Venous stenting after deep venous thrombosis and antithrombotic therapy: A systematic review

Pieter Eijgenraam , Hugo ten Cate , Arina J. ten Cate-Hoek
{"title":"Venous stenting after deep venous thrombosis and antithrombotic therapy: A systematic review","authors":"Pieter Eijgenraam ,&nbsp;Hugo ten Cate ,&nbsp;Arina J. ten Cate-Hoek","doi":"10.1016/j.rvm.2014.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Over the last years venous stent placement<span><span><span> after deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in the iliofemoral veins has gained more attention. The majority of studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of this intervention are of poor methodological quality and the association with </span>antithrombotic therapy has not been studied explicitly. We performed a </span>systematic review to summarize the available literature on antithrombotic management in relation to the safety and efficacy of venous stenting.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>We performed a Medline search to identify studies that addressed anticoagulation<span> and/or antiplatelet </span></span>treatment options after venous stenting </span>in patients with a prior DVT in the iliofemoral area. We identified 192 articles and finally selected 14 articles for use in this review.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 86% (12/14) of the included studies anticoagulation was administered to all patients who underwent iliac venous stenting. In 33% of the studies patients received antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin<span><span> and/or clopidogrel (4/12). The duration of antithrombotic treatment was not guided by the stenting procedure in 93% (13/14) of studies. The incidence of re-thrombosis in (sub) groups of only stented patients, ranged from 5% to 25%. Primary, assisted primary, and secondary </span>patency rates 12 months after stent placement ranged from 54%, 72%, 83% respectively to 78%, 83%, 95% in (sub)groups of only stented patients. Rates of major bleedings during long term follow-up ranged from 0% to11%.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Antithrombotic therapy does not seem to influence any of the outcomes in patients with venous stenting after DVT: recurrent DVT, patency, post-thrombotic syndrome or restenosis and bleeding.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101091,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Vascular Medicine","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 88-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rvm.2014.03.001","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212021114000150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Introduction

Over the last years venous stent placement after deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in the iliofemoral veins has gained more attention. The majority of studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of this intervention are of poor methodological quality and the association with antithrombotic therapy has not been studied explicitly. We performed a systematic review to summarize the available literature on antithrombotic management in relation to the safety and efficacy of venous stenting.

Methods

We performed a Medline search to identify studies that addressed anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet treatment options after venous stenting in patients with a prior DVT in the iliofemoral area. We identified 192 articles and finally selected 14 articles for use in this review.

Results

In 86% (12/14) of the included studies anticoagulation was administered to all patients who underwent iliac venous stenting. In 33% of the studies patients received antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin and/or clopidogrel (4/12). The duration of antithrombotic treatment was not guided by the stenting procedure in 93% (13/14) of studies. The incidence of re-thrombosis in (sub) groups of only stented patients, ranged from 5% to 25%. Primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates 12 months after stent placement ranged from 54%, 72%, 83% respectively to 78%, 83%, 95% in (sub)groups of only stented patients. Rates of major bleedings during long term follow-up ranged from 0% to11%.

Conclusion

Antithrombotic therapy does not seem to influence any of the outcomes in patients with venous stenting after DVT: recurrent DVT, patency, post-thrombotic syndrome or restenosis and bleeding.

深静脉血栓形成和抗血栓治疗后静脉支架植入术:系统回顾
在过去的几年里,髂股静脉深静脉血栓形成(DVT)后静脉支架置入术得到了越来越多的关注。大多数评估这种干预的安全性和有效性的研究方法质量很差,并且与抗血栓治疗的关联尚未得到明确研究。我们进行了一项系统的综述,总结了与静脉支架术的安全性和有效性有关的抗血栓管理的现有文献。方法:我们进行Medline检索,以确定针对髂股区深静脉血栓患者静脉支架术后抗凝和/或抗血小板治疗选择的研究。我们筛选了192篇文章,最终选择了14篇文章纳入本综述。结果86%(12/14)的患者接受了髂静脉支架植入术。在33%的研究中,患者接受由阿司匹林和/或氯吡格雷组成的抗血小板治疗(4/12)。在93%(13/14)的研究中,抗血栓治疗的持续时间不受支架手术的指导。仅支架患者的(亚)组再血栓发生率从5%到25%不等。支架置入术后12个月的原发性、辅助原发性和继发性通畅率分别为54%、72%、83%到仅支架患者(亚)组的78%、83%、95%。长期随访期间大出血发生率从0%到11%不等。结论抗栓治疗似乎不影响深静脉血栓搭桥术后静脉支架患者的任何预后:深静脉血栓复发、通畅、血栓后综合征或再狭窄和出血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信