Adaptations to the farm crisis: Macro level implications of micro level behaviors

Applied behavioral science review Pub Date : 1993-01-01 Epub Date: 2004-04-22 DOI:10.1016/1068-8595(93)90022-2
Michael D. Schulman, Shelia R. Cotten
{"title":"Adaptations to the farm crisis: Macro level implications of micro level behaviors","authors":"Michael D. Schulman,&nbsp;Shelia R. Cotten","doi":"10.1016/1068-8595(93)90022-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using panel data collected during a short term crisis period, the changes in household labor and finances of a random sample of North Carolina farm operations are examined. Most farms (63 percent) reported no changes in their labor allocation patterns or financial arrangements. Among farms that reported some type of change, postponing farm or household purchases, restructuring financial liabilities, and increasing family income were the most widely utilized adaptations. Variables measuring farm and household economic hardship discriminate the group that used any type of adaptation from the group that attempted no changes. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the effect of adaptation use on survival in agriculture. Farm operations that attempted any type of change in their use of labor and capital were the ones that ultimately did not survive in agriculture. The results point to the need to consider the linkage between macro level structural conditions and the micro level behavior of individuals and households in developing policy interventions to ameliorate economic hardship.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84178,"journal":{"name":"Applied behavioral science review","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 93-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/1068-8595(93)90022-2","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied behavioral science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/1068859593900222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2004/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Using panel data collected during a short term crisis period, the changes in household labor and finances of a random sample of North Carolina farm operations are examined. Most farms (63 percent) reported no changes in their labor allocation patterns or financial arrangements. Among farms that reported some type of change, postponing farm or household purchases, restructuring financial liabilities, and increasing family income were the most widely utilized adaptations. Variables measuring farm and household economic hardship discriminate the group that used any type of adaptation from the group that attempted no changes. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the effect of adaptation use on survival in agriculture. Farm operations that attempted any type of change in their use of labor and capital were the ones that ultimately did not survive in agriculture. The results point to the need to consider the linkage between macro level structural conditions and the micro level behavior of individuals and households in developing policy interventions to ameliorate economic hardship.

对农业危机的适应:微观行为的宏观影响
利用短期危机期间收集的面板数据,对北卡罗来纳州农场经营的随机样本的家庭劳动力和财务状况的变化进行了检查。大多数农场(63%)报告称其劳动力分配模式或财务安排没有变化。在报告发生某种变化的农场中,推迟农场或家庭采购、重组金融负债和增加家庭收入是最广泛采用的适应措施。衡量农场和家庭经济困难的变量区分了使用任何类型适应的群体和不尝试改变的群体。采用多项逻辑回归分析了适应利用对农业生存的影响。任何试图改变劳动力和资本使用方式的农场经营最终都无法在农业中生存下来。结果表明,在制定改善经济困难的政策干预措施时,需要考虑宏观层面结构条件与个人和家庭微观层面行为之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书