In vitro Analysis of the Hemostatic Properties of Whole Blood Products Prepared with a Platelet-Sparing Leukoreduction Filter.

M D Zielinski, J R Stubbs, S F Polites, A Xue, Dal Haugen, R Emery, D H Jenkins, M S Park
{"title":"<i>In vitro</i> Analysis of the Hemostatic Properties of Whole Blood Products Prepared with a Platelet-Sparing Leukoreduction Filter.","authors":"M D Zielinski, J R Stubbs, S F Polites, A Xue, Dal Haugen, R Emery, D H Jenkins, M S Park","doi":"10.4172/2572-9462.1000124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Warm fresh whole blood (WFWB) is an ideal resuscitation fluid for exsanguinating patients but there are myriad logistic and infectious issues associated with its use. Cold whole blood (CWB) may be an acceptable alternative to the reconstituted whole blood (RWB), the current standard of care. A leukoreduction filter has been developed which maintains platelet count while eliminating white blood cells but its effect on platelet function is unknown. We hypothesize that CWB will retain an acceptable functional coagulation profile after filtration and over time.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>WFWB and CWB samples were obtained from eight donors and four units of RWB were created. The quantitative and qualitative <i>in vitro</i> coagulation profiles of WFWB, RWB, and CWB over time were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Filtration was successful at removing white blood cells (5.5 ± 1.2 <i>vs.</i> 0.3 ± 0.3 × 10<sup>6</sup>/L) while retaining an adequate platelet count (172.0 ± 47.0 to 166.0 ± 42.3 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L) and hemoglobin concentration (13.7 ± 0.5 <i>vs.</i> 13.0 ± 0.7 g/dL). Rotational Thromboelastography (ROTEM) results revealed a similar clotting time (CT) before and after filtration (64.9 ± 5.1 <i>vs.</i> 64.1 ± 6.8 s) but a decreased maximum clot firmness (MCF) (58.6 ± 4.2 <i>vs.</i> 54.9 ± 4.6 mm). Platelet aggregation decreased substantially (28.8 ± 6.7 <i>vs.</i> 9.3 ± 2.1 ohm) immediately after filtration. CWB function continued to diminish over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CWB holds great promise as a surrogate for WFWB, but use of a platelet-sparing LR filter diminishes platelet function almost immediately after filtration.</p>","PeriodicalId":73994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thrombosis and circulation: open access","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/a2/nihms-945725.PMC10022254.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thrombosis and circulation: open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2572-9462.1000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Warm fresh whole blood (WFWB) is an ideal resuscitation fluid for exsanguinating patients but there are myriad logistic and infectious issues associated with its use. Cold whole blood (CWB) may be an acceptable alternative to the reconstituted whole blood (RWB), the current standard of care. A leukoreduction filter has been developed which maintains platelet count while eliminating white blood cells but its effect on platelet function is unknown. We hypothesize that CWB will retain an acceptable functional coagulation profile after filtration and over time.

Study design and methods: WFWB and CWB samples were obtained from eight donors and four units of RWB were created. The quantitative and qualitative in vitro coagulation profiles of WFWB, RWB, and CWB over time were compared.

Results: Filtration was successful at removing white blood cells (5.5 ± 1.2 vs. 0.3 ± 0.3 × 106/L) while retaining an adequate platelet count (172.0 ± 47.0 to 166.0 ± 42.3 × 109/L) and hemoglobin concentration (13.7 ± 0.5 vs. 13.0 ± 0.7 g/dL). Rotational Thromboelastography (ROTEM) results revealed a similar clotting time (CT) before and after filtration (64.9 ± 5.1 vs. 64.1 ± 6.8 s) but a decreased maximum clot firmness (MCF) (58.6 ± 4.2 vs. 54.9 ± 4.6 mm). Platelet aggregation decreased substantially (28.8 ± 6.7 vs. 9.3 ± 2.1 ohm) immediately after filtration. CWB function continued to diminish over time.

Conclusion: CWB holds great promise as a surrogate for WFWB, but use of a platelet-sparing LR filter diminishes platelet function almost immediately after filtration.

Abstract Image

体外分析使用稀释血小板的白细胞生成过滤器制备的全血产品的止血特性。
背景:温热新鲜全血(WFWB)是对失血患者进行抢救的理想液体,但在使用过程中存在许多后勤和感染问题。冷全血(CWB)可能是目前标准疗法--重组全血(RWB)的一种可接受的替代品。目前已开发出一种白细胞减少过滤器,它能在去除白细胞的同时维持血小板数量,但其对血小板功能的影响尚不清楚。我们假设,CWB 在过滤后并随着时间的推移将保持可接受的凝血功能曲线:研究设计和方法:从八名捐献者处获得 WFWB 和 CWB 样品,并制作了四个单位的 RWB。比较了 WFWB、RWB 和 CWB 随时间变化的定量和定性体外凝血曲线:结果:过滤成功去除了白细胞(5.5 ± 1.2 vs. 0.3 ± 0.3 × 106/L),同时保留了足够的血小板计数(172.0 ± 47.0 至 166.0 ± 42.3 × 109/L)和血红蛋白浓度(13.7 ± 0.5 vs. 13.0 ± 0.7 g/dL)。旋转血栓弹性成像(ROTEM)结果显示,过滤前后的凝血时间(CT)相似(64.9 ± 5.1 对 64.1 ± 6.8 秒),但最大凝块硬度(MCF)下降(58.6 ± 4.2 对 54.9 ± 4.6 毫米)。过滤后,血小板聚集立即大幅减少(28.8 ± 6.7 对 9.3 ± 2.1 欧姆)。随着时间的推移,CWB 功能继续减弱:结论:CWB 很有希望成为 WFWB 的替代物,但使用节省血小板的 LR 过滤器几乎会在过滤后立即降低血小板功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信