The Psychological Space of Professionals' Trust and Distrust in Socio-Technical Systems.

IF 1.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Anna Yu Akimova, Aleksander A Oboznov
{"title":"The Psychological Space of Professionals' Trust and Distrust in Socio-Technical Systems.","authors":"Anna Yu Akimova,&nbsp;Aleksander A Oboznov","doi":"10.11621/pir.2022.0102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The spatial aspect of professionals' trust and distrust in socio-technical systems has not been sufficiently explored. The study of its structure, criteria for spatial distribution, and interrelationships of elements is of both scientific and practical interest.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform a comparative analysis of the trust and distrust experienced by professional operators in a socio-technical system of subject-subject and subject-object interactions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This work is based on A.B. Kupreychenko's methodological approach to studying trust and distrust in socio-technical systems, adapted by the authors to the railway transport system in Russia. The subjects were 86 locomotive crew members. The main focus was on their trust/distrust in the operation of the socio-technical (railway transport) system, including their workmates, managers, and themselves, as well as the technical objects they operate (locomotives), manufacturers of railway equipment, and conditions of its operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors identified two relatively independent groups of indicators of trust/distrust in subject-subject and subject-object interactions. Trust in the elements of subject-subject interactions (involving workmates, managers, and the study participants themselves as specialists) was reliably higher than their trust in the elements of subject-object interactions (technical objects, manufacturers of railway equipment, and conditions of its operation). The correlations between trust and distrust in the elements of the socio-technical system were positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trust and distrust perform the functions of integrating/differentiating elements of a socio-technical system according to their predictability in various operating conditions. The degree of trust/distrust in the system elements and their \"location\" in the space of trust/distrust are important when professionals make decisions in the course of performing professional actions. The results of the study can be used for designing socio-technical systems to increase the predictability of their operation in unstable conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":44621,"journal":{"name":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","volume":"15 1","pages":"20-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2022.0102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The spatial aspect of professionals' trust and distrust in socio-technical systems has not been sufficiently explored. The study of its structure, criteria for spatial distribution, and interrelationships of elements is of both scientific and practical interest.

Objective: To perform a comparative analysis of the trust and distrust experienced by professional operators in a socio-technical system of subject-subject and subject-object interactions.

Design: This work is based on A.B. Kupreychenko's methodological approach to studying trust and distrust in socio-technical systems, adapted by the authors to the railway transport system in Russia. The subjects were 86 locomotive crew members. The main focus was on their trust/distrust in the operation of the socio-technical (railway transport) system, including their workmates, managers, and themselves, as well as the technical objects they operate (locomotives), manufacturers of railway equipment, and conditions of its operation.

Results: The authors identified two relatively independent groups of indicators of trust/distrust in subject-subject and subject-object interactions. Trust in the elements of subject-subject interactions (involving workmates, managers, and the study participants themselves as specialists) was reliably higher than their trust in the elements of subject-object interactions (technical objects, manufacturers of railway equipment, and conditions of its operation). The correlations between trust and distrust in the elements of the socio-technical system were positive.

Conclusions: Trust and distrust perform the functions of integrating/differentiating elements of a socio-technical system according to their predictability in various operating conditions. The degree of trust/distrust in the system elements and their "location" in the space of trust/distrust are important when professionals make decisions in the course of performing professional actions. The results of the study can be used for designing socio-technical systems to increase the predictability of their operation in unstable conditions.

Abstract Image

社会技术系统中专业人员信任与不信任的心理空间。
背景:专业人员在社会技术系统中的信任和不信任的空间方面尚未得到充分的探索。研究它的结构、空间分布标准和各元素之间的相互关系,既有科学意义,也有实际意义。目的:比较分析在主客体互动和主客体互动的社会技术系统中,专业操作员的信任和不信任体验。设计:这项工作基于A.B. Kupreychenko研究社会技术系统中信任和不信任的方法论方法,作者将其应用于俄罗斯的铁路运输系统。研究对象是86名机车机组人员。主要关注的是他们对社会技术(铁路运输)系统运行的信任/不信任,包括他们的同事、经理和他们自己,以及他们操作的技术对象(机车)、铁路设备制造商及其运行条件。结果:作者确定了主体-主体和主体-客体互动中两组相对独立的信任/不信任指标。对主体-主体互动要素(包括同事、经理和作为专家的研究参与者自己)的信任可靠地高于对主体-客体互动要素(技术对象、铁路设备制造商及其运行条件)的信任。在社会技术系统的要素中,信任和不信任之间的关系是积极的。结论:信任和不信任根据其在各种运行条件下的可预测性,发挥整合/区分社会技术系统要素的功能。当专业人员在执行专业行动的过程中作出决策时,系统要素的信任/不信任程度及其在信任/不信任空间中的“位置”是重要的。研究结果可用于设计社会技术系统,以增加其在不稳定条件下运行的可预测性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2008, the Russian Psychological Society''s Journal «Psychology in Russia: State of the Art» publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognitive, clinical, developmental, social, neuropsychology, psychophysiology, psychology of labor and ergonomics, and methodology of psychological science. Journal''s list of authors comprises prominent scientists, practitioners and experts from leading Russian universities, research institutions, state ministries and private practice. Addressing current challenges of psychology, it also reviews developments in novel areas such as security, sport, and art psychology, as well as psychology of negotiations, cyberspace and virtual reality. The journal builds upon theoretical foundations laid by the works of Vygotsky, Luria and other Russian scientists whose works contributed to shaping the psychological science worldwide, and welcomes international submissions which make major contributions across the range of psychology, especially appreciating the ones conducted in the paradigm of the Russian psychological tradition. It enjoys a wide international readership and features reports of empirical studies, book reviews and theoretical contributions, which aim to further our understanding of psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信