Horacio Alberto Caviglia, Adriana Beatriz Pemoff, Hernán Esteban Blanchetiere, Nicolás Gabriel Cuestas, Ramiro Alvarez, Matías Sebastián Vergara
{"title":"Fractura-luxación del complejo distal del codo, ¿es la tétrada terrible una nueva entidad?","authors":"Horacio Alberto Caviglia, Adriana Beatriz Pemoff, Hernán Esteban Blanchetiere, Nicolás Gabriel Cuestas, Ramiro Alvarez, Matías Sebastián Vergara","doi":"10.1016/j.rslaot.2016.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the terrible tetrad and treatment algorithm in patients and cadaver models to differentiate it from other entities that affect the distal elbow complex and the differences in their treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methodology</h3><p>We studied 7 patients (5 women and 2 men) with a mean age of 51 years, who had had posterior or posterolateral elbow dislocation associated with fracture of coronoid process, radial head and olecranon. We reproduced the lesional association tetrad in 3 cadaveric specimens. Treatment included the reduction and stabilization of the coronoid process. We appreciate the clinical results with Broberg and Morrey scales and DASH.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 7 patients who underwent surgery, 4 had to be re-operated. The average functional outcome with Broberg and Morrey scale was fair, 77 (96-38) points, and the DASH was 30 (78-10). The range of flexion and extension was 96° (range 120-45°) and pronosupination of 126° (range 150-40°), mean supination of 57° (range 70-40°) and pronation 48.5° (range 60-30°).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In the terrible elbow tetrad the main challenge is the correct preoperative diagnosis and good results are obtained with a stable elbow through proper surgical planning, individualizing rebuilding and repairing articular surfaces and ligamentous structures in a single approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101114,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latinoamericana de Cirugía Ortopédica","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 14-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rslaot.2016.05.004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latinoamericana de Cirugía Ortopédica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444972516300043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective
To describe the terrible tetrad and treatment algorithm in patients and cadaver models to differentiate it from other entities that affect the distal elbow complex and the differences in their treatment.
Material and methodology
We studied 7 patients (5 women and 2 men) with a mean age of 51 years, who had had posterior or posterolateral elbow dislocation associated with fracture of coronoid process, radial head and olecranon. We reproduced the lesional association tetrad in 3 cadaveric specimens. Treatment included the reduction and stabilization of the coronoid process. We appreciate the clinical results with Broberg and Morrey scales and DASH.
Results
Of the 7 patients who underwent surgery, 4 had to be re-operated. The average functional outcome with Broberg and Morrey scale was fair, 77 (96-38) points, and the DASH was 30 (78-10). The range of flexion and extension was 96° (range 120-45°) and pronosupination of 126° (range 150-40°), mean supination of 57° (range 70-40°) and pronation 48.5° (range 60-30°).
Conclusion
In the terrible elbow tetrad the main challenge is the correct preoperative diagnosis and good results are obtained with a stable elbow through proper surgical planning, individualizing rebuilding and repairing articular surfaces and ligamentous structures in a single approach.