Changing Pattern of Resistance in Typhoid Fever in An Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: Is It Time to Revisit Treatment Strategies?

S. Saxena, R. Kaur, V. Randhawa
{"title":"Changing Pattern of Resistance in Typhoid Fever in An Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: Is It Time to Revisit Treatment Strategies?","authors":"S. Saxena, R. Kaur, V. Randhawa","doi":"10.5799/JMID.897134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Multi-drug-resistant Salmonella Typhi is a major concern in the current era of antimicrobial resistance. The emergence of ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella Typhi strains (CRST) has left very few therapeutic options for the treatment of these infections. The objective of this study was to evaluate the typhoid cases diagnosed with CRST and retrospectively analyze the antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of Salmonella Typhi over the past three years. Methods: Laboratory data from our hospital were reviewed for the past three years to examine the trends related to the isolation of Salmonella Typhi from blood and their antimicrobial susceptibility. The case records from the patients whose blood culture detected Ceftriaxone resistant Salmonella Typhi (CRST) were reviewed to assess the clinical condition and outcome. Results: Analysis of the antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Typhi showed a decline in multidrug-resistant strains. Nalidixic acid resistance has remained high during this period. The resistance to ceftriaxone has shown an increase from 0% in 2016 to 11(12.6%) isolates in 2018. Also, azithromycin resistance has shown a steady increase from 0% in 2016, 3 (3.2%) in 2017 to 7 (8.5%) in 2018. There was no clustering of cases by time or space indicating a non-outbreak spread of ceftriaxone resistant strains. Conclusion: Development of resistance to ceftriaxone and azithromycin necessitates revision of therapeutic choices. All this necessitates an approach to do further extensive surveillance at the community level and improvement in hygiene, sanitation, and drinking water supply. Maybe it is time to revisit the older antibiotics such as ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, and chloramphenicol as therapeutic options for uncomplicated typhoid fever. J Microbiol Infect Dis 2021; 11(1):1-7.","PeriodicalId":16603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","volume":"250 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5799/JMID.897134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Multi-drug-resistant Salmonella Typhi is a major concern in the current era of antimicrobial resistance. The emergence of ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella Typhi strains (CRST) has left very few therapeutic options for the treatment of these infections. The objective of this study was to evaluate the typhoid cases diagnosed with CRST and retrospectively analyze the antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of Salmonella Typhi over the past three years. Methods: Laboratory data from our hospital were reviewed for the past three years to examine the trends related to the isolation of Salmonella Typhi from blood and their antimicrobial susceptibility. The case records from the patients whose blood culture detected Ceftriaxone resistant Salmonella Typhi (CRST) were reviewed to assess the clinical condition and outcome. Results: Analysis of the antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Typhi showed a decline in multidrug-resistant strains. Nalidixic acid resistance has remained high during this period. The resistance to ceftriaxone has shown an increase from 0% in 2016 to 11(12.6%) isolates in 2018. Also, azithromycin resistance has shown a steady increase from 0% in 2016, 3 (3.2%) in 2017 to 7 (8.5%) in 2018. There was no clustering of cases by time or space indicating a non-outbreak spread of ceftriaxone resistant strains. Conclusion: Development of resistance to ceftriaxone and azithromycin necessitates revision of therapeutic choices. All this necessitates an approach to do further extensive surveillance at the community level and improvement in hygiene, sanitation, and drinking water supply. Maybe it is time to revisit the older antibiotics such as ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, and chloramphenicol as therapeutic options for uncomplicated typhoid fever. J Microbiol Infect Dis 2021; 11(1):1-7.
抗生素耐药性时代伤寒耐药模式的变化:是时候重新审视治疗策略了吗?
目的:多重耐药伤寒沙门氏菌是当前抗菌素耐药性时代的一个主要问题。耐头孢曲松伤寒沙门氏菌菌株(CRST)的出现使得治疗这些感染的治疗选择非常少。本研究的目的是评估经CRST诊断的伤寒病例,并回顾性分析近3年来伤寒沙门菌的抗菌药物敏感性。方法:回顾我院近3年的实验室资料,分析血液中伤寒沙门菌的分离情况及药敏情况。对血培养检出头孢曲松耐药伤寒沙门氏菌(CRST)患者的病例记录进行回顾性分析,评价其临床情况和预后。结果:伤寒沙门菌药敏分析显示多重耐药菌株呈下降趋势。在此期间,对萘啶酸的抗性仍然很高。对头孢曲松的耐药性从2016年的0%增加到2018年的11株(12.6%)。此外,阿奇霉素耐药性稳步上升,从2016年的0%、2017年的3(3.2%)到2018年的7(8.5%)。没有时间或空间上的病例聚集表明头孢曲松耐药菌株的非暴发传播。结论:头孢曲松和阿奇霉素耐药的发展需要修改治疗方案。所有这些都需要采取一种方法,在社区一级进一步进行广泛的监测,并改善个人卫生、环境卫生和饮用水供应。也许现在是时候重新使用氨苄西林、复方新诺明和氯霉素等较老的抗生素作为治疗无并发症伤寒的选择了。中华微生物学杂志[J];11(1): 1 - 7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信