A Study on the Evaluation and Selection of Korean Language arts Textbooks of In-service Korean Language Teacher

S. Choi
{"title":"A Study on the Evaluation and Selection of Korean Language arts Textbooks of In-service Korean Language Teacher","authors":"S. Choi","doi":"10.14333/kjte.2023.39.4.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose is to find problems derived from the elements and selection process and waysto improve them. Considering that the 2022 revised Korean language curriculum has further expandedthe type and number of high school elective courses in preparation for the high school credit systemin preparation for the 2015 revised curriculum. \nMethods: For this purpose, this study conducted Focus Group Interviews (FGIs) with 9 Koreanlanguage teachers who had participated in the evaluation and selection of Korean language textbooksin unit schools based on the revised 2015 Korean language curriculum. \nResults: 1) Korean language teachers mainly adopted the “overall textbook evaluation approach” dueto the high burden of evaluation in the process of selecting and evaluating Korean language textbooks. 2) Variables influencing the evaluation and selection process of Korean language textbooks included “appropriate sanctions”, “adequate amount of learning content”, “various teaching and learning activitiesand availability of supplementary materials”, as well as “authors and publishers”. 3) The primaryproblems identified in the selection and evaluation of Korean language textbooks under the verificationand approval system were the excessive amount of textbooks to be evaluated, resulting in “excessivecontent and insufficient evaluation time”, and the emergence of “complex and abstract textbookevaluation criteria”. \nConclusion: Proposed solutions to address these issues include “securing evaluation time andsimplifying procedures” and “providing and utilizing objective textbook information for each publisher”.","PeriodicalId":22672,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Korean Teacher Education","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Korean Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14333/kjte.2023.39.4.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose is to find problems derived from the elements and selection process and waysto improve them. Considering that the 2022 revised Korean language curriculum has further expandedthe type and number of high school elective courses in preparation for the high school credit systemin preparation for the 2015 revised curriculum. Methods: For this purpose, this study conducted Focus Group Interviews (FGIs) with 9 Koreanlanguage teachers who had participated in the evaluation and selection of Korean language textbooksin unit schools based on the revised 2015 Korean language curriculum. Results: 1) Korean language teachers mainly adopted the “overall textbook evaluation approach” dueto the high burden of evaluation in the process of selecting and evaluating Korean language textbooks. 2) Variables influencing the evaluation and selection process of Korean language textbooks included “appropriate sanctions”, “adequate amount of learning content”, “various teaching and learning activitiesand availability of supplementary materials”, as well as “authors and publishers”. 3) The primaryproblems identified in the selection and evaluation of Korean language textbooks under the verificationand approval system were the excessive amount of textbooks to be evaluated, resulting in “excessivecontent and insufficient evaluation time”, and the emergence of “complex and abstract textbookevaluation criteria”. Conclusion: Proposed solutions to address these issues include “securing evaluation time andsimplifying procedures” and “providing and utilizing objective textbook information for each publisher”.
在职韩语教师韩语美术教材评价与选择研究
目的:目的是发现元素和选择过程中产生的问题和改进方法。考虑到2022年修订的韩国语课程为准备2015年修订的韩国语课程,进一步扩大了高中选修课程的种类和数量,以适应高中学分制。方法:为此,本研究采用焦点小组访谈法(Focus Group Interviews, FGIs)对9名参与2015年修订的韩国语课程中各单元学校韩国语教材评价与选择的教师进行访谈。结果:1)语文教师在选择和评价语文教材的过程中,由于评价负担较大,主要采用“整体教材评价法”。2)影响韩语教材评价和选择过程的变量包括“适当的制裁”、“足够的学习内容”、“各种教与学活动和补充材料的可用性”以及“作者和出版商”。3)审批制下韩国语教科书的选择与评价中发现的主要问题是被评价的教科书数量过多,导致“内容过多,评价时间不足”,出现“教科书评价标准复杂抽象”。结论:建议解决这些问题的解决方案包括“确保评估时间和简化程序”以及“为每个出版商提供和利用客观的教科书信息”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信