Prognostic value of the Weiss and Wieneke (AFIP) scoring systems in pediatric ACC - a mini review.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Maria Riedmeier, Lester D R Thompson, Carlos Augusto Fernandes Molina, Boris Decarolis, Christoph Härtel, Paul-G Schlegel, Martin Fassnacht, Verena Wiegering
{"title":"Prognostic value of the Weiss and Wieneke (AFIP) scoring systems in pediatric ACC - a mini review.","authors":"Maria Riedmeier,&nbsp;Lester D R Thompson,&nbsp;Carlos Augusto Fernandes Molina,&nbsp;Boris Decarolis,&nbsp;Christoph Härtel,&nbsp;Paul-G Schlegel,&nbsp;Martin Fassnacht,&nbsp;Verena Wiegering","doi":"10.1530/ERC-22-0259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Histopathological differentiation in pediatric adrenocortical carcinoma (pACC) is difficult and clinical prediction and stratification scores are not evaluated yet. Therefore, this review aims to summarize current evidence on the value and accuracy of the two commonly used scoring systems (Weiss/Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP)) pACC. On this base, one might be able to evaluate if patients may benefit from a unique scoring system. For this, we performed a systematic review of the published literature and included 128 patients in our analysis. The majority (72%) of the pACCs had a good clinical course. The follow-up time ranged from 0 to 420 months with a mean age of 5.6 years at diagnosis. Patients with a good clinical course were younger (mean 4.8 years) than patients with a poor outcome (mean 7.6 years). Comparing the two scoring systems, the specificity of the Weiss score was very low (25%), whereas the sensitivity was 100%. According to the AFIP score, specificity (77%) was higher than the Weiss score, whereas the sensitivity of the AFIP score was minimal lower with 92%. Age differences were recognizable as the specificity was lower in infants <4 years (20%) than in older children (32%). In contrast, the specificity of the AFIP score was higher in infants <4 years (82%) than in older age groups (76%). Summarizing our results, we could show that the Weiss score is not a suitable tool for the prediction of malignancy in pACC in comparison with the AFIP score, but further efforts may seek to ensure early and accurate stratification through augmented scoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":11654,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine-related cancer","volume":"30 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine-related cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-22-0259","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Histopathological differentiation in pediatric adrenocortical carcinoma (pACC) is difficult and clinical prediction and stratification scores are not evaluated yet. Therefore, this review aims to summarize current evidence on the value and accuracy of the two commonly used scoring systems (Weiss/Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP)) pACC. On this base, one might be able to evaluate if patients may benefit from a unique scoring system. For this, we performed a systematic review of the published literature and included 128 patients in our analysis. The majority (72%) of the pACCs had a good clinical course. The follow-up time ranged from 0 to 420 months with a mean age of 5.6 years at diagnosis. Patients with a good clinical course were younger (mean 4.8 years) than patients with a poor outcome (mean 7.6 years). Comparing the two scoring systems, the specificity of the Weiss score was very low (25%), whereas the sensitivity was 100%. According to the AFIP score, specificity (77%) was higher than the Weiss score, whereas the sensitivity of the AFIP score was minimal lower with 92%. Age differences were recognizable as the specificity was lower in infants <4 years (20%) than in older children (32%). In contrast, the specificity of the AFIP score was higher in infants <4 years (82%) than in older age groups (76%). Summarizing our results, we could show that the Weiss score is not a suitable tool for the prediction of malignancy in pACC in comparison with the AFIP score, but further efforts may seek to ensure early and accurate stratification through augmented scoring.

Weiss和Wieneke (AFIP)评分系统在儿科ACC中的预后价值——一个小型综述。
小儿肾上腺皮质癌(pACC)的组织病理学鉴别是困难的,临床预测和分层评分尚未评估。因此,本综述旨在总结目前两种常用评分系统(Weiss/Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP)) pACC的价值和准确性。在此基础上,人们可以评估患者是否可以从一个独特的评分系统中受益。为此,我们对已发表的文献进行了系统回顾,并将128例患者纳入我们的分析。大多数(72%)的pACCs具有良好的临床病程。随访时间为0 ~ 420个月,诊断时平均年龄5.6岁。临床病程较好的患者(平均4.8岁)比预后较差的患者(平均7.6岁)年轻。比较两种评分系统,Weiss评分的特异性很低(25%),而敏感性为100%。根据AFIP评分,特异性(77%)高于Weiss评分,而AFIP评分的敏感性最低,为92%。由于特异性在婴儿中较低,因此可以识别年龄差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrine-related cancer
Endocrine-related cancer 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Endocrine-Related Cancer is an official flagship journal of the Society for Endocrinology and is endorsed by the European Society of Endocrinology, the United Kingdom and Ireland Neuroendocrine Society, and the Japanese Hormones and Cancer Society. Endocrine-Related Cancer provides a unique international forum for the publication of high quality original articles describing novel, cutting edge basic laboratory, translational and clinical investigations of human health and disease focusing on endocrine neoplasias and hormone-dependent cancers; and for the publication of authoritative review articles in these topics. Endocrine neoplasias include adrenal cortex, breast, multiple endocrine neoplasia, neuroendocrine tumours, ovary, prostate, paraganglioma, parathyroid, pheochromocytoma pituitary, testes, thyroid and hormone-dependent cancers. Neoplasias affecting metabolism and energy production such as bladder, bone, kidney, lung, and head and neck, are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信