Comparison of chemical solvents for mitigating CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants

A. Chakma, A.K. Mehrotra, B. Nielsen
{"title":"Comparison of chemical solvents for mitigating CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants","authors":"A. Chakma,&nbsp;A.K. Mehrotra,&nbsp;B. Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/0890-4332(95)90030-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is a growing concern about the effect of greenhouse gases on global warming. Among the many greenhouse gases, CO<sub>2</sub> produced from burning fossil fuels is a major contributor due to the huge volumes emitted into the atmosphere. According to the estimates of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a worldwide reduction in the emission of greenhouse gases by more than 60% is necessary to avert significant global climate changes.</p><p>This paper examines the key issues involved in greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power plants. At the present time, absorption by chemical solvents appears to be best option for the separation of CO<sub>2</sub> from low pressure flue gas streams. The costs of separation and disposal of CO<sub>2</sub> from existing coal fired, air blown boilers are estimated to increase the cost of electricity by about 75%. Therefore, there is a need to optimize the selection of processing solvents and operating parameters to minimize the cost of separation. Increasing the inlet flue gas pressure did not improve mass transfer rates sufficiently to compensate for the higher compression costs. The effects of other process variables were also examined.</p><p>In this work, we have examined the cost effectiveness of six ethanolamine-based solvents. Overall, monoethanolamine (MEA) was found to be the best solvent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100603,"journal":{"name":"Heat Recovery Systems and CHP","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 231-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0890-4332(95)90030-6","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Recovery Systems and CHP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0890433295900306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

There is a growing concern about the effect of greenhouse gases on global warming. Among the many greenhouse gases, CO2 produced from burning fossil fuels is a major contributor due to the huge volumes emitted into the atmosphere. According to the estimates of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a worldwide reduction in the emission of greenhouse gases by more than 60% is necessary to avert significant global climate changes.

This paper examines the key issues involved in greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power plants. At the present time, absorption by chemical solvents appears to be best option for the separation of CO2 from low pressure flue gas streams. The costs of separation and disposal of CO2 from existing coal fired, air blown boilers are estimated to increase the cost of electricity by about 75%. Therefore, there is a need to optimize the selection of processing solvents and operating parameters to minimize the cost of separation. Increasing the inlet flue gas pressure did not improve mass transfer rates sufficiently to compensate for the higher compression costs. The effects of other process variables were also examined.

In this work, we have examined the cost effectiveness of six ethanolamine-based solvents. Overall, monoethanolamine (MEA) was found to be the best solvent.

减少燃煤电厂二氧化碳排放的化学溶剂的比较
人们越来越关注温室气体对全球变暖的影响。在许多温室气体中,燃烧化石燃料产生的二氧化碳是主要的贡献者,因为它大量排放到大气中。根据政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)的估计,要避免全球气候发生重大变化,全球温室气体排放量必须减少60%以上。本文探讨了燃煤电厂温室气体排放的关键问题。目前,化学溶剂的吸收似乎是从低压烟气流中分离CO2的最佳选择。据估计,从现有燃煤、空气锅炉中分离和处理二氧化碳的成本将使电力成本增加约75%。因此,有必要优化选择加工溶剂和操作参数,以尽量减少分离成本。增加进口烟气压力并不能充分提高传质率,以补偿较高的压缩成本。对其他工艺变量的影响也进行了考察。在这项工作中,我们研究了六种乙醇胺基溶剂的成本效益。综上所述,单乙醇胺(MEA)是最佳溶剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信