Comparison of the effect of sleep hygiene education with the cognitive and behavioral method on the quality of sleep in elderly

Aliasghar Torabi, E. Ilali, Saeyedeh Olia Emadian, N. Mousavinasab
{"title":"Comparison of the effect of sleep hygiene education with the cognitive and behavioral method on the quality of sleep in elderly","authors":"Aliasghar Torabi, E. Ilali, Saeyedeh Olia Emadian, N. Mousavinasab","doi":"10.29252/joge.4.2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Being an elderly is associated with major changes in the quality and pattern of sleep. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of sleep hygiene education compared to cognitivebehavioral methodology on the quality of sleep in the elderly patients referred to daily care centers. Method: This is a quasi-experimental research conducted on two-groups of 80 elderly people referring to day care centers in Sari city. In one group, sleep health education was conducted and in the other group, cognitive-behavioral methodology was held. Eighty eligible elders were assigned to two groups of sleep hygiene education (40N) and cognitive-behavioral intervention (40N). Sleep quality was assessed by Pittsburgh sleep quality standard questionnaire before and after intervention. At the beginning of the study, questionnaires (demographic characteristics questionnaire and Pittsburgh sleep quality questionnaire) were completed in both groups. Data was analyzed by SPSS v. 20 and descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: The mean age of the samples was 66.15±4.22 in the cognitive behavioral group and it was 67.95±5.53 in the sleep hygiene education group. The mean and standard deviation of sleep quality of elderly people, before and after the cognitive behavioral method in the first group were 8.05 ± 3.651, 6.67 ± 2.66 respectively, the mean and standard deviation of sleep quality in the elderly before and after the sleep hygiene education in the second group were8.42 ± 3.39, 7.23 ± 2.454respectively. Comparison of the mean of sleep quality before and after intervention in both groups showed that the sleep quality of the elderly was significantly improved (P< 0.001). Given that the F statistics of covariance analysis test is significant (F (1.79) = 0.999, P = 0.321), Therefore, these two methods had the same effect on the overall quality of sleep in the elderly Conclusion: Considering that Cognitivebehavioral and sleep hygiene education method are an effective alternative to medication therapy replacement in the elderly, and each of the two methods have no side effects, it is recommended that, given the based on economic conditions and social facilities for the elderly, and facilities available to them. Each of these two alternatives is a substitute for hypnotics.","PeriodicalId":15922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gerontology","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/joge.4.2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Being an elderly is associated with major changes in the quality and pattern of sleep. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of sleep hygiene education compared to cognitivebehavioral methodology on the quality of sleep in the elderly patients referred to daily care centers. Method: This is a quasi-experimental research conducted on two-groups of 80 elderly people referring to day care centers in Sari city. In one group, sleep health education was conducted and in the other group, cognitive-behavioral methodology was held. Eighty eligible elders were assigned to two groups of sleep hygiene education (40N) and cognitive-behavioral intervention (40N). Sleep quality was assessed by Pittsburgh sleep quality standard questionnaire before and after intervention. At the beginning of the study, questionnaires (demographic characteristics questionnaire and Pittsburgh sleep quality questionnaire) were completed in both groups. Data was analyzed by SPSS v. 20 and descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: The mean age of the samples was 66.15±4.22 in the cognitive behavioral group and it was 67.95±5.53 in the sleep hygiene education group. The mean and standard deviation of sleep quality of elderly people, before and after the cognitive behavioral method in the first group were 8.05 ± 3.651, 6.67 ± 2.66 respectively, the mean and standard deviation of sleep quality in the elderly before and after the sleep hygiene education in the second group were8.42 ± 3.39, 7.23 ± 2.454respectively. Comparison of the mean of sleep quality before and after intervention in both groups showed that the sleep quality of the elderly was significantly improved (P< 0.001). Given that the F statistics of covariance analysis test is significant (F (1.79) = 0.999, P = 0.321), Therefore, these two methods had the same effect on the overall quality of sleep in the elderly Conclusion: Considering that Cognitivebehavioral and sleep hygiene education method are an effective alternative to medication therapy replacement in the elderly, and each of the two methods have no side effects, it is recommended that, given the based on economic conditions and social facilities for the elderly, and facilities available to them. Each of these two alternatives is a substitute for hypnotics.
睡眠卫生教育与认知行为法对老年人睡眠质量影响的比较
导读:老年人的睡眠质量和模式会发生重大变化。本研究的目的是确定睡眠卫生教育与认知行为方法对日常护理中心老年患者睡眠质量的影响。方法:这是一项准实验研究,以两组80名老年人为研究对象,涉及沙里市日托中心。一组采用睡眠健康教育,另一组采用认知行为方法。将80名符合条件的老年人分为睡眠卫生教育组(40N)和认知行为干预组(40N)。采用匹兹堡睡眠质量标准问卷评估干预前后的睡眠质量。研究开始时,两组均完成问卷调查(人口统计学特征问卷和匹兹堡睡眠质量问卷)。数据分析采用SPSS v. 20及描述性统计和推理统计。结果:认知行为组的平均年龄为66.15±4.22岁,睡眠卫生教育组的平均年龄为67.95±5.53岁。第一组老年人在认知行为教育前后的睡眠质量均值和标准差分别为8.05±3.651、6.67±2.66,第二组老年人在进行睡眠卫生教育前后的睡眠质量均值和标准差分别为8.42±3.39、7.23±2.454。两组干预前后睡眠质量均值比较,老年人睡眠质量明显改善(P< 0.001)。鉴于协方差分析检验的F统计量具有显著性(F (1.79) = 0.999, P = 0.321),因此两种方法对老年人整体睡眠质量的影响相同。考虑到认知行为和睡眠卫生教育方法是老年人药物治疗替代的有效替代方法,且两种方法均无副作用,建议基于老年人的经济条件和社会设施,以及老年人可利用的设施,进行认知行为和睡眠卫生教育。这两种选择中的每一种都是催眠药的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信