Analysis of Roof Failure at the Intersections on a Coal Mining

A. Zingano, Marcelo Andrade
{"title":"Analysis of Roof Failure at the Intersections on a Coal Mining","authors":"A. Zingano, Marcelo Andrade","doi":"10.4236/jmmce.2021.95033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this paper is to understand the behavior of the roof and the cause of roof failure of a coal mining. Eleven roof falls occurred in the mine section in sequence. All the roof falls were surveyed, and the geological features were determined which include rock type, mechanical properties, and thickness. The immediate roof thickness was interpolated to determine the cause of the roof failures which was the inappropriate roof support where the immediate roof is thicker. The average thickness of the immediate roof was determined by the drilling log in 1.2 m (3.9 ft.). The roof support was design based on the average thickness, and the bolt length is 1.5 m (4.9 ft.) in suspension. The challenge was to estimate where the immediate roof gets thicker and to design the support considered to maintain the regular bolt length. This is because the cost and productivity of support operation could increase if the bolt length changes as the roof thickness changes. The idea was to adjust the support for beam building with a fully grouted bolt and rearrange the bolt geometry to keep the roof stable. It means, with the same bolt length the type of roof support would change from suspension to beam building depending on when the roof gets thicker. Two empirical approaches were considered to design the roof support: 1) CMRR and 2) RMR. The entry width is 5 m and the roof support was designed with four bolts per row. Where the roof support must change to beam building, the number of bolts per row changes to five or six. The results of the design and application on underground showed that the approach keeps stable.","PeriodicalId":16488,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2021.95033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to understand the behavior of the roof and the cause of roof failure of a coal mining. Eleven roof falls occurred in the mine section in sequence. All the roof falls were surveyed, and the geological features were determined which include rock type, mechanical properties, and thickness. The immediate roof thickness was interpolated to determine the cause of the roof failures which was the inappropriate roof support where the immediate roof is thicker. The average thickness of the immediate roof was determined by the drilling log in 1.2 m (3.9 ft.). The roof support was design based on the average thickness, and the bolt length is 1.5 m (4.9 ft.) in suspension. The challenge was to estimate where the immediate roof gets thicker and to design the support considered to maintain the regular bolt length. This is because the cost and productivity of support operation could increase if the bolt length changes as the roof thickness changes. The idea was to adjust the support for beam building with a fully grouted bolt and rearrange the bolt geometry to keep the roof stable. It means, with the same bolt length the type of roof support would change from suspension to beam building depending on when the roof gets thicker. Two empirical approaches were considered to design the roof support: 1) CMRR and 2) RMR. The entry width is 5 m and the roof support was designed with four bolts per row. Where the roof support must change to beam building, the number of bolts per row changes to five or six. The results of the design and application on underground showed that the approach keeps stable.
某煤矿十字路口顶板破坏分析
本文的目的是了解某煤矿顶板的受力状况及顶板破坏原因。该矿段先后发生11次顶板垮塌。对所有顶板陷落进行了调查,并确定了地质特征,包括岩石类型、力学性质和厚度。通过对直接顶板厚度的插值,确定了直接顶板较厚处顶板支护不合理是导致顶板破坏的原因。直接顶板的平均厚度由1.2米(3.9英尺)的钻井测井确定。顶板支架的设计基于平均厚度,锚杆悬挂长度为1.5米(4.9英尺)。挑战在于评估直接顶板变厚的位置,并设计考虑保持常规螺栓长度的支撑。这是因为如果锚杆长度随着顶板厚度的变化而变化,支护作业的成本和生产率可能会增加。这个想法是用一个完全注浆的螺栓来调整梁式建筑的支撑,并重新安排螺栓的几何形状,以保持屋顶的稳定。这意味着,在螺栓长度相同的情况下,屋顶支撑的类型将根据屋顶的厚度从悬架变为梁式建筑。考虑了两种经验方法设计顶板支护:1)CMRR和2)RMR。入口宽度为5米,屋顶支撑设计为每排4个螺栓。在屋顶支撑必须改为梁式建筑的地方,每排螺栓的数量改为5或6个。地下工程的设计和应用结果表明,该方法稳定可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信