Managing Gas Well Blowouts: Case Studies from Assam-Arakan & Krishna-Godavari Basin

R. Bharadwaj, Bhavya Kumari, Astha Patel
{"title":"Managing Gas Well Blowouts: Case Studies from Assam-Arakan & Krishna-Godavari Basin","authors":"R. Bharadwaj, Bhavya Kumari, Astha Patel","doi":"10.2118/206602-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n E&P activities are the early stage of energy production and pivotal for generating and sustaining economic growth. However, negligence and evaluating the circumstances incorrectly during these operations can lead to calamities like blowouts. This paper discusses two such tragedies, the Pasarlapudi (Krishna-Godavari) Gas Well Blowout of 1995 & Baghjan (Assam-Arakan) Oil Field Blowout of 2020, and provides possible well control measures and lessons learned.\n Pasarlapudi blowout incident occurred during the drilling operations. The pipe stuck-up situation at 2727m MD (Measured Depth) was detected by conducting a stretch test. Further analysis could include circulating brine, checking lost circulation and identifying casing leaks by measuring Sustained Casing Pressure (SCP), Operator-imposed Pressure (OIP), and Thermal-induced Pressure (TIP). Baghjan's gas well at the depth 3870m was producing at 2.8-3.5 MMSCFD. The aim was to plug the lower producing zone and recomplete the well in the upper Lakadong+Therria sand zone. Well was killed using brine, cement plug was placed and BOP installed. BOP was removed after the plug was set to begin the process of moving the workover rig. Well blew gas profusely during this process.\n Simulating a blowout and facing one, are two completely different situations. In Pasarlapudi's case, the well blew with an enormous gas pressure of 281.2 ± 0.5 kg/cm2. While drilling the production hole (8.5 inch), either differential pressure sticking, presence of water-swelling clay formation or the partial collapse of wellbore formation caused the pipe stuck-up situation. By conducting stretch test along with circulating brine, root cause of this problem could be identified. If differential sticking occurred, lost circulation could be checked & cured, while keeping the hole full. Circulating brine should solve the problem of swelling clay formation while formation collapse could have occurred due to the presence of plastic formation like salt domes.\n In the case of Baghjan gas well blowout during workover operations, probable safety measures could include placement of 2 or 3 backup cement plugs along with kill fluid or going for squeeze cementing before placing the cement plug & kill fluid while abandoning the lower producing zone. Attempts were made to bring the well under control by adequate water spraying, installing BOP. Water was pumped through the casing valve and a water reservoir was dug near the well plinth for the placement of pumps of 2500 gallon capacity.\n Proper safety measures should be used even when they're not the cheapest to avoid repetition of treatments and detrimental situations. SCP, OIP and TIP should be measured periodically whenever possible and the root cause of situations like lost circulation, pipe stuck-ups, kicks, casing leaks should be identified before proceeding towards drastic remedial operations. Innovations in countering well-control situations should be promoted invariably.","PeriodicalId":10970,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/206602-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

E&P activities are the early stage of energy production and pivotal for generating and sustaining economic growth. However, negligence and evaluating the circumstances incorrectly during these operations can lead to calamities like blowouts. This paper discusses two such tragedies, the Pasarlapudi (Krishna-Godavari) Gas Well Blowout of 1995 & Baghjan (Assam-Arakan) Oil Field Blowout of 2020, and provides possible well control measures and lessons learned. Pasarlapudi blowout incident occurred during the drilling operations. The pipe stuck-up situation at 2727m MD (Measured Depth) was detected by conducting a stretch test. Further analysis could include circulating brine, checking lost circulation and identifying casing leaks by measuring Sustained Casing Pressure (SCP), Operator-imposed Pressure (OIP), and Thermal-induced Pressure (TIP). Baghjan's gas well at the depth 3870m was producing at 2.8-3.5 MMSCFD. The aim was to plug the lower producing zone and recomplete the well in the upper Lakadong+Therria sand zone. Well was killed using brine, cement plug was placed and BOP installed. BOP was removed after the plug was set to begin the process of moving the workover rig. Well blew gas profusely during this process. Simulating a blowout and facing one, are two completely different situations. In Pasarlapudi's case, the well blew with an enormous gas pressure of 281.2 ± 0.5 kg/cm2. While drilling the production hole (8.5 inch), either differential pressure sticking, presence of water-swelling clay formation or the partial collapse of wellbore formation caused the pipe stuck-up situation. By conducting stretch test along with circulating brine, root cause of this problem could be identified. If differential sticking occurred, lost circulation could be checked & cured, while keeping the hole full. Circulating brine should solve the problem of swelling clay formation while formation collapse could have occurred due to the presence of plastic formation like salt domes. In the case of Baghjan gas well blowout during workover operations, probable safety measures could include placement of 2 or 3 backup cement plugs along with kill fluid or going for squeeze cementing before placing the cement plug & kill fluid while abandoning the lower producing zone. Attempts were made to bring the well under control by adequate water spraying, installing BOP. Water was pumped through the casing valve and a water reservoir was dug near the well plinth for the placement of pumps of 2500 gallon capacity. Proper safety measures should be used even when they're not the cheapest to avoid repetition of treatments and detrimental situations. SCP, OIP and TIP should be measured periodically whenever possible and the root cause of situations like lost circulation, pipe stuck-ups, kicks, casing leaks should be identified before proceeding towards drastic remedial operations. Innovations in countering well-control situations should be promoted invariably.
气井井喷管理:来自Assam-Arakan和Krishna-Godavari盆地的案例研究
勘探开发活动是能源生产的早期阶段,对于产生和维持经济增长至关重要。然而,在这些操作过程中,疏忽和对环境的错误评估可能导致井喷等灾难。本文讨论了1995年的Pasarlapudi (Krishna-Godavari)气井井喷和2020年的Baghjan (Assam-Arakan)油田井喷这两起悲剧,并提供了可能的井控措施和经验教训。Pasarlapudi井喷事故发生在钻井作业期间。在2727m MD(实测深度)处,通过拉伸试验检测管道的卡钻情况。进一步的分析包括循环盐水、检查漏失以及通过测量套管持续压力(SCP)、作业者施加压力(OIP)和热致压力(TIP)来识别套管泄漏。Baghjan的气井深度为3870m,产量为2.8-3.5 MMSCFD。目的是封堵下部产层,并在Lakadong+Therria砂层上部重新完井。使用盐水压井,放置水泥塞,安装防喷器。坐封桥塞后,拆下防喷器,开始移动修井机。在这一过程中,油井大量放出气体。模拟井喷和面对井喷是两种完全不同的情况。在Pasarlapudi的案例中,该井产生了281.2±0.5 kg/cm2的巨大气体压力。在钻生产井(8.5英寸)时,可能是压差卡钻、水膨胀粘土地层存在或井筒地层部分坍塌导致管柱卡钻。通过与循环盐水一起进行拉伸测试,可以找出问题的根本原因。如果发生压差卡钻,可以检查并修复漏失,同时保持井眼满度。循环盐水可以解决粘土地层膨胀的问题,而由于盐丘等塑性地层的存在,可能会导致地层坍塌。对于在修井作业期间发生的Baghjan气井井喷,可能采取的安全措施包括:放置2或3个备用水泥塞和压井液,或者在放置水泥塞和压井液之前进行挤压固井,同时放弃较低的生产区域。通过适当的喷水和安装防喷器,试图控制油井。通过套管阀抽水,并在井底附近挖了一个蓄水池,放置2500加仑容量的水泵。即使不是最便宜的,也应该采取适当的安全措施,以避免重复治疗和有害情况。只要有可能,就应该定期测量SCP、OIP和TIP,并在采取严厉的补救措施之前,确定漏失、管柱卡钻、井涌、套管泄漏等情况的根本原因。应对井控形势的创新应不断推进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信