FEEDBACK FROM NATURALISTIC DRIVING IMPROVES TREATMENT COMPLIANCE IN DRIVERS WITH OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA.

J. Dawson, Lixi Yu, N. Aksan, J. Tippin, M. Rizzo, S. Anderson
{"title":"FEEDBACK FROM NATURALISTIC DRIVING IMPROVES TREATMENT COMPLIANCE IN DRIVERS WITH OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA.","authors":"J. Dawson, Lixi Yu, N. Aksan, J. Tippin, M. Rizzo, S. Anderson","doi":"10.17077/DRIVINGASSESSMENT.1547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As part of a study in drivers with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), we conducted a randomized clinical trial to assess whether individualized feedback can increase compliance with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. After completing 3.5 months of naturalistic driving monitoring, OSA drivers were randomized either to receive an intervention, which was feedback regarding their own naturalistic driving record and CPAP compliance, or to receive no such intervention. In the week immediately after the intervention date, drivers receiving feedback (n=30) improved their CPAP usage by an average of 35.8 minutes per night (p=0.008; 95% CI=9.6, 62.0) to a mean level of 296 minutes. By contrast, CPAP usage in the non-feedback group (n=36) decreased an average of 27.5 minutes per night (p=0.022; 95% CI=4.0, 51.0) to a mean level of 236 minutes. The mean group-specific changes were higher (better) in the feedback group than in the non-feedback group during the first, second, and third weeks of follow-up (p<0.001, p=0.001, and p=0.027, respectively). By weeks 4 through 10, the effect of the feedback had lost its significance (p>0.25 in all cases). Our study suggests that CPAP compliance can be increased using individualized feedback, but that follow-up feedback sessions or reminders may be necessary for sustained improvement.","PeriodicalId":89225,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design","volume":"10 1","pages":"30-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17077/DRIVINGASSESSMENT.1547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As part of a study in drivers with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), we conducted a randomized clinical trial to assess whether individualized feedback can increase compliance with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. After completing 3.5 months of naturalistic driving monitoring, OSA drivers were randomized either to receive an intervention, which was feedback regarding their own naturalistic driving record and CPAP compliance, or to receive no such intervention. In the week immediately after the intervention date, drivers receiving feedback (n=30) improved their CPAP usage by an average of 35.8 minutes per night (p=0.008; 95% CI=9.6, 62.0) to a mean level of 296 minutes. By contrast, CPAP usage in the non-feedback group (n=36) decreased an average of 27.5 minutes per night (p=0.022; 95% CI=4.0, 51.0) to a mean level of 236 minutes. The mean group-specific changes were higher (better) in the feedback group than in the non-feedback group during the first, second, and third weeks of follow-up (p<0.001, p=0.001, and p=0.027, respectively). By weeks 4 through 10, the effect of the feedback had lost its significance (p>0.25 in all cases). Our study suggests that CPAP compliance can be increased using individualized feedback, but that follow-up feedback sessions or reminders may be necessary for sustained improvement.
自然驾驶的反馈提高了阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停司机的治疗依从性。
作为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)司机研究的一部分,我们进行了一项随机临床试验,以评估个性化反馈是否可以增加持续气道正压(CPAP)治疗的依从性。在完成3.5个月的自然驾驶监测后,OSA驾驶员被随机分为两组,一组接受干预,即反馈他们自己的自然驾驶记录和CPAP依从性,另一组不接受干预。在干预日期后的一周内,接受反馈的驾驶员(n=30)平均每晚将CPAP使用时间提高35.8分钟(p=0.008;95% CI=9.6, 62.0)至296分钟的平均水平。相比之下,非反馈组(n=36)的CPAP使用平均每晚减少27.5分钟(p=0.022;95% CI=4.0, 51.0)至236分钟的平均水平。在随访的第一、第二和第三周,反馈组的平均组特异性变化高于非反馈组(p < 0.25)。我们的研究表明,使用个性化反馈可以提高CPAP依从性,但后续反馈会议或提醒可能是持续改善所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信