Impact of High-Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation on Health Care Resource Use and Economic Outcomes in Adult Patients With Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis in the United States

Martha E. Camacho Urribarri RN, BSN, Brian C. Becker MEd RRT, Angela C. Murray MNA, BScN, RN
{"title":"Impact of High-Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation on Health Care Resource Use and Economic Outcomes in Adult Patients With Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis in the United States","authors":"Martha E. Camacho Urribarri RN, BSN,&nbsp;Brian C. Becker MEd RRT,&nbsp;Angela C. Murray MNA, BScN, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2023.100013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Airway clearance therapy is prescribed to patients with bronchiectasis, but limited evidence exists demonstrating the effectiveness of medical device treatment options.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>What is the impact of high-frequency chest wall oscillation therapy (HFCWO) on health care resource use (HCRU) and economic outcomes in patients with bronchiectasis in the United States?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>A retrospective pre-post cohort study was conducted using the PharMetrics Health Plan Claims Database. The study included commercially insured adult patients with bronchiectasis receiving HFCWO between January 2009 and February 2018. Health care claims were compared 12 months before and after initiation of HFCWO. End points included all-cause and disease-specific HCRU and costs. Comparisons were conducted using McNemar’s test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for continuous variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 255 patients were included. Mean age was 55.6 years, and 58% were high risk. Compared with baseline, significant reductions in all-cause hospital length of stay (9 vs 6 days; <em>P</em> = .05), oral antibiotics (89% vs 80%; <em>P</em> = .002), IV antibiotics (12% vs 6%; <em>P</em> = .01), and radiology examinations (96% vs 92%; <em>P</em> = .03) were observed. For disease-specific outcomes, significant reductions in hospitalizations (8% vs 3%; <em>P</em> = .004), acute exacerbations (7% vs 2%; <em>P</em> = .007), outpatient physician office visits (87% vs 78%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), radiology examinations (58% vs 34%; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001), and laboratory services (51% vs 38%; <em>P</em> = .001) were found. Significant reductions in disease-specific costs were identified, including inpatient hospitalizations, pulmonologist visits, and radiology examinations; however, despite these reductions, all-cause total cost data were similar for both periods because of the cost of the device.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>HFCWO therapy is associated with lower HCRU 12 months after initiation of therapy. Further health economic studies are required to determine if cost savings offset cost of the device after 1 year.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789223000132/pdfft?md5=3f04f8259c0dba311e3480e1933e9e1c&pid=1-s2.0-S2949789223000132-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789223000132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Airway clearance therapy is prescribed to patients with bronchiectasis, but limited evidence exists demonstrating the effectiveness of medical device treatment options.

Research Question

What is the impact of high-frequency chest wall oscillation therapy (HFCWO) on health care resource use (HCRU) and economic outcomes in patients with bronchiectasis in the United States?

Study Design and Methods

A retrospective pre-post cohort study was conducted using the PharMetrics Health Plan Claims Database. The study included commercially insured adult patients with bronchiectasis receiving HFCWO between January 2009 and February 2018. Health care claims were compared 12 months before and after initiation of HFCWO. End points included all-cause and disease-specific HCRU and costs. Comparisons were conducted using McNemar’s test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for continuous variables.

Results

A total of 255 patients were included. Mean age was 55.6 years, and 58% were high risk. Compared with baseline, significant reductions in all-cause hospital length of stay (9 vs 6 days; P = .05), oral antibiotics (89% vs 80%; P = .002), IV antibiotics (12% vs 6%; P = .01), and radiology examinations (96% vs 92%; P = .03) were observed. For disease-specific outcomes, significant reductions in hospitalizations (8% vs 3%; P = .004), acute exacerbations (7% vs 2%; P = .007), outpatient physician office visits (87% vs 78%; P < .001), radiology examinations (58% vs 34%; P < .0001), and laboratory services (51% vs 38%; P = .001) were found. Significant reductions in disease-specific costs were identified, including inpatient hospitalizations, pulmonologist visits, and radiology examinations; however, despite these reductions, all-cause total cost data were similar for both periods because of the cost of the device.

Interpretation

HFCWO therapy is associated with lower HCRU 12 months after initiation of therapy. Further health economic studies are required to determine if cost savings offset cost of the device after 1 year.

高频胸壁振荡对美国非囊性纤维化支气管扩张症成人患者医疗资源使用和经济效益的影响
研究背景支气管扩张症患者可接受气道通畅疗法,但证明医疗器械治疗方案有效性的证据有限。研究问题高频胸壁振荡疗法(HFCWO)对美国支气管扩张症患者的医疗资源使用(HCRU)和经济效益有何影响?研究设计和方法使用 PharMetrics 健康计划索赔数据库开展了一项回顾性前后队列研究。研究对象包括 2009 年 1 月至 2018 年 2 月期间接受 HFCWO 治疗的商业保险成年支气管扩张症患者。对开始使用 HFCWO 前后 12 个月的医疗索赔进行了比较。终点包括全因和疾病特异性 HCRU 和费用。对分类变量采用 McNemar 检验,对连续变量采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行比较。平均年龄为 55.6 岁,58% 为高危人群。与基线相比,全因住院时间(9 天 vs 6 天;P = .05)、口服抗生素(89% vs 80%;P = .002)、静脉注射抗生素(12% vs 6%;P = .01)和放射检查(96% vs 92%;P = .03)均有明显缩短。在疾病特异性结果方面,住院率(8% vs 3%;P = .004)、急性加重率(7% vs 2%;P = .007)、门诊医生诊疗率(87% vs 78%;P <;.001)、放射检查率(58% vs 34%;P <;.0001)和实验室服务率(51% vs 38%;P = .001)均有显著下降。发现疾病特异性成本显著降低,包括住院、肺病专家就诊和放射检查;然而,尽管这些成本有所降低,但由于设备成本的原因,两个时期的全因总成本数据相似。需要进一步开展健康经济学研究,以确定一年后节省的费用是否能抵消设备的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信