Initial treatment of elderly population with aggressive lymphoma: a narrative review of current evidence and future directions

Behzad Amoozgar, B. Kahl
{"title":"Initial treatment of elderly population with aggressive lymphoma: a narrative review of current evidence and future directions","authors":"Behzad Amoozgar, B. Kahl","doi":"10.21037/aol-22-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), a subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), is commonly diagnosed in older individuals, and its mortality directly correlates with age. Despite recent advancements in treatment modalities for DLBCL, there is no universally accepted approach for elderly patients. R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) has remained the core therapy for decades but has higher toxicity and lower cure rates in the senior subgroup. This review article discusses the strategies for frailty assessment and subcategorization of the elderly population based on multidomain assessment tools. Further, it outlines potential regimens for the initial treatment of DLBCL based on different levels of frailty. Methods: We conducted a thorough literature review via PubMed and Google Scholars databases to identify the most relevant articles on our subject. Publication dates or languages did not limit our search methodology. Key Content and Findings: The older population is a heterogeneous group with different degrees of frailty and diminished functional reserve. Coexisting comorbidities in the elderly create additional management challenges. The lack of a global and comprehensive functionality assessment guideline is an area of unmet need. Despite these challenges, R-CHOP, or R-CHOP with modified components, and other chemoimmunotherapy regimens that were investigated as frontline therapies in elderly DLBCL have resulted in promising outcomes, particularly if the investigators carefully subcategorized the studied population using multidomain functionality assessment guidelines and consistently followed up with the patients. Conclusions: R-CHOP is still considered the best initial treatment for the senior population 60–80 years old, but with careful genetic and functionality classifications. We recommend attenuated and modified versions of R-CHOP, such as R-miniCHOP, as an alternative option for the fit elderly over >80 years. For elderly patients with cardiac co-morbidities, R-CEOP (substituting doxorubicin with etoposide in R-CHOP) has proven to have curative potential. For fit, unfit, and frail, very elderly DLBCL patients ( ≥ 85 and mostly ≥ 90 years), initial treatment options remain challenging, and patients may be best served with a palliative approach. 13 doxorubicin patients received across all cycles. The study investigated the influence of IDI and RDI with factors including age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), CIRS-G score, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), tumor bulkiness, hemoglobulin level, and albumin on outcomes for DLBCL patients years. each","PeriodicalId":72224,"journal":{"name":"Annals of lymphoma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aol-22-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and Objective: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), a subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), is commonly diagnosed in older individuals, and its mortality directly correlates with age. Despite recent advancements in treatment modalities for DLBCL, there is no universally accepted approach for elderly patients. R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) has remained the core therapy for decades but has higher toxicity and lower cure rates in the senior subgroup. This review article discusses the strategies for frailty assessment and subcategorization of the elderly population based on multidomain assessment tools. Further, it outlines potential regimens for the initial treatment of DLBCL based on different levels of frailty. Methods: We conducted a thorough literature review via PubMed and Google Scholars databases to identify the most relevant articles on our subject. Publication dates or languages did not limit our search methodology. Key Content and Findings: The older population is a heterogeneous group with different degrees of frailty and diminished functional reserve. Coexisting comorbidities in the elderly create additional management challenges. The lack of a global and comprehensive functionality assessment guideline is an area of unmet need. Despite these challenges, R-CHOP, or R-CHOP with modified components, and other chemoimmunotherapy regimens that were investigated as frontline therapies in elderly DLBCL have resulted in promising outcomes, particularly if the investigators carefully subcategorized the studied population using multidomain functionality assessment guidelines and consistently followed up with the patients. Conclusions: R-CHOP is still considered the best initial treatment for the senior population 60–80 years old, but with careful genetic and functionality classifications. We recommend attenuated and modified versions of R-CHOP, such as R-miniCHOP, as an alternative option for the fit elderly over >80 years. For elderly patients with cardiac co-morbidities, R-CEOP (substituting doxorubicin with etoposide in R-CHOP) has proven to have curative potential. For fit, unfit, and frail, very elderly DLBCL patients ( ≥ 85 and mostly ≥ 90 years), initial treatment options remain challenging, and patients may be best served with a palliative approach. 13 doxorubicin patients received across all cycles. The study investigated the influence of IDI and RDI with factors including age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), CIRS-G score, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), tumor bulkiness, hemoglobulin level, and albumin on outcomes for DLBCL patients years. each
老年人群侵袭性淋巴瘤的初始治疗:当前证据和未来方向的叙述性回顾
背景与目的:弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)是非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的一种亚型,常见于老年人,其死亡率与年龄直接相关。尽管最近DLBCL的治疗方式取得了进展,但对于老年患者尚无普遍接受的治疗方法。R-CHOP(利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和强的松)几十年来一直是核心治疗方法,但在老年亚组中毒性较高,治愈率较低。本文综述了基于多领域评估工具的老年人口脆弱性评估和分类策略。此外,它概述了基于不同虚弱程度的DLBCL初始治疗的潜在方案。方法:我们通过PubMed和Google学者数据库进行了全面的文献综述,以确定与我们主题最相关的文章。出版日期或语言没有限制我们的搜索方法。关键内容和发现:老年人群是一个异质性群体,具有不同程度的虚弱和功能储备下降。老年人共存的合并症带来了额外的管理挑战。缺乏全面和全面的功能评估指南是一个未满足需求的领域。尽管存在这些挑战,R-CHOP或改良成分的R-CHOP和其他化疗免疫治疗方案作为老年DLBCL的一线治疗方法进行了研究,结果很有希望,特别是如果研究人员使用多域功能评估指南仔细地对研究人群进行了细分,并对患者进行了持续的随访。结论:R-CHOP仍被认为是60-80岁老年人群的最佳初始治疗方案,但需要仔细进行遗传和功能分类。我们推荐R-CHOP的减毒和改良版本,如R-miniCHOP,作为80岁以上健康老年人的替代选择。对于有心脏合并症的老年患者,R-CEOP (R-CHOP用依托泊苷替代阿霉素)已被证明具有治疗潜力。对于健康、不健康和虚弱的高龄DLBCL患者(≥85岁,大多数≥90岁),初始治疗方案仍然具有挑战性,患者可能最好采用姑息治疗方法。13例患者接受了所有周期的阿霉素治疗。本研究探讨了年龄、东部肿瘤合作组表现状态(ECOG PS)、CIRS-G评分、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、肿瘤体积、血红蛋白水平、白蛋白等因素对DLBCL患者预后的影响。每一个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信