One hundred laparoscopic myomectomies with ultrasonic energy: surgical evaluation of a new energy source

Nelson H. Stringer
{"title":"One hundred laparoscopic myomectomies with ultrasonic energy: surgical evaluation of a new energy source","authors":"Nelson H. Stringer","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.1998.00161.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the surgical efficiency of ultrasonic energy for laparoscopic myomectomies through review of the dissection and haemostatic capabilities of the energy source; the pregnancy results after surgery; formation of uterine fistulas and postoperative adhesions, and energy-related difficulties and complications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective chart review.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>One surgeon, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients</h3>\n \n <p>100 women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomata.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interventions</h3>\n \n <p>100 consecutive laparoscopic myomectomies were performed between April 1993 and May 1997. Ultrasonic cutting and coagulation (Ultrasonic Scalpel) was used on all cases for dissection of myomas from the myometrium.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The indications for surgery were: menometrorrhagia (44%), chronic pain (29%) and increasing uterine size (27%), and 99 procedures were completed laparoscopically. One procedure was converted to an open laparotomy to remove a broken needle fragment from the Endostitch<sup>TM</sup> (1% conversion rate). No energy-related complications occurred. A total of 320 myomas were removed laparoscopically from 99 patients. Dissection and achievment of haemostasis was easy and rapid with all types of myomas. To date, 10 patients have experienced 12 pregnancies. No fistulas or uterine dehiscence have occurred. A total of 26 patients had second-look evaluations, and 65% of these were clinically free of adhesions (grade 0 or grade 1).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>When compared with published results of laparoscopic myomectomies performed with lasers and electrosurgical instruments, ultrasonic energy demonstrated equal dissection and haemostatic capabilities without the risks of toxic smoke, burns and thermal injuries. Ultrasonic energy is an effective energy source for laparoscopic myomectomies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"7 2","pages":"85-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.1998.00161.x","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.1998.00161.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the surgical efficiency of ultrasonic energy for laparoscopic myomectomies through review of the dissection and haemostatic capabilities of the energy source; the pregnancy results after surgery; formation of uterine fistulas and postoperative adhesions, and energy-related difficulties and complications.

Design

Retrospective chart review.

Setting

One surgeon, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois.

Patients

100 women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomata.

Interventions

100 consecutive laparoscopic myomectomies were performed between April 1993 and May 1997. Ultrasonic cutting and coagulation (Ultrasonic Scalpel) was used on all cases for dissection of myomas from the myometrium.

Results

The indications for surgery were: menometrorrhagia (44%), chronic pain (29%) and increasing uterine size (27%), and 99 procedures were completed laparoscopically. One procedure was converted to an open laparotomy to remove a broken needle fragment from the EndostitchTM (1% conversion rate). No energy-related complications occurred. A total of 320 myomas were removed laparoscopically from 99 patients. Dissection and achievment of haemostasis was easy and rapid with all types of myomas. To date, 10 patients have experienced 12 pregnancies. No fistulas or uterine dehiscence have occurred. A total of 26 patients had second-look evaluations, and 65% of these were clinically free of adhesions (grade 0 or grade 1).

Conclusions

When compared with published results of laparoscopic myomectomies performed with lasers and electrosurgical instruments, ultrasonic energy demonstrated equal dissection and haemostatic capabilities without the risks of toxic smoke, burns and thermal injuries. Ultrasonic energy is an effective energy source for laparoscopic myomectomies.

超声能量腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术一百例:新能源的手术评价
目的评价超声能量在腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术中的应用效果,探讨超声能量在子宫肌瘤切除术中的应用价值。手术后妊娠结果;子宫瘘的形成和术后粘连,以及能量相关的困难和并发症。设计回顾图表审查。一名外科医生和妇产科,拉什医学院,芝加哥,伊利诺斯州。患者100例有症状性子宫平滑肌瘤。干预措施:1993年4月至1997年5月间,连续进行了100例腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术。所有病例均采用超声切割和凝固(超声手术刀)从肌层剥离肌瘤。结果手术指征为:月经过多(44%)、慢性疼痛(29%)、子宫增大(27%),腹腔镜下完成99例手术。其中一项手术转为开腹手术,从EndostitchTM上取出破损的针片(转换率为1%)。无能量相关并发症发生。99例患者共320例肌瘤经腹腔镜切除。所有类型的肌瘤均能快速、简便地分离和止血。迄今为止,已有10名患者经历了12次怀孕。未发生瘘管或子宫开裂。共有26名患者进行了二次评估,其中65%的患者临床无粘连(0级或1级)。结论与已发表的激光和电手术器械腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的结果相比,超声能量显示出相同的解剖和止血能力,没有有毒烟雾、烧伤和热损伤的风险。超声能量是腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的有效能量来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信