Endoscopic Biopsy by Mucosal Incision for Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors

Toru Okuzono, Toshiyuki Mishima, Adel Badran, Hiroyuki Mizuno, Yusuke Miyashita, Hidetaka Hamamoto, Shun Sato, Naoto Miyake, Masato Nakahori, Akimichi Chonan
{"title":"Endoscopic Biopsy by Mucosal Incision for Upper Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors","authors":"Toru Okuzono,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Mishima,&nbsp;Adel Badran,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Mizuno,&nbsp;Yusuke Miyashita,&nbsp;Hidetaka Hamamoto,&nbsp;Shun Sato,&nbsp;Naoto Miyake,&nbsp;Masato Nakahori,&nbsp;Akimichi Chonan","doi":"10.1016/j.vjgien.2013.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Histological diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMT) is a prerequisite for selecting the proper therapeutic approach. EUS-FNA has improved the evaluation of SMT. Endoscopic biopsy by mucosal incision (EBM) is a diagnostic procedure developed by Yokohata et al. The principal aim of this study was to examine the potential of EBM, as an alternative to the more expensive and technically-demanding EUS-FNA, in diagnosing SMT. This retrospective study included a consecutive series of 27 patients (15 males and 12 females, mean age 60.1 years) undergoing EBM and 11 patients (7 males and 4 females, mean age 65.7 years) undergoing EUS-FNA. The tumors had diameters of 15 mm or more, and were suspicious for continuity with the fourth layer as determined by EUS. We compared the diagnostic accuracy and the operating time of EBM with those of EUS-FNA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The diagnostic accuracies of EBM and EUS-FNA were 85.2% (23/27) and 90.0% (9/10) respectively. The average operating time of EBM and EUS-FNA was 20 min and 41.0 min respectively. During our investigation no major complications were encountered in either group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EBM matches EUS-FNA in diagnostic accuracy of SMT and is more time and cost-efficient.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101274,"journal":{"name":"Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy","volume":"1 3","pages":"Pages 644-646"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.vjgien.2013.08.002","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212097113000538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Histological diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMT) is a prerequisite for selecting the proper therapeutic approach. EUS-FNA has improved the evaluation of SMT. Endoscopic biopsy by mucosal incision (EBM) is a diagnostic procedure developed by Yokohata et al. The principal aim of this study was to examine the potential of EBM, as an alternative to the more expensive and technically-demanding EUS-FNA, in diagnosing SMT. This retrospective study included a consecutive series of 27 patients (15 males and 12 females, mean age 60.1 years) undergoing EBM and 11 patients (7 males and 4 females, mean age 65.7 years) undergoing EUS-FNA. The tumors had diameters of 15 mm or more, and were suspicious for continuity with the fourth layer as determined by EUS. We compared the diagnostic accuracy and the operating time of EBM with those of EUS-FNA.

Results

The diagnostic accuracies of EBM and EUS-FNA were 85.2% (23/27) and 90.0% (9/10) respectively. The average operating time of EBM and EUS-FNA was 20 min and 41.0 min respectively. During our investigation no major complications were encountered in either group.

Conclusion

EBM matches EUS-FNA in diagnostic accuracy of SMT and is more time and cost-efficient.

上消化道粘膜下肿瘤的粘膜切口内镜活检
上消化道粘膜下肿瘤的组织学诊断是选择合适治疗方法的前提。EUS-FNA改进了SMT的评价。内镜下粘膜切口活检(EBM)是由Yokohata等人开发的一种诊断方法。本研究的主要目的是研究EBM在诊断SMT方面的潜力,作为更昂贵和技术要求更高的EUS-FNA的替代方法。本回顾性研究包括27例接受EBM的患者(15男12女,平均年龄60.1岁)和11例接受EUS-FNA的患者(7男4女,平均年龄65.7岁)。肿瘤直径大于等于15mm,经EUS检查怀疑与第四层有连续性。比较EBM与EUS-FNA的诊断准确率和手术时间。结果EBM和EUS-FNA的诊断准确率分别为85.2%(23/27)和90.0%(9/10)。EBM和EUS-FNA的平均操作时间分别为20 min和41.0 min。在我们的调查中,两组患者均未出现重大并发症。结论ebm诊断SMT的准确性与EUS-FNA相当,且更具时代性和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信