C. Poncet-Wallet , Y. Ormezzano , E. Ernst , C. Toffin , R. Dhote , E. Harboun-Cohen , B. Frachet
{"title":"Extrusion cutanée à répétition d’un implant cochléaire","authors":"C. Poncet-Wallet , Y. Ormezzano , E. Ernst , C. Toffin , R. Dhote , E. Harboun-Cohen , B. Frachet","doi":"10.1016/j.aorl.2009.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>An observation of a difficult-to-diagnose complication of the cochlear implant: recurring cutaneous extrusion of a cochlear implant is reported.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>The history of an adult patient with total deafness is reported. She received an implant in her right ear in 1988, which was then explanted because of absence of hearing results. She received a second implant in her left ear in 2002, which was then explanted in 2007 because of cutaneous extrusion. In 2008, a second implant of a different brand was placed in her left ear, with the central part placed away from the first site, but extrusion recurred. A new attempt to encapsulate the central part with a hydroxyapatite box also ended in extrusion and was explanted in 2008.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Various diagnoses to explain these cutaneous problems were suggested during this clinical progression: infection, allergy, and a reaction to a foreign body. No hypothesis could be clearly ruled out.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cutaneous complications after cochlear implant are exceptional. As soon as cutaneous disorders appear, a rigorous diagnostic process must be followed so that the patient can be recommended a long-lasting solution to restore quality hearing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75509,"journal":{"name":"Annales d'oto-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico faciale : bulletin de la Societe d'oto-laryngologie des hopitaux de Paris","volume":"126 5","pages":"Pages 264-268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aorl.2009.07.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales d'oto-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico faciale : bulletin de la Societe d'oto-laryngologie des hopitaux de Paris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003438X09001078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective
An observation of a difficult-to-diagnose complication of the cochlear implant: recurring cutaneous extrusion of a cochlear implant is reported.
Patients and methods
The history of an adult patient with total deafness is reported. She received an implant in her right ear in 1988, which was then explanted because of absence of hearing results. She received a second implant in her left ear in 2002, which was then explanted in 2007 because of cutaneous extrusion. In 2008, a second implant of a different brand was placed in her left ear, with the central part placed away from the first site, but extrusion recurred. A new attempt to encapsulate the central part with a hydroxyapatite box also ended in extrusion and was explanted in 2008.
Results
Various diagnoses to explain these cutaneous problems were suggested during this clinical progression: infection, allergy, and a reaction to a foreign body. No hypothesis could be clearly ruled out.
Conclusion
Cutaneous complications after cochlear implant are exceptional. As soon as cutaneous disorders appear, a rigorous diagnostic process must be followed so that the patient can be recommended a long-lasting solution to restore quality hearing.