Transcutaneous PCO2 monitoring: Does it really help when initiating noninvasive ventilation in acute-on-chronic respiratory failure?

{"title":"Transcutaneous PCO2 monitoring: Does it really help when initiating noninvasive ventilation in acute-on-chronic respiratory failure?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To assess the efficacy of transcutaneous Pco2 (Ptcco2) measurements for monitoring alveolar ventilation in patients requiring noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a prospective study on method agreement pairs of Paco2 and Ptcco2 (SenTec Digital Monitor; SenTec AG; Therwil, Switzerland), measurements were performed every 10<!--> <!-->min during the establishment of NPPV over a 4-h period in 10 patients (8 patients with COPD) presenting with acute-on-chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, thus providing 250 pairs of measurement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean (+/−SD) Paco2 decreased from 67.2+/−11.9<!--> <!-->mm Hg (Ptcco2, 65.5+/−13.9<!--> <!-->mm Hg) to 54.6+/−8.8<!--> <!-->mm Hg (Ptcco2, 47.8+/−8.8<!--> <!-->mm Hg), and mean pH increased from 7.36+/−0.03 to 7.44+/−0.04. Following Ptcco2 assessment, Ptcco2 in the ensuing 2-min period was the strongest predictor for Paco2 compared to Ptcco2 in the ensuing 5-min period and to real-time measurements. Ptcco2 was highly correlated with Paco2 (r=0.916; p&lt;0.001), as determined by linear regression analysis. The mean difference between Paco2 and Ptcco2 was 4.6<!--> <!-->mm Hg, and the limits of agreement (bias +/− 1.96 SDs) ranged from −3.9 to 13.2<!--> <!-->mm Hg, following the Bland and Altman analysis. Retrospective drift correction produced an even higher correlation (r=0.956; p&lt;0.001) with lower limits of agreement (−1.7 to 7.5<!--> <!-->mm Hg).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Ptcco2 measurements provide a sensitive, continuous, and noninvasive method for monitoring alveolar ventilation in patients who are receiving short-term NPPV therapy. Drift correction of Ptcco2 measurements improves the accuracy of Ptcco2 monitoring compared to the “gold standard” Paco2 assessment. A lag time of approximately 2<!--> <!-->min is present for reliable Ptcco2 values compared to Paco2 values. However, individual variance between Paco2 and Ptcco2 cannot be excluded. Trial registration: <span>www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/zks/live/uklregister/Oeffentlich.html Identifier:UKF001271</span><svg><path></path></svg>.<br></p><p>©2007 American College of Chest Physicians</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101083,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.02.008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1745045408000166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To assess the efficacy of transcutaneous Pco2 (Ptcco2) measurements for monitoring alveolar ventilation in patients requiring noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV).

Methods

In a prospective study on method agreement pairs of Paco2 and Ptcco2 (SenTec Digital Monitor; SenTec AG; Therwil, Switzerland), measurements were performed every 10 min during the establishment of NPPV over a 4-h period in 10 patients (8 patients with COPD) presenting with acute-on-chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, thus providing 250 pairs of measurement.

Results

Mean (+/−SD) Paco2 decreased from 67.2+/−11.9 mm Hg (Ptcco2, 65.5+/−13.9 mm Hg) to 54.6+/−8.8 mm Hg (Ptcco2, 47.8+/−8.8 mm Hg), and mean pH increased from 7.36+/−0.03 to 7.44+/−0.04. Following Ptcco2 assessment, Ptcco2 in the ensuing 2-min period was the strongest predictor for Paco2 compared to Ptcco2 in the ensuing 5-min period and to real-time measurements. Ptcco2 was highly correlated with Paco2 (r=0.916; p<0.001), as determined by linear regression analysis. The mean difference between Paco2 and Ptcco2 was 4.6 mm Hg, and the limits of agreement (bias +/− 1.96 SDs) ranged from −3.9 to 13.2 mm Hg, following the Bland and Altman analysis. Retrospective drift correction produced an even higher correlation (r=0.956; p<0.001) with lower limits of agreement (−1.7 to 7.5 mm Hg).

Conclusions

Ptcco2 measurements provide a sensitive, continuous, and noninvasive method for monitoring alveolar ventilation in patients who are receiving short-term NPPV therapy. Drift correction of Ptcco2 measurements improves the accuracy of Ptcco2 monitoring compared to the “gold standard” Paco2 assessment. A lag time of approximately 2 min is present for reliable Ptcco2 values compared to Paco2 values. However, individual variance between Paco2 and Ptcco2 cannot be excluded. Trial registration: www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/zks/live/uklregister/Oeffentlich.html Identifier:UKF001271.

©2007 American College of Chest Physicians

经皮PCO2监测:在急性慢性呼吸衰竭患者启动无创通气时真的有帮助吗?
研究背景:评估经皮Pco2 (Ptcco2)测量在需要无创正压通气(NPPV)的患者中监测肺泡通气的有效性。方法前瞻性研究Paco2和Ptcco2 (SenTec Digital Monitor;SenTec AG);Therwil,瑞士),在NPPV建立期间每10分钟进行一次测量,持续4小时,10名患者(8名COPD患者)出现急性慢性高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭,从而提供250对测量。结果Paco2平均值(+/ - SD)从67.2+/ - 11.9 mm Hg (Ptcco2, 65.5+/ - 13.9 mm Hg)下降到54.6+/ - 8.8 mm Hg (Ptcco2, 47.8+/ - 8.8 mm Hg), pH平均值从7.36+/ - 0.03上升到7.44+/ - 0.04。在Ptcco2评估后,与随后5分钟的Ptcco2和实时测量相比,随后2分钟的Ptcco2是Paco2的最强预测因子。Ptcco2与Paco2高度相关(r=0.916;P<0.001),由线性回归分析确定。根据Bland和Altman分析,Paco2和Ptcco2的平均差异为4.6 mm Hg,一致性限(偏倚+/ - 1.96 SDs)范围为- 3.9至13.2 mm Hg。回顾性漂移校正产生了更高的相关性(r=0.956;p<0.001),下限一致(- 1.7至7.5 mm Hg)。结论sptcco2测量为接受短期NPPV治疗的患者监测肺泡通气提供了一种灵敏、连续、无创的方法。与“金标准”Paco2评估相比,Ptcco2测量的漂移校正提高了Ptcco2监测的准确性。与Paco2值相比,可靠的Ptcco2值存在大约2分钟的滞后时间。然而,不能排除Paco2和Ptcco2之间的个体差异。试验注册:www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/zks/live/uklregister/Oeffentlich.html标识符:UKF001271。©2007美国胸科医师学会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信