Efficacy and Safety of Buprenorphine in a Single-Shot Peripheral Nerve Block: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Q3 Medicine
AANA journal Pub Date : 2023-04-01
April Cook, Tito D Tubog, William Johnson, Hallie Evans
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Buprenorphine in a Single-Shot Peripheral Nerve Block: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"April Cook,&nbsp;Tito D Tubog,&nbsp;William Johnson,&nbsp;Hallie Evans","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of buprenorphine compared with placebo in prolonging the duration of analgesia in single-injection peripheral nerve block. The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the PRISMA statement and Review Manager was used for meta-analysis. Outcomes were calculated using the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous data. For dichotomous outcomes, effect sizes were estimated by calculating pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. Statistical heterogeneity was estimated by the I<sup>2</sup> statistic. Compared with placebo, buprenorphine prolonged the duration of analgesia by an average of 8 hours (MD, 8.01; 95% CI, 6.79 to 9.24; P < .00001). The cumulative pain scores within 24 hours (MD, -0.8; 95% CI, -1.21 to -0.40; P < .0001) and the 24-hour opioid consumption (MD, -5.56; 95% CI, -10.60 to -0.52; P = .03) after surgery was lower with buprenorphine group. Conversely, buprenorphine increased the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (RR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.39; P = .006). Buprenorphine is effective in prolonging analgesia, decreasing pain scores and opioid consumption, however, it increases the risk of PONV.</p>","PeriodicalId":7104,"journal":{"name":"AANA journal","volume":"91 2","pages":"93-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AANA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of buprenorphine compared with placebo in prolonging the duration of analgesia in single-injection peripheral nerve block. The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the PRISMA statement and Review Manager was used for meta-analysis. Outcomes were calculated using the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous data. For dichotomous outcomes, effect sizes were estimated by calculating pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. Statistical heterogeneity was estimated by the I2 statistic. Compared with placebo, buprenorphine prolonged the duration of analgesia by an average of 8 hours (MD, 8.01; 95% CI, 6.79 to 9.24; P < .00001). The cumulative pain scores within 24 hours (MD, -0.8; 95% CI, -1.21 to -0.40; P < .0001) and the 24-hour opioid consumption (MD, -5.56; 95% CI, -10.60 to -0.52; P = .03) after surgery was lower with buprenorphine group. Conversely, buprenorphine increased the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (RR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.39; P = .006). Buprenorphine is effective in prolonging analgesia, decreasing pain scores and opioid consumption, however, it increases the risk of PONV.

丁丙诺啡在单次周围神经阻滞中的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
本研究的目的是评价丁丙诺啡与安慰剂在延长单次注射外周神经阻滞镇痛时间方面的安全性和有效性。按照PRISMA声明进行系统评价和meta分析,meta分析采用review Manager软件。结果采用连续数据95%置信区间(CI)的均值差(MD)计算。对于二分类结果,通过计算95% CI的合并风险比(RR)来估计效应量。采用I2统计量估计统计异质性。与安慰剂相比,丁丙诺啡使镇痛持续时间平均延长8小时(MD, 8.01;95% CI, 6.79 ~ 9.24;P < 0.001)。24小时内累积疼痛评分(MD, -0.8;95% CI, -1.21 ~ -0.40;P < 0.0001)和24小时阿片类药物消耗(MD, -5.56;95% CI, -10.60 ~ -0.52;P = .03),丁丙诺啡组术后血清血清素含量较对照组低。相反,丁丙诺啡增加了术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率(RR, 1.67;95% CI, 1.16 ~ 2.39;P = .006)。丁丙诺啡在延长镇痛、降低疼痛评分和阿片类药物消耗方面有效,但增加了PONV的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AANA journal
AANA journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Founded in 1931 and located in Park Ridge, Ill., the AANA is the professional organization for more than 90 percent of the nation’s nurse anesthetists. As advanced practice nurses, CRNAs administer approximately 32 million anesthetics in the United States each year. CRNAs practice in every setting where anesthesia is available and are the sole anesthesia providers in more than two-thirds of all rural hospitals. They administer every type of anesthetic, and provide care for every type of surgery or procedure, from open heart to cataract to pain management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信