Anatomic Utility of Single Branched Thoracic Endograft During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-24 DOI:10.1177/15385744231165988
Norman H Kumins, Ravi N Ambani, Saideep Bose, Alexander H King, Jae S Cho, Benjamin Colvard, Vikram S Kashyap
{"title":"Anatomic Utility of Single Branched Thoracic Endograft During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.","authors":"Norman H Kumins,&nbsp;Ravi N Ambani,&nbsp;Saideep Bose,&nbsp;Alexander H King,&nbsp;Jae S Cho,&nbsp;Benjamin Colvard,&nbsp;Vikram S Kashyap","doi":"10.1177/15385744231165988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Single branched thoracic endografts (SBTEs) have been designed for pathology requiring zone 2 seal during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Numerous criteria must be met to allow for their implantation. Our aim was to analyze anatomic suitability for a next generation SBTE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed 150 TEVAR procedures between 2015 and 2019. Proximal seal was: zone 0 in 21 (16%), zone 1 in 4 (3%), zone 2 in 52 (40%), zone 3 in 45 (35%), and zone 4 or distal in 7 (5%). We analyzed the Zone 2 patient's angiograms and CT angiograms using centerline software to measure arterial diameters and length in relation to the left common carotid artery (LCCA), left subclavian artery (LSA) and proximal extent of aortic disease to determine if patients met anatomic criteria of a novel SBTE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Zone 2 average age was 64.4 ± 16.3 years; 34 patients were male (65%). Indications for repair were aneurysm (N = 9, 17%), acute dissection (N = 14, 27%), chronic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration (N = 7, 13%), intramural hematoma (N = 9, 17%), penetrating aortic ulcer (N = 5, 10%), and blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI, N = 8, 15%). LSA revascularization occurred in 27 patients (52%). Overall, 20 (38.5%) of the zone 2 patients met anatomic criteria. Patients with dissection met anatomic criteria less frequently than aneurysm (33% [10 of 30] vs 64% [9 of 14]). Patients treated for BTAI rarely met the anatomic criteria (1 of 8, 13%). The main anatomic constraints were an inadequate distance from the LCCA to the LSA takeoff and from the LCCA to the start of the aortic disease process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Less than half of patients who require seal in zone 2 met criteria for this SBTE. Patients with aneurysms met anatomic criteria more often than those with dissection. The device would have little applicability in treating patients with BTAI.</p>","PeriodicalId":23530,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744231165988","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Single branched thoracic endografts (SBTEs) have been designed for pathology requiring zone 2 seal during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Numerous criteria must be met to allow for their implantation. Our aim was to analyze anatomic suitability for a next generation SBTE.

Methods: We reviewed 150 TEVAR procedures between 2015 and 2019. Proximal seal was: zone 0 in 21 (16%), zone 1 in 4 (3%), zone 2 in 52 (40%), zone 3 in 45 (35%), and zone 4 or distal in 7 (5%). We analyzed the Zone 2 patient's angiograms and CT angiograms using centerline software to measure arterial diameters and length in relation to the left common carotid artery (LCCA), left subclavian artery (LSA) and proximal extent of aortic disease to determine if patients met anatomic criteria of a novel SBTE.

Results: Zone 2 average age was 64.4 ± 16.3 years; 34 patients were male (65%). Indications for repair were aneurysm (N = 9, 17%), acute dissection (N = 14, 27%), chronic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration (N = 7, 13%), intramural hematoma (N = 9, 17%), penetrating aortic ulcer (N = 5, 10%), and blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI, N = 8, 15%). LSA revascularization occurred in 27 patients (52%). Overall, 20 (38.5%) of the zone 2 patients met anatomic criteria. Patients with dissection met anatomic criteria less frequently than aneurysm (33% [10 of 30] vs 64% [9 of 14]). Patients treated for BTAI rarely met the anatomic criteria (1 of 8, 13%). The main anatomic constraints were an inadequate distance from the LCCA to the LSA takeoff and from the LCCA to the start of the aortic disease process.

Conclusion: Less than half of patients who require seal in zone 2 met criteria for this SBTE. Patients with aneurysms met anatomic criteria more often than those with dissection. The device would have little applicability in treating patients with BTAI.

单支胸主动脉内移植物在胸主动脉内修复中的解剖学应用。
简介:单支胸主动脉内移植物(SBTE)已被设计用于在胸主动脉腔内修复(TEVAR)过程中需要2区密封的病理学。必须满足许多标准才能进行植入。我们的目的是分析下一代SBTE的解剖学适用性。方法:我们回顾了2015年至2019年间的150项TEVAR程序。近端密封为:21例中有0例(16%),4例中有1例(3%),52例中有2例(40%),45例中有3例(35%),7例中有4例或远端(5%)。我们使用中心线软件分析了2区患者的血管造影照片和CT血管造影照片,以测量与左颈总动脉(LCCA)、左锁骨下动脉(LSA)和主动脉疾病近端范围相关的动脉直径和长度,以确定患者是否符合新型SBTE的解剖标准。结果:2区平均年龄64.4±16.3岁;34例为男性(65%)。修复适应症为动脉瘤(N=9,17%)、急性夹层(N=14,27%)、伴有动脉瘤变性的慢性夹层(N=7,13%)、壁内血肿(N=9、17%)、穿透性主动脉溃疡(N=5,10%)和钝性创伤性主动脉损伤(BTAI,N=8,15%)。LSA血运重建发生在27名患者中(52%)。总体而言,2区患者中有20名(38.5%)符合解剖标准。夹层患者符合解剖标准的频率低于动脉瘤(33%[10/30]vs 64%[9/14])。接受BTAI治疗的患者很少符合解剖标准(1/8,13%)。主要的解剖限制是从LCCA到LSA起飞以及从LCCA开始到主动脉疾病过程的距离不足。结论:在2区需要密封的患者中,只有不到一半符合SBTE的标准。动脉瘤患者比夹层患者更符合解剖标准。该设备在治疗BTAI患者方面几乎没有适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery SURGERY-PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
132
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (VES) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes information to guide vascular specialists in endovascular, surgical, and medical treatment of vascular disease. VES contains original scientific articles on vascular intervention, including new endovascular therapies for peripheral artery, aneurysm, carotid, and venous conditions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信