Ultrasonography for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

Muhiy Cheid Kadum Alkielabi
{"title":"Ultrasonography for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis","authors":"Muhiy Cheid Kadum Alkielabi","doi":"10.7439/IJBAR.V9I6.4765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is the comparison ultrasonography used as diagnostic tool preoperatively comparing it. Clinical assessment was used as diagnostic protocols.   \nStudy design: This is a prospective observational study comparing the adverse outcome in two different groups of patients admitted with suspected acute appendicitis. The first group l00 patients were managed without ultrasonography. In the second group we use routinely graded compression abdominal ultrasonography preoperatively. Diagnostic accuracy of the protocol in each group was measured statistically and rates of negative appendectomy and perforation were determined.    \nResult: Addition of routine ultrasonography in clinical assessment for acute appendicitis decrease the sensitivity but significantly increases the specificity of the protocol there by reducing the false positive rate translating into decrease negative appendicectomy rate. Rate of negative appendectomy was 22.5% in group one and 4.7% in group two. Perforation rate was 15.61 in group 1 and 15% in group 2. \nConclusion: Proper clinical assessment is the mainstay of diagnosis in acute appendicitis and by adding graded compression ultrasonography technique can improve the diagnostic accuracy and adverse outcome.","PeriodicalId":13848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"205-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBAR.V9I6.4765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is the comparison ultrasonography used as diagnostic tool preoperatively comparing it. Clinical assessment was used as diagnostic protocols.   Study design: This is a prospective observational study comparing the adverse outcome in two different groups of patients admitted with suspected acute appendicitis. The first group l00 patients were managed without ultrasonography. In the second group we use routinely graded compression abdominal ultrasonography preoperatively. Diagnostic accuracy of the protocol in each group was measured statistically and rates of negative appendectomy and perforation were determined.    Result: Addition of routine ultrasonography in clinical assessment for acute appendicitis decrease the sensitivity but significantly increases the specificity of the protocol there by reducing the false positive rate translating into decrease negative appendicectomy rate. Rate of negative appendectomy was 22.5% in group one and 4.7% in group two. Perforation rate was 15.61 in group 1 and 15% in group 2. Conclusion: Proper clinical assessment is the mainstay of diagnosis in acute appendicitis and by adding graded compression ultrasonography technique can improve the diagnostic accuracy and adverse outcome.
超声诊断急性阑尾炎
目的:探讨术前超声检查作为诊断工具的应用价值。临床评估作为诊断方案。研究设计:这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,比较两组疑似急性阑尾炎患者的不良结局。第一组100例患者不做超声检查。在第二组,我们使用常规分级压缩腹部超声术前。对每组方案的诊断准确性进行统计测量,并确定阴性阑尾切除术和穿孔率。结果:在急性阑尾炎的临床评估中,常规超声检查的增加降低了敏感性,但通过降低假阳性率转化为降低阑尾切除阴性率,显著提高了方案的特异性。第一组阑尾切除术阴性率为22.5%,第二组为4.7%。1组穿孔率15.61,2组穿孔率15%。结论:正确的临床评估是诊断急性阑尾炎的主要依据,采用分级压缩超声技术可提高诊断的准确性,减少不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信