Elective adhesiolysis for chronic abdominal pain reduces long-term risk of adhesive small bowel obstruction.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Barend A W van den Beukel, Masja K Toneman, Fleur van Veelen, Marjolein Blusse van Oud-Alblas, Koen van Dongen, Martijn W J Stommel, Harry van Goor, Richard P G Ten Broek
{"title":"Elective adhesiolysis for chronic abdominal pain reduces long-term risk of adhesive small bowel obstruction.","authors":"Barend A W van den Beukel, Masja K Toneman, Fleur van Veelen, Marjolein Blusse van Oud-Alblas, Koen van Dongen, Martijn W J Stommel, Harry van Goor, Richard P G Ten Broek","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00477-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selected patients with adhesion-related chronic abdominal pain can be treated effectively by adhesiolysis with the application of adhesion barriers. These patients might also have an increased risk to develop adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO). It is unknown how frequently these patients develop ASBO, and how elective adhesiolysis for pain impacts the risk of ASBO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with adhesion-related chronic pain were included in this cohort study with long-term follow-up. The diagnosis of adhesions was confirmed using CineMRI. The decision for operative treatment of adhesions was made by shared agreement based on the correlation of complaints with CineMRI findings. The primary outcome was the 5-years incidence of readmission for ASBO. Incidence was compared between patients with elective adhesiolysis and those treated non-operatively and between patients with and without previous ASBO. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for ASBO. Secondary outcomes included reoperation for ASBO and self-reported pain and other abdominal symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 122 patients were included, 69 patients underwent elective adhesiolysis. Thirty patients in both groups had previous episodes of ASBO in history. During 5-year follow-up, the readmission rate for ASBO was 6.5% after elective adhesiolysis compared to 26.9% after non-operative treatment (p = 0.012). These percentages were 13.3% compared to 40% in the subgroup of patients with previous episodes of ASBO (p = 0.039). In multivariable analysis, elective adhesiolysis was associated with a decreased risk of readmission for ASBO with an odds ratio of 0.21 (95% CI 0.07-0.65), the risk was increased in patients with previous episodes with a odds ratio of 19.2 (95% CI 2.5-144.4). There was no difference between the groups in the prevalence of self-reported abdominal pain. However, in surgically treated patients the impact of pain on daily activities was lower, and the incidence of other symptoms was lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than one in four patients with chronic adhesion-related pain develop episodes of ASBO when treated non-operatively. Elective adhesiolysis reduces the incidence of ASBO in patients with chronic adhesion-related symptoms, both in patients with and without previous episodes of ASBO in history. Trial registration The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov under NCT01236625.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00477-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Selected patients with adhesion-related chronic abdominal pain can be treated effectively by adhesiolysis with the application of adhesion barriers. These patients might also have an increased risk to develop adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO). It is unknown how frequently these patients develop ASBO, and how elective adhesiolysis for pain impacts the risk of ASBO.

Methods: Patients with adhesion-related chronic pain were included in this cohort study with long-term follow-up. The diagnosis of adhesions was confirmed using CineMRI. The decision for operative treatment of adhesions was made by shared agreement based on the correlation of complaints with CineMRI findings. The primary outcome was the 5-years incidence of readmission for ASBO. Incidence was compared between patients with elective adhesiolysis and those treated non-operatively and between patients with and without previous ASBO. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for ASBO. Secondary outcomes included reoperation for ASBO and self-reported pain and other abdominal symptoms.

Results: A total of 122 patients were included, 69 patients underwent elective adhesiolysis. Thirty patients in both groups had previous episodes of ASBO in history. During 5-year follow-up, the readmission rate for ASBO was 6.5% after elective adhesiolysis compared to 26.9% after non-operative treatment (p = 0.012). These percentages were 13.3% compared to 40% in the subgroup of patients with previous episodes of ASBO (p = 0.039). In multivariable analysis, elective adhesiolysis was associated with a decreased risk of readmission for ASBO with an odds ratio of 0.21 (95% CI 0.07-0.65), the risk was increased in patients with previous episodes with a odds ratio of 19.2 (95% CI 2.5-144.4). There was no difference between the groups in the prevalence of self-reported abdominal pain. However, in surgically treated patients the impact of pain on daily activities was lower, and the incidence of other symptoms was lower.

Conclusion: More than one in four patients with chronic adhesion-related pain develop episodes of ASBO when treated non-operatively. Elective adhesiolysis reduces the incidence of ASBO in patients with chronic adhesion-related symptoms, both in patients with and without previous episodes of ASBO in history. Trial registration The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov under NCT01236625.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

针对慢性腹痛的选择性粘连溶解术可降低粘连性小肠梗阻的长期风险。
背景:部分粘连相关慢性腹痛患者可通过应用粘连屏障进行粘连溶解获得有效治疗。这些患者发生粘连性小肠梗阻(ASBO)的风险也可能增加。目前尚不清楚这些患者发生粘连性小肠阻塞的频率,也不清楚因疼痛而进行选择性粘连溶解对发生粘连性小肠阻塞的风险有何影响:方法:这项队列研究纳入了与粘连相关的慢性疼痛患者,并进行了长期随访。粘连的诊断是通过 CineMRI 确诊的。根据主诉与 CineMRI 检查结果的相关性,共同商定是否对粘连进行手术治疗。主要结果是5年内因ASBO再次入院的发生率。比较了选择性粘连溶解和非手术治疗的患者之间的发生率,以及既往有和既往没有 ASBO 的患者之间的发生率。进行了单变量和多变量考克斯回归分析,以确定ASBO的预测因素。次要结果包括因ASBO再次手术以及自我报告的疼痛和其他腹部症状:共纳入122名患者,其中69名患者接受了选择性粘连溶解术。两组患者中均有30人曾有过ASBO病史。在为期5年的随访中,选择性粘连分解术后因ASBO再次入院的比例为6.5%,而非手术治疗后为26.9%(P = 0.012)。在曾发生过 ASBO 的患者亚组中,这一比例为 13.3%,而在曾发生过 ASBO 的患者亚组中,这一比例为 40%(p = 0.039)。在多变量分析中,选择性粘连溶解术与ASBO再入院风险的降低有关,几率比为0.21(95% CI 0.07-0.65),而在既往发作过ASBO的患者中,风险增加,几率比为19.2(95% CI 2.5-144.4)。两组患者自我报告的腹痛发生率没有差异。然而,手术治疗患者的疼痛对日常活动的影响较小,其他症状的发生率也较低:结论:在接受非手术治疗的慢性粘连相关疼痛患者中,每四人中就有一人以上会出现 ASBO 发作。选择性粘连溶解术可降低慢性粘连相关症状患者的ASBO发病率,无论患者是否曾有过ASBO发作史。试验注册 该研究已在Clinicaltrials.gov网站注册,注册号为NCT01236625。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
World Journal of Emergency Surgery EMERGENCY MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Emergency Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal covering all facets of clinical and basic research in traumatic and non-traumatic emergency surgery and related fields. Topics include emergency surgery, acute care surgery, trauma surgery, intensive care, trauma management, and resuscitation, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信