Brexit’s potential impact on apparel manufacturing and luxury fashion

Jennifer H Worrell, Nancy Miller
{"title":"Brexit’s potential impact on apparel manufacturing and luxury fashion","authors":"Jennifer H Worrell, Nancy Miller","doi":"10.15406/jteft.2018.04.00171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In June 2016, the United Kingdom’s Article 50, commonly known as “Brexit,” passed. Many did not believe it would happen, but it did.1 In a speech at the Business of Fashion VOICES conference,2 Professor Alexander Betts of Oxford University gave his view of why the Article was passed and what it means to the fashion industry at large. He argued that Brexit occurred because of concerns over immigration and the desire for sovereignty. He showed that the voting map revealed those who voted for the withdrawal from the EU had experienced the loss of labor-intensive manufacturing jobs. He identified the demographics of those “Leave” voters as having less education, fewer socio-economic opportunities, and generally older in age. “Remain” voters, he noted, generally were better educated, cosmopolitan, and younger, but they did not turn out in large numbers to vote. He charged the fashion leaders to help the government create industrial policies that benefit the “hollowed out” manual labor sector of the country. He predicted that the EU would not experience a mass exodus of other countries and would eventually stabilize.","PeriodicalId":17152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Textile Engineering & Fashion Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Textile Engineering & Fashion Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jteft.2018.04.00171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In June 2016, the United Kingdom’s Article 50, commonly known as “Brexit,” passed. Many did not believe it would happen, but it did.1 In a speech at the Business of Fashion VOICES conference,2 Professor Alexander Betts of Oxford University gave his view of why the Article was passed and what it means to the fashion industry at large. He argued that Brexit occurred because of concerns over immigration and the desire for sovereignty. He showed that the voting map revealed those who voted for the withdrawal from the EU had experienced the loss of labor-intensive manufacturing jobs. He identified the demographics of those “Leave” voters as having less education, fewer socio-economic opportunities, and generally older in age. “Remain” voters, he noted, generally were better educated, cosmopolitan, and younger, but they did not turn out in large numbers to vote. He charged the fashion leaders to help the government create industrial policies that benefit the “hollowed out” manual labor sector of the country. He predicted that the EU would not experience a mass exodus of other countries and would eventually stabilize.
英国脱欧对服装制造业和奢侈品时尚的潜在影响
2016年6月,英国通过了第50条,俗称“脱欧”。许多人不相信它会发生,但它确实发生了牛津大学的亚历山大·贝茨教授在“时尚之声商业”会议上发表演讲,阐述了该条款通过的原因以及它对整个时尚行业的意义。他认为,英国脱欧是由于对移民的担忧和对主权的渴望。他表示,投票地图显示,投票支持脱欧的人经历了劳动密集型制造业工作岗位的流失。他指出,那些“脱欧”选民的人口结构是受教育程度较低,社会经济机会较少,而且年龄普遍较大。他指出,“留欧派”的选民通常受过更好的教育,来自世界各地,更年轻,但他们参加投票的人数并不多。他要求时尚领袖们帮助政府制定有利于该国“被掏空的”体力劳动部门的产业政策。他预测,欧盟不会经历其他国家的大规模外流,最终会稳定下来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信