{"title":"Efectividad del uso combinado de varias escalas para medir el riesgo de caídas en ancianos","authors":"Javier Aceituno Gómez","doi":"10.1016/S1138-6045(08)76324-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To attempt to establish a relationship among combined actions of several assessment scales of risk of falls related to previous reports of involuntary falls by elderly institutionalized subjects in a day care service during the last year.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Evaluations of day care center users were carried out with the Tinetti test, Timed up and Go, Functional Reach test and JH Dowton fall risk scale. In addition to age, the Barthel index of functional capacity and existence or not of falls during the last year was recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>38 people (25 women and 13 men) were studied. Mean age was 81.5 (SD: 5.4) and the Barthel index 84.1(17.2). Individual tests showed a similar proportion of falls among users at risk (approx. 55 %) and a greater difference among users without risks. In an isolated way, the greatest predictive effectiveness on falls followed the next sequence: Tinetti, JH Dowton, Timed Up and Go and Functional Reach. Nevertheless, when the four trials are combined, it can be observed that 63.6% of the elderly have had 3 or 4 positive trials have suffered at least one fall during the last year, while this percentage is reduced to 25 % among those with 2 or less positives on the risk assessment scales.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The combined use of the four assessment scales used in this study shows better sensitivity to the risk of fall than evaluation with individual use of the above-mentioned tests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101113,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Fisioterapia y Kinesiología","volume":"11 2","pages":"Pages 60-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1138-6045(08)76324-X","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de Fisioterapia y Kinesiología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S113860450876324X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Objective
To attempt to establish a relationship among combined actions of several assessment scales of risk of falls related to previous reports of involuntary falls by elderly institutionalized subjects in a day care service during the last year.
Patients and methods
Evaluations of day care center users were carried out with the Tinetti test, Timed up and Go, Functional Reach test and JH Dowton fall risk scale. In addition to age, the Barthel index of functional capacity and existence or not of falls during the last year was recorded.
Results
38 people (25 women and 13 men) were studied. Mean age was 81.5 (SD: 5.4) and the Barthel index 84.1(17.2). Individual tests showed a similar proportion of falls among users at risk (approx. 55 %) and a greater difference among users without risks. In an isolated way, the greatest predictive effectiveness on falls followed the next sequence: Tinetti, JH Dowton, Timed Up and Go and Functional Reach. Nevertheless, when the four trials are combined, it can be observed that 63.6% of the elderly have had 3 or 4 positive trials have suffered at least one fall during the last year, while this percentage is reduced to 25 % among those with 2 or less positives on the risk assessment scales.
Conclusions
The combined use of the four assessment scales used in this study shows better sensitivity to the risk of fall than evaluation with individual use of the above-mentioned tests.
目的探讨近一年来住院老人非自愿跌倒相关的跌倒风险评估量表组合行为之间的关系。采用Tinetti测试、Timed up and Go测试、Functional Reach测试和JH Dowton跌倒风险量表对日托中心使用者进行评估。除年龄外,还记录了过去一年中功能能力和有无跌倒的Barthel指数。结果共对38人(女性25人,男性13人)进行了研究。平均年龄81.5岁(SD: 5.4), Barthel指数84.1(17.2)。个人测试显示,在有风险的用户中,跌倒的比例相似(约为10%)。55%),而在没有风险的用户中差异更大。从孤立的角度来看,对跌倒的预测效果最好的顺序是:蒂内蒂、JH道顿、Timed Up and Go和功能性到达。然而,当四项试验结合起来时,可以观察到63.6%的老年人在过去一年中进行了3或4次阳性试验,至少有一次跌倒,而在风险评估量表上阳性2次或更少的老年人中,这一比例降至25%。结论综合使用四种评估量表对跌倒风险的敏感性优于单独使用上述四种评估量表。