Comparison of sensitivity to fluconazole and itraconazole in patients with vaginal candidiasis referred to hospitals of Islamic Azad University, Tehran Medical Sciences

Roya Torkamani, Parvaneh AdimiNaghan, M. Rahimi
{"title":"Comparison of sensitivity to fluconazole and itraconazole in patients with vaginal candidiasis referred to hospitals of Islamic Azad University, Tehran Medical Sciences","authors":"Roya Torkamani, Parvaneh AdimiNaghan, M. Rahimi","doi":"10.52547/iau.32.2.157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Vaginal candidiasis is a common cause of vaginal infections. Currently, for treatment of these infections, fluconazole is prescribed more than other drugs; so determining the drug resistance of Candida to fluconazole and comparing it with itraconazole as a substitute has been one of the main objectives of this study. Materials and methods : Of 180 patients with symptoms of vaginal candidiasis, clinical examination, sampling and culture were performed. Candida albicans were identified by morphological and physiological methods and non- Candida albicans candida isolates by PCR-RFLP method. Susceptibility testing for antifungal drugs was performed by disk diffusion method based on CLSI M44-A protocol. Results : Out of 180 patients, 93 patients with positive culture and 98 strain of Candida were isolated. The mean age of patients was 30±0.73 years and the most common clinical complaints was itching (>98%) and vaginal discharge (88%). Candida albicans (80.61%) was the most common causative agent. The resistance of Candida albicans to fluconazole and itraconazole was 45.6% and 16.5%, respectively, and for non-albicans candida isolates were 53% and 42%, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.0001). Conclusion : The results of this study suggest that culturing of vaginal samples have essential role for diagnosis of vaginal candidiasis, and treatment with antifungal drugs should be performed after antifungal susceptibility tests.","PeriodicalId":18492,"journal":{"name":"MEDICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/iau.32.2.157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Vaginal candidiasis is a common cause of vaginal infections. Currently, for treatment of these infections, fluconazole is prescribed more than other drugs; so determining the drug resistance of Candida to fluconazole and comparing it with itraconazole as a substitute has been one of the main objectives of this study. Materials and methods : Of 180 patients with symptoms of vaginal candidiasis, clinical examination, sampling and culture were performed. Candida albicans were identified by morphological and physiological methods and non- Candida albicans candida isolates by PCR-RFLP method. Susceptibility testing for antifungal drugs was performed by disk diffusion method based on CLSI M44-A protocol. Results : Out of 180 patients, 93 patients with positive culture and 98 strain of Candida were isolated. The mean age of patients was 30±0.73 years and the most common clinical complaints was itching (>98%) and vaginal discharge (88%). Candida albicans (80.61%) was the most common causative agent. The resistance of Candida albicans to fluconazole and itraconazole was 45.6% and 16.5%, respectively, and for non-albicans candida isolates were 53% and 42%, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.0001). Conclusion : The results of this study suggest that culturing of vaginal samples have essential role for diagnosis of vaginal candidiasis, and treatment with antifungal drugs should be performed after antifungal susceptibility tests.
转诊至德黑兰伊斯兰阿扎德大学医院的阴道念珠菌病患者对氟康唑和伊曲康唑的敏感性比较
背景:阴道念珠菌病是阴道感染的常见原因。目前,在治疗这些感染方面,氟康唑比其他药物使用得更多;因此,确定念珠菌对氟康唑的耐药性并将其与伊曲康唑作为替代品进行比较是本研究的主要目的之一。材料与方法:对180例有阴道念珠菌病症状的患者进行临床检查、取样和培养。采用形态学和生理学方法鉴定白色念珠菌,采用PCR-RFLP方法鉴定非白色念珠菌分离株。药敏试验采用纸片扩散法,采用CLSI M44-A方案。结果:180例患者中,培养阳性93例,分离念珠菌98株。患者平均年龄30±0.73岁,最常见的临床主诉为瘙痒(>98%)和阴道分泌物(88%)。白色念珠菌(80.61%)是最常见的病原体。白色念珠菌对氟康唑和伊曲康唑的耐药率分别为45.6%和16.5%,对非白色念珠菌的耐药率分别为53%和42%。差异有统计学意义(P<0.0001)。结论:阴道标本培养对阴道念珠菌病的诊断有重要作用,应在进行抗真菌药敏试验后给予抗真菌药物治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信