Evaluation of Water Framework Directive metrics to analyse trends in water quality in the Netherlands

P.J.T.M. van Puijenbroek , C.H.M. Evers , F.W. van Gaalen
{"title":"Evaluation of Water Framework Directive metrics to analyse trends in water quality in the Netherlands","authors":"P.J.T.M. van Puijenbroek ,&nbsp;C.H.M. Evers ,&nbsp;F.W. van Gaalen","doi":"10.1016/j.swaqe.2015.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The Water Framework Directive (WFD), implemented in 2000, is the major policy instrument for water quality in the European Union. Its main aim is to homogenise and standardise water quality assessments in all Member States, stimulate </span>water quality improvement<span> and contribute to the management of transboundary water problems. Surface water quality descriptions are a crucial part of the WFD. The first WFD assessment was presented in 2009 and in 2014 a second set of results were available, allowing comparison of the status between both years. The main issue for policymakers is whether the quality has changed over the past years. In this study, two methods are evaluated to examine the differences in surface water quality. The WFD method uses the differences in the percentage of water bodies with a good quality for comparing between both assessments. The time-series method uses the WFD metrics to calculate water quality with all available monitoring data, aggregated to grid cells. The conclusion concerning the WFD method is that the two assessment reports of 2009 and 2014 are too dissimilar in method and standards and therefore not suitable to evaluate changes over time. The time-series method showed a small improvement for </span></span>phytoplankton and macrophytes and no improvement for benthic invertebrates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101194,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability of Water Quality and Ecology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 40-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.swaqe.2015.02.004","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability of Water Quality and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212613915000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The Water Framework Directive (WFD), implemented in 2000, is the major policy instrument for water quality in the European Union. Its main aim is to homogenise and standardise water quality assessments in all Member States, stimulate water quality improvement and contribute to the management of transboundary water problems. Surface water quality descriptions are a crucial part of the WFD. The first WFD assessment was presented in 2009 and in 2014 a second set of results were available, allowing comparison of the status between both years. The main issue for policymakers is whether the quality has changed over the past years. In this study, two methods are evaluated to examine the differences in surface water quality. The WFD method uses the differences in the percentage of water bodies with a good quality for comparing between both assessments. The time-series method uses the WFD metrics to calculate water quality with all available monitoring data, aggregated to grid cells. The conclusion concerning the WFD method is that the two assessment reports of 2009 and 2014 are too dissimilar in method and standards and therefore not suitable to evaluate changes over time. The time-series method showed a small improvement for phytoplankton and macrophytes and no improvement for benthic invertebrates.

评估水框架指令指标,以分析荷兰水质趋势
《水框架指令》(WFD)于2000年实施,是欧盟水质的主要政策工具。其主要目的是使所有会员国的水质评价统一和标准化,促进改善水质,并促进跨界水问题的管理。地表水质量描述是WFD的重要组成部分。2009年发布了第一次世界粮食计划署评估报告,2014年发布了第二组结果,可以对这两年的状况进行比较。政策制定者面临的主要问题是,过去几年的质量是否发生了变化。在这项研究中,评估了两种方法来检查地表水质量的差异。WFD方法使用质量良好的水体百分比的差异来比较两种评估。时间序列方法使用WFD指标计算所有可用监测数据的水质,汇总到网格单元。关于WFD方法的结论是,2009年和2014年的两份评估报告在方法和标准上差异太大,因此不适合评估随时间的变化。时间序列法显示浮游植物和大型植物的改善幅度较小,底栖无脊椎动物没有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信