Combined pain self-management and antidepressant therapy are effective in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain with depression

Julia Hush
{"title":"Combined pain self-management and antidepressant therapy are effective in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain with depression","authors":"Julia Hush","doi":"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70084-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Does a combination of pain self-management and antidepressant therapy improve pain and depression in people with musculoskeletal pain and depression?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomised, controlled trial with concealed allocation and blinded outcome assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Six primary care clinics and five tertiary outpatient clinics in the USA.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Primary care patients were eligible if they had at least moderate pain in the low back, hip, or knee, present for at least 3 months despite analgesic medication, and depression of at least moderate severity. People taking antidepressants but who still met the inclusion criteria were eligible. Severe cognitive impairment, major psychoses, and current pain-related disability claims were exclusion criteria. Randomisation of 250 participants allotted 123 to an intervention group and 127 to a control group.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>The intervention group participated in the Stepped Care for Affective Disorders and Musculoskeletal Pain (SCAMP) program. During the initial 3 months (Step 1), this group optimised their antidepressant medication according to an algorithm based on clinical response, with a potential increased dose at 3 weeks and change of medication at 6 weeks for those who had not improved. During the following 3 months (Step 2), fortnightly pain self-management sessions were conducted by a nurse care manager, modelled on the Stanford self-management program. Participants were taught to modify their behaviour through behavioural plans and problem-solving techniques. During the final 6 months (Step 3), two telephone calls from the nurse care manager were used to assess symptoms and adherence, and to adjust management if required. The control group were informed that they had depressive symptoms and that they should seek advice about treatment, but received no other intervention unless a psychiatric emergency arose.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was a combined improvement in both depression and pain. Depression was assessed using the 20-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist and pain severity using the Brief Pain Inventory. Global improvement in pain was also assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>205 (82%) participants completed the final assessment. At 12 months, 26% of the intervention group achieved the primary outcome, compared with 8% of the control group (RR 3.3, 95% CI 1.8 to 5.4). For depression specifically, 37% of the intervention group had a 50% or greater reduction in depression severity from baseline compared with 16% of the control group (RR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.2). When expressed in terms of major depression, 41% of the intervention group had major depression at 12 months compared to 68% of the control group (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.8). A reduction in pain of at least 30% was more likely in the intervention group (41%) than the control group (17%) (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.6 to 3.2). Global improvement in pain also significantly improved.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Combined pain self-management and antidepressant medication result in substantial improvement in depression as well as moderate reductions in pain severity and disability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50086,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"55 3","pages":"Page 208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70084-4","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951409700844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Question

Does a combination of pain self-management and antidepressant therapy improve pain and depression in people with musculoskeletal pain and depression?

Design

Randomised, controlled trial with concealed allocation and blinded outcome assessment.

Setting

Six primary care clinics and five tertiary outpatient clinics in the USA.

Participants

Primary care patients were eligible if they had at least moderate pain in the low back, hip, or knee, present for at least 3 months despite analgesic medication, and depression of at least moderate severity. People taking antidepressants but who still met the inclusion criteria were eligible. Severe cognitive impairment, major psychoses, and current pain-related disability claims were exclusion criteria. Randomisation of 250 participants allotted 123 to an intervention group and 127 to a control group.

Interventions

The intervention group participated in the Stepped Care for Affective Disorders and Musculoskeletal Pain (SCAMP) program. During the initial 3 months (Step 1), this group optimised their antidepressant medication according to an algorithm based on clinical response, with a potential increased dose at 3 weeks and change of medication at 6 weeks for those who had not improved. During the following 3 months (Step 2), fortnightly pain self-management sessions were conducted by a nurse care manager, modelled on the Stanford self-management program. Participants were taught to modify their behaviour through behavioural plans and problem-solving techniques. During the final 6 months (Step 3), two telephone calls from the nurse care manager were used to assess symptoms and adherence, and to adjust management if required. The control group were informed that they had depressive symptoms and that they should seek advice about treatment, but received no other intervention unless a psychiatric emergency arose.

Outcome measures

The primary outcome was a combined improvement in both depression and pain. Depression was assessed using the 20-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist and pain severity using the Brief Pain Inventory. Global improvement in pain was also assessed.

Results

205 (82%) participants completed the final assessment. At 12 months, 26% of the intervention group achieved the primary outcome, compared with 8% of the control group (RR 3.3, 95% CI 1.8 to 5.4). For depression specifically, 37% of the intervention group had a 50% or greater reduction in depression severity from baseline compared with 16% of the control group (RR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.2). When expressed in terms of major depression, 41% of the intervention group had major depression at 12 months compared to 68% of the control group (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.8). A reduction in pain of at least 30% was more likely in the intervention group (41%) than the control group (17%) (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.6 to 3.2). Global improvement in pain also significantly improved.

Conclusion

Combined pain self-management and antidepressant medication result in substantial improvement in depression as well as moderate reductions in pain severity and disability.

联合疼痛自我管理和抗抑郁治疗是有效的慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的抑郁症
疼痛自我管理和抗抑郁治疗的结合是否能改善肌肉骨骼疼痛和抑郁患者的疼痛和抑郁?随机对照试验,隐匿分配和盲法结局评估。美国有6家初级保健诊所和5家三级门诊诊所。参与者:初级保健患者如果腰背、髋关节或膝关节至少有中度疼痛,尽管使用镇痛药物,但疼痛持续至少3个月,并且抑郁程度至少为中度,则符合入选条件。服用抗抑郁药但仍符合纳入标准的人符合条件。排除标准为严重认知障碍、严重精神病和当前与疼痛相关的残疾。250名参与者随机分配123人到干预组,127人到对照组。干预组参与情感性障碍和肌肉骨骼疼痛的阶梯护理(SCAMP)项目。在最初的3个月(第1步),该组根据基于临床反应的算法优化抗抑郁药物,对于那些没有改善的患者,可能在第3周增加剂量,在第6周改变药物。在接下来的3个月里(第二步),每两周由护理经理进行疼痛自我管理会议,模仿斯坦福自我管理计划。参与者被教导通过行为计划和解决问题的技巧来改变自己的行为。在最后6个月(第3步),护理经理的两次电话用于评估症状和依从性,并在需要时调整管理。对照组被告知他们有抑郁症状,他们应该寻求治疗建议,但除非出现精神紧急情况,否则不接受其他干预。主要结果是抑郁和疼痛的综合改善。使用20项霍普金斯症状检查表评估抑郁,使用简短疼痛量表评估疼痛严重程度。对疼痛的整体改善也进行了评估。结果205例(82%)参与者完成了最终评估。12个月时,干预组26%的患者达到了主要结局,对照组为8% (RR 3.3, 95% CI 1.8 - 5.4)。就抑郁症而言,干预组中37%的患者抑郁严重程度较基线降低50%或以上,而对照组为16% (RR为2.3,95% CI为1.5至3.2)。在重度抑郁症方面,干预组在12个月时有41%的患者有重度抑郁症,而对照组有68%的患者有重度抑郁症(RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 ~ 0.8)。干预组(41%)比对照组(17%)疼痛减轻至少30%的可能性更大(RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.6 - 3.2)。整体疼痛改善也显著改善。结论疼痛自我管理结合抗抑郁药物治疗可显著改善抑郁症状,减轻疼痛严重程度和残疾程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信