Open tibial shaft fractures: treatment patterns in sub-Saharan Africa.

{"title":"Open tibial shaft fractures: treatment patterns in sub-Saharan Africa.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Open tibial shaft fractures are a leading cause of disability worldwide, particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Guidelines for these injuries have been developed in many high-income countries, but treatment patterns across Africa are less well-documented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was distributed to orthopaedic service providers across sub-Saharan Africa. Information gathered included surgeon and practice setting demographics and treatment preferences for open tibial shaft fractures across 3 domains: initial debridement, antibiotic administration, and fracture stabilization. Responses were grouped according to country income level and were compared between LMICs and upper middle-income countries (UMICs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses from 261 survey participants from 31 countries were analyzed, with 80% of respondents practicing in LMICs. Most respondents were male practicing orthopaedic surgeons at a tertiary referral hospital. For all respondents, initial debridement occurred most frequently in the operating room (OR) within the first 24 hours, but LMIC surgeons more frequently reported delays due to equipment availability, treatment cost, and OR availability. Compared with their UMIC counterparts, LMIC surgeons less frequently confirmed tetanus vaccination status and more frequently used extended courses of postoperative antibiotics. LMIC surgeons reported lower rates of using internal fixation, particularly for high-grade and late-presenting fractures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study describes management characteristics of open tibial shaft fractures in sub-Saharan Africa. Notably, there were reported differences in wound management, antibiotic administration, and fracture stabilization between LMICs and UMICs. These findings suggest opportunities for standardization where evidence is available and further research where it is lacking.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>VI-Cross-Sectional Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"6 2","pages":"e228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5c/5b/otai-6-e228.PMC10005832.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Open tibial shaft fractures are a leading cause of disability worldwide, particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Guidelines for these injuries have been developed in many high-income countries, but treatment patterns across Africa are less well-documented.

Methods: A survey was distributed to orthopaedic service providers across sub-Saharan Africa. Information gathered included surgeon and practice setting demographics and treatment preferences for open tibial shaft fractures across 3 domains: initial debridement, antibiotic administration, and fracture stabilization. Responses were grouped according to country income level and were compared between LMICs and upper middle-income countries (UMICs).

Results: Responses from 261 survey participants from 31 countries were analyzed, with 80% of respondents practicing in LMICs. Most respondents were male practicing orthopaedic surgeons at a tertiary referral hospital. For all respondents, initial debridement occurred most frequently in the operating room (OR) within the first 24 hours, but LMIC surgeons more frequently reported delays due to equipment availability, treatment cost, and OR availability. Compared with their UMIC counterparts, LMIC surgeons less frequently confirmed tetanus vaccination status and more frequently used extended courses of postoperative antibiotics. LMIC surgeons reported lower rates of using internal fixation, particularly for high-grade and late-presenting fractures.

Conclusions: This study describes management characteristics of open tibial shaft fractures in sub-Saharan Africa. Notably, there were reported differences in wound management, antibiotic administration, and fracture stabilization between LMICs and UMICs. These findings suggest opportunities for standardization where evidence is available and further research where it is lacking.

Level of evidence: VI-Cross-Sectional Study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

开放性胫骨骨干骨折:撒哈拉以南非洲的治疗模式。
目的:开放性胫骨干骨折是全世界残疾的主要原因,尤其是在中低收入国家。许多高收入国家已经制定了这些损伤的指导方针,但非洲各地的治疗模式记录较少。方法:向撒哈拉以南非洲的整形外科服务提供者分发了一项调查。收集的信息包括外科医生和执业机构对开放性胫骨干骨折的人口统计数据和治疗偏好,包括3个领域:初始清创术、抗生素给药和骨折稳定。根据国家收入水平对答复进行分组,并在LMIC和中上收入国家(UMIC)之间进行比较。结果:分析了来自31个国家的261名调查参与者的答复,其中80%的受访者在LMIC执业。大多数受访者是在三级转诊医院执业的男性整形外科医生。对于所有受访者来说,最初的清创术在最初的24小时内最频繁地发生在手术室(OR),但LMIC外科医生更频繁地报告由于设备可用性、治疗成本和OR可用性而延迟。与UMIC同行相比,LMIC外科医生较少确认破伤风疫苗接种状态,更频繁地使用延长疗程的术后抗生素。LMIC外科医生报告称,内固定的使用率较低,尤其是对高级别和晚期骨折。结论:本研究描述了撒哈拉以南非洲开放性胫骨干骨折的治疗特点。值得注意的是,LMIC和UMIC在伤口管理、抗生素给药和骨折稳定性方面存在差异。这些发现表明,在有证据的地方有机会进行标准化,在缺乏证据的地方则有机会进行进一步研究。证据水平:VI横断面研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信