Auroral particle acceleration processes: the legacy of Hannes Alfvén

R. Lundin
{"title":"Auroral particle acceleration processes: the legacy of Hannes Alfvén","authors":"R. Lundin","doi":"10.1016/S1464-1917(00)00085-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Impacting corpuscular radiation was believed to be the main cause for the aurora even before the space age. However, the means by which charged particles become energized, eventually impacting into the upper atmosphere was a matter of controversy - a controversy which died out only very slowly with time. Hannes Alfvén was the lead scientists in the 1950:ies and 1960:ies who dared to challenge the ruling paradigm of space plasma physics - by 1958 suggesting field-aligned electric “discharges” as the cause of the aurora. Field-aligned electric acceleration of charged particles became a matter of debate for nearly three decades with indirect proofs for its existence steadily mounting with time, yet all the time meeting strong objections. In retrospect one may wonder why rebutting was so important. Why clinging to the concept of infinite conductivity along magnetic field lines? The reason was simple, because it challenged a ruling paradigm in space plasma physics, requiring a strong modification of “ideal MHD”.</p><p>The notion of “frozen-in-field-lines”, invented by Hannes Alfvén, is a useful concept in describing large scale morphologies. However, observations from space plasma experiments shows that the condition of frozen-in-field-lines is violated in most interesting regions where plasma acceleration occurs. Alfvén wanted to remedy what he considered the “misuse of MHD” by emphasizing currents instead of magnetic fields in space plasma physics.</p><p>In this paper I will review the energy and momentum coupling originally proposed by Alfvén and their consequences for the acceleration of charged particles. Plasma acceleration processes, well known and recognized from studies of planetary magnetospheres in our solar system, are applicable also for more remote space objects in the Universe - such as stars and galaxies. The many astrophysical implications of his theories is perhaps the most important legacy of Hannes Alfvén. In fact, new evidence for his theories are emerging from contemporary deep space data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101026,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part C: Solar, Terrestrial & Planetary Science","volume":"26 1","pages":"Pages 13-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1464-1917(00)00085-4","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part C: Solar, Terrestrial & Planetary Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464191700000854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Impacting corpuscular radiation was believed to be the main cause for the aurora even before the space age. However, the means by which charged particles become energized, eventually impacting into the upper atmosphere was a matter of controversy - a controversy which died out only very slowly with time. Hannes Alfvén was the lead scientists in the 1950:ies and 1960:ies who dared to challenge the ruling paradigm of space plasma physics - by 1958 suggesting field-aligned electric “discharges” as the cause of the aurora. Field-aligned electric acceleration of charged particles became a matter of debate for nearly three decades with indirect proofs for its existence steadily mounting with time, yet all the time meeting strong objections. In retrospect one may wonder why rebutting was so important. Why clinging to the concept of infinite conductivity along magnetic field lines? The reason was simple, because it challenged a ruling paradigm in space plasma physics, requiring a strong modification of “ideal MHD”.

The notion of “frozen-in-field-lines”, invented by Hannes Alfvén, is a useful concept in describing large scale morphologies. However, observations from space plasma experiments shows that the condition of frozen-in-field-lines is violated in most interesting regions where plasma acceleration occurs. Alfvén wanted to remedy what he considered the “misuse of MHD” by emphasizing currents instead of magnetic fields in space plasma physics.

In this paper I will review the energy and momentum coupling originally proposed by Alfvén and their consequences for the acceleration of charged particles. Plasma acceleration processes, well known and recognized from studies of planetary magnetospheres in our solar system, are applicable also for more remote space objects in the Universe - such as stars and galaxies. The many astrophysical implications of his theories is perhaps the most important legacy of Hannes Alfvén. In fact, new evidence for his theories are emerging from contemporary deep space data.

极光粒子加速过程:汉内斯·阿尔夫海姆的遗产
早在太空时代之前,撞击微粒辐射就被认为是极光的主要原因。然而,带电粒子获得能量并最终撞击上层大气的方式一直是一个有争议的问题——随着时间的推移,这个争议只是慢慢地消失了。汉内斯·阿尔夫萨芬是20世纪50年代和60年代敢于挑战空间等离子体物理学的主流范式的主要科学家——到1958年,他提出磁场排列的电“放电”是极光的原因。带电粒子的场向电加速成为一个争论了近三十年的问题,随着时间的推移,其存在的间接证据不断增加,但一直遭到强烈反对。回想起来,人们可能会奇怪为什么反驳如此重要。为什么坚持沿着磁力线无限导电性的概念?原因很简单,因为它挑战了空间等离子体物理学的主流范式,需要对“理想MHD”进行强有力的修改。由Hannes alfv发明的“冰冻场线”概念在描述大规模形态时是一个有用的概念。然而,来自空间等离子体实验的观测表明,在等离子体加速发生的最有趣的区域,冻结场线的条件是违反的。alfv因想纠正他所认为的“MHD误用”,他在空间等离子体物理学中强调电流而不是磁场。在本文中,我将回顾alfvsamin最初提出的能量和动量耦合及其对带电粒子加速的影响。等离子体加速过程,众所周知,并从我们太阳系的行星磁层的研究中得到认可,也适用于宇宙中更遥远的空间物体-如恒星和星系。他的理论的许多天体物理学含义可能是汉内斯·阿尔夫文森最重要的遗产。事实上,当代深空数据为他的理论提供了新的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信