Being, Knowing, and Doing: Importing Theoretical Toolboxes for Autism Studies.

Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Monique Botha, Kristien Hens, Sarinah O'Donoghue, Amy Pearson, Anna Stenning
{"title":"Being, Knowing, and Doing: Importing Theoretical Toolboxes for Autism Studies.","authors":"Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Monique Botha, Kristien Hens, Sarinah O'Donoghue, Amy Pearson, Anna Stenning","doi":"10.1089/aut.2022.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this article was to think with and elaborate on theories developed outside of autism research and the autistic community, and through this support the production of new autistic-led theories: theories and concepts based on autistic people's own embodied experiences and the social worlds we inhabit. The article consists of three different sections all of part of the overall umbrella, <i>Being, knowing, and doing: Importing theoretical toolboxes for autism studies</i>. In each section, we import useful concepts from elsewhere and tailor them to autism studies. Throughout, we mingle our own autoethnographic accounts and shared discourse in relation to research accounts and theories. Illustrating <i>being</i>, we explore and discuss the possibilities of critical realism in autism studies. Illustrating <i>knowing</i>, we explore and discuss the possibilities of standpoint theory in autism studies. Finally, illustrating <i>doing</i>, we explore and discuss the possibilities of neurocosmopolitics including epistemic (in)justice in autism studies. Our proposal here is for an epistemic shift toward neurodiverse collaboration. We are inviting nonautistic people to work <i>with</i>, not <i>on</i>, us, aiming at to make autism research more ethical, breaking down bureaucratic structures, and questioning poor theory and shoddy methodology. Acknowledging intersecting axes of oppression in which an individual seeks to renegotiate and reimagine what it means to belong also means to understand what needs changing in society, as it is and how we might do things differently.</p>","PeriodicalId":72338,"journal":{"name":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","volume":"5 1","pages":"15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2022.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this article was to think with and elaborate on theories developed outside of autism research and the autistic community, and through this support the production of new autistic-led theories: theories and concepts based on autistic people's own embodied experiences and the social worlds we inhabit. The article consists of three different sections all of part of the overall umbrella, Being, knowing, and doing: Importing theoretical toolboxes for autism studies. In each section, we import useful concepts from elsewhere and tailor them to autism studies. Throughout, we mingle our own autoethnographic accounts and shared discourse in relation to research accounts and theories. Illustrating being, we explore and discuss the possibilities of critical realism in autism studies. Illustrating knowing, we explore and discuss the possibilities of standpoint theory in autism studies. Finally, illustrating doing, we explore and discuss the possibilities of neurocosmopolitics including epistemic (in)justice in autism studies. Our proposal here is for an epistemic shift toward neurodiverse collaboration. We are inviting nonautistic people to work with, not on, us, aiming at to make autism research more ethical, breaking down bureaucratic structures, and questioning poor theory and shoddy methodology. Acknowledging intersecting axes of oppression in which an individual seeks to renegotiate and reimagine what it means to belong also means to understand what needs changing in society, as it is and how we might do things differently.

存在、认知和行动:为自闭症研究导入理论工具箱。
这篇文章的目的是对自闭症研究和自闭症群体之外发展起来的理论进行思考和阐述,并以此支持自闭症主导的新理论的产生:这些理论和概念基于自闭症患者自身的体现性体验和我们所居住的社会世界。这篇文章由三个不同的部分组成,都属于 "存在、认知和行动 "这一总体框架的一部分:为自闭症研究导入理论工具箱。在每一部分中,我们都从其他地方引入了有用的概念,并将其用于自闭症研究。自始至终,我们将自己的自述和共同话语与研究叙述和理论相结合。在说明 "存在 "时,我们探讨并讨论了批判现实主义在自闭症研究中的可能性。在说明 "知 "时,我们探讨并讨论了立场论在自闭症研究中的可能性。最后,在说明 "行"(doing)时,我们探讨并讨论了神经世界政治学(neurocosmopolitics)的可能性,包括自闭症研究中的认识论(不)正义(epistemic (in) justice)。我们在此提出的建议是向神经多样性合作的认识论转变。我们邀请非自闭症患者与我们合作,而不是依靠我们,目的是使自闭症研究更符合伦理道德,打破官僚结构,质疑拙劣的理论和低劣的方法。承认相互交织的压迫轴,个人寻求重新谈判和重新想象归属感的含义,这也意味着要了解社会需要改变什么,社会的现状是什么,以及我们可以如何以不同的方式做事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信