Calidad percibida en la fisioterapia de atención primaria: situación y oportunidades de mejora en la atención a la cervicalgia

Ana Belén Meseguer Henarejos , Francesc Medina i Mirapeix , Pilar Escolar Reina , Joaquina Montilla Herrador , Nuria Hernández Cascales , M. Carmen Hidalgo García
{"title":"Calidad percibida en la fisioterapia de atención primaria: situación y oportunidades de mejora en la atención a la cervicalgia","authors":"Ana Belén Meseguer Henarejos ,&nbsp;Francesc Medina i Mirapeix ,&nbsp;Pilar Escolar Reina ,&nbsp;Joaquina Montilla Herrador ,&nbsp;Nuria Hernández Cascales ,&nbsp;M. Carmen Hidalgo García","doi":"10.1016/S1138-6045(08)76325-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe and compare how frequently patients with neck pain perceive different aspects related with the quality of physical therapy care of several health care centers.</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>A descriptive, cross-sectional and analytic study was conducted. Patients with mechanical and non-traumatic neck pain were included. Information was collected using a self-report and previously validated questionnaire. Rate of answer and non- answer bias were analyzed. An adjusted descriptive analysis was performed, using indicators and the perceived quality was compared among centers based on indicators in each center, and the value average and percentiles of all centers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 111 out of 162 questionnaires were collected. No significant differences were detected among those who responded and those who did respond to the questionnaire in relationship to gender and study level, but there were significant differences for age and previous physical therapy use. The dimensions of Waiting Time and Professional Competence are those that present the higher percentage of problems of perceived quality, 61.4% (52.4-70.4) and 51.7% (42.4-61.0), respectively. The dimension Organization has the lowest percentage of problems, 24.4 % (16.4-32.4). There are differences in the levels of quality perceived between most of the centers regarding the dimensions of Information and Professional Competence, and only between some centers regarding Time of wait and Organization.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The areas of Information and Professional Competence are those that accumulate the most problems of perceived quality. There is variability in the levels of perceived quality among the participant centers of health care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101113,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Fisioterapia y Kinesiología","volume":"11 2","pages":"Pages 68-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1138-6045(08)76325-1","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de Fisioterapia y Kinesiología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138604508763251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objectives

To describe and compare how frequently patients with neck pain perceive different aspects related with the quality of physical therapy care of several health care centers.

Material and Methods

A descriptive, cross-sectional and analytic study was conducted. Patients with mechanical and non-traumatic neck pain were included. Information was collected using a self-report and previously validated questionnaire. Rate of answer and non- answer bias were analyzed. An adjusted descriptive analysis was performed, using indicators and the perceived quality was compared among centers based on indicators in each center, and the value average and percentiles of all centers.

Results

A total of 111 out of 162 questionnaires were collected. No significant differences were detected among those who responded and those who did respond to the questionnaire in relationship to gender and study level, but there were significant differences for age and previous physical therapy use. The dimensions of Waiting Time and Professional Competence are those that present the higher percentage of problems of perceived quality, 61.4% (52.4-70.4) and 51.7% (42.4-61.0), respectively. The dimension Organization has the lowest percentage of problems, 24.4 % (16.4-32.4). There are differences in the levels of quality perceived between most of the centers regarding the dimensions of Information and Professional Competence, and only between some centers regarding Time of wait and Organization.

Conclusions

The areas of Information and Professional Competence are those that accumulate the most problems of perceived quality. There is variability in the levels of perceived quality among the participant centers of health care.

初级护理物理治疗的感知质量:颈椎疼痛护理的现状和改善机会
目的描述和比较不同卫生保健中心的颈部疼痛患者对物理治疗护理质量的不同方面的感知频率。材料与方法采用描述性、横断面和分析性研究。包括机械性和非外伤性颈部疼痛患者。使用自我报告和先前验证过的问卷收集信息。分析了回答率和非回答偏差。采用指标进行调整后的描述性分析,并根据各中心的指标、各中心的平均值和百分位数比较各中心之间的感知质量。结果共收集问卷162份,回收问卷111份。回答问卷者和回答问卷者在性别和学习水平方面无显著差异,但在年龄和既往物理治疗使用方面存在显著差异。等待时间和专业能力是出现感知质量问题比例较高的维度,分别为61.4%(52.4-70.4)和51.7%(42.4-61.0)。组织维度的问题百分比最低,为24.4%(16.4-32.4)。大多数中心在信息和专业能力两个维度上的感知质量水平存在差异,只有一些中心在等待时间和组织方面存在差异。结论信息和专业能力领域是感知质量问题积累最多的领域。医疗保健参与中心的感知质量水平存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信