Elisabeth Prause , Jeremias Hey , Florian Beuer , Martin Rosentritt
{"title":"Factors influencing retention of resin-based luting systems on implants: A systematic review","authors":"Elisabeth Prause , Jeremias Hey , Florian Beuer , Martin Rosentritt","doi":"10.1016/j.dentre.2022.100056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The large variety in materials makes it difficult for dentists to select the right material for appropriate retention of single crowns on implants. An assessment of the retentive force and influencing parameters is lacking. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the retention values of resin-based luting materials of single tooth crowns on implants. Influencing factors, such as the abutment geometry, different pretreatment options, or the application of resin-based systems, are taken into account.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A Pubmed-Medline library search was conducted, supported by manual searching, to collect available studies between the years 2005 to 2020. The following MeSH terms were used: “dental AND implant AND crown AND cementation AND retention”, as well as other combinations to identify as many studies as possible.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After setting the filters and deleting the duplicates, 269 studies were identified. Finally, 23 studies were considered eligible for this review. Resin-based adhesive luting materials in combination with a primer showed the highest retention values. The retention is significantly influenced by a small cement gap, high loading during cementation, and pretreatment of the abutment. A low bias risk was shown for all included studies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The large number of available resin-based luting materials offer dentists the possibility to influence the individual retention of single-tooth crowns on implants. According to the present study, retentive strength can be clinically influenced not only by the choice of luting material. A pretreatment using sandblasting and an appropriate primer influences retention positively. Exerting pressure on the restoration after cementation also leads to increased retention. However, clinical studies would be desirable for the future to further investigate the results of this review.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100364,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Review","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100056"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559622000219/pdfft?md5=f7266ad17ddb21c5e71e3a1e69da2fa1&pid=1-s2.0-S2772559622000219-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559622000219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The large variety in materials makes it difficult for dentists to select the right material for appropriate retention of single crowns on implants. An assessment of the retentive force and influencing parameters is lacking. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the retention values of resin-based luting materials of single tooth crowns on implants. Influencing factors, such as the abutment geometry, different pretreatment options, or the application of resin-based systems, are taken into account.
Methods
A Pubmed-Medline library search was conducted, supported by manual searching, to collect available studies between the years 2005 to 2020. The following MeSH terms were used: “dental AND implant AND crown AND cementation AND retention”, as well as other combinations to identify as many studies as possible.
Results
After setting the filters and deleting the duplicates, 269 studies were identified. Finally, 23 studies were considered eligible for this review. Resin-based adhesive luting materials in combination with a primer showed the highest retention values. The retention is significantly influenced by a small cement gap, high loading during cementation, and pretreatment of the abutment. A low bias risk was shown for all included studies.
Conclusions
The large number of available resin-based luting materials offer dentists the possibility to influence the individual retention of single-tooth crowns on implants. According to the present study, retentive strength can be clinically influenced not only by the choice of luting material. A pretreatment using sandblasting and an appropriate primer influences retention positively. Exerting pressure on the restoration after cementation also leads to increased retention. However, clinical studies would be desirable for the future to further investigate the results of this review.
目的:由于材料种类繁多,牙医很难选择合适的材料来进行种植体单冠固位。缺乏对固位力和影响参数的评估。本系统综述的目的是概述树脂基固定材料在种植体单牙冠上的固位价值。影响因素,如基台几何形状,不同的预处理选择,或树脂基系统的应用,都要考虑在内。方法采用Pubmed-Medline图书馆检索方法,以人工检索为辅助,收集2005 ~ 2020年的文献。使用以下MeSH术语:“dental AND implant AND crown AND cementation AND retention”,以及其他组合来识别尽可能多的研究。结果设置筛选器并删除重复项后,共鉴定出269项研究。最后,23项研究被认为符合本综述的条件。树脂基胶粘剂与底漆结合使用时,保留值最高。胶结间隙小、胶结时载荷大、基台预处理对固位有显著影响。所有纳入的研究显示偏倚风险较低。结论大量可用的树脂基支架材料为牙医提供了影响种植体单牙冠固位的可能性。根据目前的研究,临床中影响固位强度的不仅仅是固位材料的选择。喷砂预处理和适当的底漆对保持性有积极影响。在固接后对修复体施加压力也会导致固位增加。然而,未来需要临床研究来进一步研究本综述的结果。