Plating versus wiring for fixation of traumatic rib and sternal fractures

Mostafa Kamel Abd-Elnaim, Ahmed El-Minshawy, Mohamed Abd-Elkader Osman, Mohamed Mahmoud Ahmed
{"title":"Plating versus wiring for fixation of traumatic rib and sternal fractures","authors":"Mostafa Kamel Abd-Elnaim,&nbsp;Ahmed El-Minshawy,&nbsp;Mohamed Abd-Elkader Osman,&nbsp;Mohamed Mahmoud Ahmed","doi":"10.1016/j.jescts.2017.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The fracture of ribs is a common injury presenting to trauma centers and hospitals. Along the years, a lot of methods have been introduced to stabilize the rib and sternal fractures, as most of studies reported that the treatment of these cases is warranted. In spite of the large number of methods for fixation introduced; no definitive method has been presented yet.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From July 2015 to November 2016, the data of 30 patients with rib or sternal fractures or both who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were collected prospectively. Those patients were assigned into two groups; (group A) the fractures were fixed by plates and (group B) were fixed by stainless steel wires. The choice of method of fixation depended on surgeon's experience. The variables evaluated included stability of chest wall, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay and ventilator days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The chest wall stability in (group A) was achieved in 100% of the patients, while in (group B) it was achieved in 60% of patients. Intensive care unit stay for group A was 9 ± 4.37 days and for group B 13.8 ± 7.61 (p = 0.031). Hospital stay for group A was 11.6 ± 5.27 days and for group B 17.1 ± 6.77 (p = 0.021). Ventilator days for (group A) were 6.38 ± 3.83 days, while in (group B) 10.3 ± 8.82days, however this difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.129).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Plating of rib and sternal fractures had better outcome than wiring, regarding better chest wall stability and restoration of chest contour; also it had shorter intensive care unit, hospital and ventilator days.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":"25 4","pages":"Pages 356-361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jescts.2017.08.005","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110578X17301566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

The fracture of ribs is a common injury presenting to trauma centers and hospitals. Along the years, a lot of methods have been introduced to stabilize the rib and sternal fractures, as most of studies reported that the treatment of these cases is warranted. In spite of the large number of methods for fixation introduced; no definitive method has been presented yet.

Methods

From July 2015 to November 2016, the data of 30 patients with rib or sternal fractures or both who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were collected prospectively. Those patients were assigned into two groups; (group A) the fractures were fixed by plates and (group B) were fixed by stainless steel wires. The choice of method of fixation depended on surgeon's experience. The variables evaluated included stability of chest wall, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay and ventilator days.

Results

The chest wall stability in (group A) was achieved in 100% of the patients, while in (group B) it was achieved in 60% of patients. Intensive care unit stay for group A was 9 ± 4.37 days and for group B 13.8 ± 7.61 (p = 0.031). Hospital stay for group A was 11.6 ± 5.27 days and for group B 17.1 ± 6.77 (p = 0.021). Ventilator days for (group A) were 6.38 ± 3.83 days, while in (group B) 10.3 ± 8.82days, however this difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.129).

Conclusions

Plating of rib and sternal fractures had better outcome than wiring, regarding better chest wall stability and restoration of chest contour; also it had shorter intensive care unit, hospital and ventilator days.

外伤性肋骨和胸骨骨折的钢板与钢丝固定
背景:肋骨骨折是创伤中心和医院常见的损伤。多年来,许多方法被引入来稳定肋骨和胸骨骨折,因为大多数研究报道这些病例的治疗是必要的。尽管引入了大量的固定方法;目前还没有明确的方法。方法前瞻性收集2015年7月至2016年11月30例符合纳入标准的肋骨或胸骨骨折或两者均骨折患者的资料。这些患者被分为两组;A组采用钢板固定,B组采用不锈钢丝固定。固定方法的选择取决于外科医生的经验。评估的变量包括胸壁稳定性、重症监护病房时间、住院时间和呼吸机天数。结果A组胸壁稳定率100%,B组胸壁稳定率60%。A组重症监护时间为(9±4.37)天,B组为(13.8±7.61)天(p = 0.031)。A组住院时间为11.6±5.27天,B组为17.1±6.77天(p = 0.021)。A组(6.38±3.83)d, B组(10.3±8.82)d,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.129)。结论在胸壁稳定性和胸部轮廓恢复方面,肋骨和胸骨骨折吻合术的效果优于内固定术;重症监护病房、住院和呼吸机的天数也更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信