Clinical Outcomes of a Non-Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus IOL in Eyes with Mild Glaucoma.

IF 1.8 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Tanner J Ferguson, Caroline W Wilson, Brian M Shafer, John P Berdahl, Daniel C Terveen
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of a Non-Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus IOL in Eyes with Mild Glaucoma.","authors":"Tanner J Ferguson,&nbsp;Caroline W Wilson,&nbsp;Brian M Shafer,&nbsp;John P Berdahl,&nbsp;Daniel C Terveen","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S404369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical outcomes of a non-diffractive, wavefront-shaping extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) in eyes with mild open-angle glaucoma (OAG).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private practice; Sioux Falls, South Dakota.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, open-label, interventional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 52 eyes of 26 patients with mild OAG were enrolled and completed the study. All patients were bilaterally implanted with a non-diffractive, wavefront-shaping EDOF IOL. Seventy-seven percent of the patients were implanted with a trabecular microbypass stent at the time of surgery. Primary outcome measures included binocular corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity (CDVA and UDVA), uncorrected intermediate and near visual acuity (UIVA and UNVA) and contrast sensitivity as measured by a Pelli-Robson chart. A subjective questionnaire was also administered to patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 4 months postoperative, the mean binocular UDVA and CDVA was 0.03 ± 0.12 and -0.06 ± 0.07, respectively. The mean UIVA and UNVA were 0.18 ± 0.12 and 0.31 ± 0.18, respectively. Eighty-five percent of the subjects achieved ≥20/25 UDVA and 77% of the subjects achieved ≥20/32 UIVA at 4 months postoperative. The mean binocular mesopic contrast sensitivity was 1.76 ± 0.16 at a spatial frequency of 1 cycle-per-degree (cpd). Eighty-five percent of the subjects reported they would choose the same lens and 1 subject reported they would choose a different IOL if it meant reduced spectacle independence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The non-diffractive, wavefront-shaping EDOF IOL can be safely implanted in eyes with mild, pre-perimetric open-angle glaucoma with favorable uncorrected distance and intermediate visual acuity. The contrast sensitivity measurements were favorable and the subjective questionnaire revealed satisfactory spectacle independence and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"861-868"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/27/77/opth-17-861.PMC10024873.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S404369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of a non-diffractive, wavefront-shaping extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) in eyes with mild open-angle glaucoma (OAG).

Setting: Private practice; Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

Design: Prospective, open-label, interventional study.

Methods: In total, 52 eyes of 26 patients with mild OAG were enrolled and completed the study. All patients were bilaterally implanted with a non-diffractive, wavefront-shaping EDOF IOL. Seventy-seven percent of the patients were implanted with a trabecular microbypass stent at the time of surgery. Primary outcome measures included binocular corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity (CDVA and UDVA), uncorrected intermediate and near visual acuity (UIVA and UNVA) and contrast sensitivity as measured by a Pelli-Robson chart. A subjective questionnaire was also administered to patients.

Results: At 4 months postoperative, the mean binocular UDVA and CDVA was 0.03 ± 0.12 and -0.06 ± 0.07, respectively. The mean UIVA and UNVA were 0.18 ± 0.12 and 0.31 ± 0.18, respectively. Eighty-five percent of the subjects achieved ≥20/25 UDVA and 77% of the subjects achieved ≥20/32 UIVA at 4 months postoperative. The mean binocular mesopic contrast sensitivity was 1.76 ± 0.16 at a spatial frequency of 1 cycle-per-degree (cpd). Eighty-five percent of the subjects reported they would choose the same lens and 1 subject reported they would choose a different IOL if it meant reduced spectacle independence.

Conclusion: The non-diffractive, wavefront-shaping EDOF IOL can be safely implanted in eyes with mild, pre-perimetric open-angle glaucoma with favorable uncorrected distance and intermediate visual acuity. The contrast sensitivity measurements were favorable and the subjective questionnaire revealed satisfactory spectacle independence and patient satisfaction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

非衍射扩展焦深人工晶体治疗轻度青光眼的临床效果。
目的:评价无衍射波前整形扩展焦深人工晶状体(IOL)治疗轻度开角型青光眼(OAG)的临床效果。背景:私人执业;苏福尔斯,南达科他州。设计:前瞻性、开放标签、介入性研究。方法:选取26例轻度OAG患者共52眼完成研究。所有患者均双侧植入无衍射、波前成形的EDOF人工晶体。77%的患者在手术时植入了小梁微搭桥支架。主要结果测量包括双眼矫正和未矫正的距离视力(CDVA和UDVA),未矫正的中间和近视力(UIVA和UNVA)和对比敏感度(通过Pelli-Robson图表测量)。还对患者进行了主观问卷调查。结果:术后4个月双眼平均UDVA为0.03±0.12,CDVA为-0.06±0.07。UIVA平均值为0.18±0.12,UNVA平均值为0.31±0.18。术后4个月,85%的受试者UDVA≥20/25,77%的受试者uva≥20/32。平均双眼介观对比敏感度为1.76±0.16,空间频率为1周期/度(cpd)。85%的受试者报告说他们会选择相同的晶状体,1名受试者报告说如果这意味着降低了眼镜的独立性,他们会选择不同的人工晶体。结论:无衍射波前成形型EDOF人工晶状体可安全植入轻度周距前开角型青光眼,未矫正距离良好,视力中等。对比敏感度测量结果良好,主观问卷调查结果显示眼镜独立性和患者满意度较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical ophthalmology
Clinical ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
499
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信