87.4% (<i>n</i> = 182; 95% CI: 81.8-91.4) and negative agreement, 99.2% (<i>n</i> = 1,236; 95% CI: 98.5-99.6). There were 38 (2.6%) discordant cases. Ninety percent of results were returned with an analytical turnaround time of within 1 week using the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test versus ∼22 days using reference methods. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test performed well versus local methods and had shorter analytical turnaround time. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test can thus support application of personalized medicine in NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19981,"journal":{"name":"Pathology & Oncology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927408/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology & Oncology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2023.1610707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Accurate testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) variants is essential for informing treatment decisions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Automated diagnostic workflows may allow more streamlined initiation of targeted treatments, where appropriate, while comprehensive variant analysis is ongoing. FACILITATE, a real-world, prospective, multicenter, European study, evaluated performance and analytical turnaround time of the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test compared with local reference methods. Sixteen sites obtained formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsy samples with ≥ 10% neoplastic cells from patients with NSCLC. Consecutive 5 μm sections from patient samples were tested for clinically relevant NSCLC-associated EGFR variants using the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test and local reference methods; performance (concordance) and analytical turnaround time were compared. Between January 2019 and November 2020, 1,474 parallel analyses were conducted. Overall percentage agreement was 97.7% [n = 1,418; 95% confidence interval (CI): 96.8-98.3], positive agreement, 87.4% (n = 182; 95% CI: 81.8-91.4) and negative agreement, 99.2% (n = 1,236; 95% CI: 98.5-99.6). There were 38 (2.6%) discordant cases. Ninety percent of results were returned with an analytical turnaround time of within 1 week using the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test versus ∼22 days using reference methods. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test performed well versus local methods and had shorter analytical turnaround time. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test can thus support application of personalized medicine in NSCLC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

便利:一项真实世界,多中心,前瞻性研究,调查快速,全自动实时PCR检测方法与局部参考方法在检测非小细胞肺癌表皮生长因子受体变异方面的实用性。
准确检测表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)变异对于非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗决策至关重要。在进行全面变异分析的同时,自动化诊断工作流程可以在适当的情况下简化靶向治疗的启动。便利,一个真实世界,前瞻性,多中心,欧洲研究,评估性能和分析周转时间的Idylla™EGFR突变测试与当地参考方法进行比较。16个站点获得福尔马林固定石蜡包埋活检样本,≥10%的肿瘤细胞来自NSCLC患者。使用Idylla™EGFR突变测试和当地参考方法,对患者样本连续5 μm切片进行临床相关的非小细胞肺癌相关EGFR变异检测;性能(一致性)和分析周转时间进行比较。2019年1月至2020年11月期间,进行了1474次平行分析。总体一致百分比为97.7% [n = 1418;95%可信区间(CI): 96.8-98.3],阳性一致性为87.4% (n = 182;95% CI: 81.8-91.4),否定一致性为99.2% (n = 1,236;95% ci: 98.5-99.6)。不一致病例38例(2.6%)。使用Idylla™EGFR突变测试,90%的结果在1周内返回,而使用参考方法则为22天。与本地方法相比,Idylla™EGFR突变测试表现良好,并且分析周转时间更短。因此,Idylla™EGFR突变检测可以支持在非小细胞肺癌中应用个性化医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pathology & Oncology Research (POR) is an interdisciplinary Journal at the interface of pathology and oncology including the preclinical and translational research, diagnostics and therapy. Furthermore, POR is an international forum for the rapid communication of reviews, original research, critical and topical reports with excellence and novelty. Published quarterly, POR is dedicated to keeping scientists informed of developments on the selected biomedical fields bridging the gap between basic research and clinical medicine. It is a special aim for POR to promote pathological and oncological publishing activity of colleagues in the Central and East European region. The journal will be of interest to pathologists, and a broad range of experimental and clinical oncologists, and related experts. POR is supported by an acknowledged international advisory board and the Arányi Fundation for modern pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信