Insulin effects on the sympathetic contraction of rabbit ear arteries

Angel Luis Garcı́a-Villalón, Nuria Fernández, Luis Monge, Marı́a Angeles Martı́nez, Bernardino Gómez, Godofredo Diéguez
{"title":"Insulin effects on the sympathetic contraction of rabbit ear arteries","authors":"Angel Luis Garcı́a-Villalón,&nbsp;Nuria Fernández,&nbsp;Luis Monge,&nbsp;Marı́a Angeles Martı́nez,&nbsp;Bernardino Gómez,&nbsp;Godofredo Diéguez","doi":"10.1016/S0306-3623(00)00063-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Electrical field stimulation (4 Hz, 0.2 ms, 70 V supramaximal voltage, 10 s duration) produced contraction of perfused rabbit central ear arteries, and this contraction was reduced by incubation with insulin (0.6–200 mU/ml). This inhibitory effect of insulin was not significantly modified by removing the endothelium, or by treatment with <em>N</em><sup>W</sup>-nitro-<span>l</span>-arginine (<span>l</span>-NA, 10<sup>−4</sup> M), meclofenamate (10<sup>−5</sup> M), ouabain (10<sup>−6</sup> M), or cocaine (10<sup>−5</sup> M). Insulin (200 mU/ml) did not modify the vascular contraction due to exogenous norepinephrine (10<sup>−8</sup>–10<sup>−4</sup> M) nor the relaxation due to acetylcholine (10<sup>−8</sup>–10<sup>−4</sup> M). This suggests that insulin may reduce vascular contraction by sympathetic stimulation, and this effect is not dependent on endothelial nitric oxide, prostanoids, or Na<sup>+</sup>–K<sup>+</sup> pump activation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12607,"journal":{"name":"General Pharmacology-the Vascular System","volume":"34 4","pages":"Pages 221-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0306-3623(00)00063-X","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Pharmacology-the Vascular System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030636230000063X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Electrical field stimulation (4 Hz, 0.2 ms, 70 V supramaximal voltage, 10 s duration) produced contraction of perfused rabbit central ear arteries, and this contraction was reduced by incubation with insulin (0.6–200 mU/ml). This inhibitory effect of insulin was not significantly modified by removing the endothelium, or by treatment with NW-nitro-l-arginine (l-NA, 10−4 M), meclofenamate (10−5 M), ouabain (10−6 M), or cocaine (10−5 M). Insulin (200 mU/ml) did not modify the vascular contraction due to exogenous norepinephrine (10−8–10−4 M) nor the relaxation due to acetylcholine (10−8–10−4 M). This suggests that insulin may reduce vascular contraction by sympathetic stimulation, and this effect is not dependent on endothelial nitric oxide, prostanoids, or Na+–K+ pump activation.

胰岛素对兔耳动脉交感神经收缩的影响
电场刺激(4 Hz, 0.2 ms, 70 V最大电压,持续时间10 s)使灌注的兔中央耳动脉收缩,胰岛素(0.6 ~ 200 mU/ml)可使这种收缩减弱。胰岛素(200 mU/ml)不会改变外源性去甲肾上腺素(10−8-10−4 M)引起的血管收缩,也不会改变乙酰胆碱(10−8-10−4 M)引起的血管松弛,这表明胰岛素可能通过交感神经刺激来减少血管收缩。这种作用不依赖于内皮一氧化氮、前列腺素或Na+ -K +泵的激活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信