Prevalence of Ocular Surface Disease and Corneal Irregularity and Outcomes in Patients Using Therapeutic Scleral Lenses at a Tertiary Care Center.

Angelica C. Scanzera, Sneha Bontu, C. Joslin, T. McMahon, M. Rosenblatt, Ellen Shorter
{"title":"Prevalence of Ocular Surface Disease and Corneal Irregularity and Outcomes in Patients Using Therapeutic Scleral Lenses at a Tertiary Care Center.","authors":"Angelica C. Scanzera, Sneha Bontu, C. Joslin, T. McMahon, M. Rosenblatt, Ellen Shorter","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000000679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo describe indications for scleral contact lens (ScCL) evaluation, previous treatments, and outcomes of patients prescribed ScCL at a tertiary referral center.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis retrospective study reviewed 133 patients evaluated for ScCL between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2015, at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) Contact Lens Service. Patient demographics, ocular history, indications for evaluation, previous treatments, presence of punctate epithelial erosions, number of lenses ordered, follow-up visits, best-corrected visual acuity before ScCL, and visual acuity with ScCL were evaluated. Patients were categorized based on primary indication for ScCL evaluation as ocular surface disease (OSD) or corneal irregularity (CI). The primary outcome was visual acuity.\n\n\nRESULTS\nVisual acuity improved from logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution 0.3±0.4 at presentation to 0.1±0.2 with ScCL in all eyes (n=223, P=0.0001), and from 0.3±0.5 to 0.1±0.2 (n=164, P=0.001) in the OSD group and 0.5±0.4 to 0.2±0.2 (n=59, P=0.0001) in the CI group. Seventy percent of patients were evaluated for bilateral ScCL evaluation. Indication for ScCL evaluation was OSD in 71% (n=95) of patients, with 20% having a secondary diagnosis of CI. Corneal irregularity was the primary diagnosis in 29% of patients (n=38), with 50% having a secondary diagnosis of OSD.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOcular surface disease was common in this tertiary referral patient population and was a primary or secondary indication for ScCL evaluation in 85.7% (n=114) of patients evaluated for ScCL. Scleral contact lenses improved visual outcomes in patients with both primary diagnoses of CI and OSD.","PeriodicalId":12216,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To describe indications for scleral contact lens (ScCL) evaluation, previous treatments, and outcomes of patients prescribed ScCL at a tertiary referral center. METHODS This retrospective study reviewed 133 patients evaluated for ScCL between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2015, at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) Contact Lens Service. Patient demographics, ocular history, indications for evaluation, previous treatments, presence of punctate epithelial erosions, number of lenses ordered, follow-up visits, best-corrected visual acuity before ScCL, and visual acuity with ScCL were evaluated. Patients were categorized based on primary indication for ScCL evaluation as ocular surface disease (OSD) or corneal irregularity (CI). The primary outcome was visual acuity. RESULTS Visual acuity improved from logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution 0.3±0.4 at presentation to 0.1±0.2 with ScCL in all eyes (n=223, P=0.0001), and from 0.3±0.5 to 0.1±0.2 (n=164, P=0.001) in the OSD group and 0.5±0.4 to 0.2±0.2 (n=59, P=0.0001) in the CI group. Seventy percent of patients were evaluated for bilateral ScCL evaluation. Indication for ScCL evaluation was OSD in 71% (n=95) of patients, with 20% having a secondary diagnosis of CI. Corneal irregularity was the primary diagnosis in 29% of patients (n=38), with 50% having a secondary diagnosis of OSD. CONCLUSIONS Ocular surface disease was common in this tertiary referral patient population and was a primary or secondary indication for ScCL evaluation in 85.7% (n=114) of patients evaluated for ScCL. Scleral contact lenses improved visual outcomes in patients with both primary diagnoses of CI and OSD.
三级保健中心使用治疗性巩膜镜片患者的眼表疾病和角膜不规则的患病率及结果
目的描述三级转诊中心巩膜接触镜(ScCL)评估的适应症、既往治疗和患者处方ScCL的结果。方法:本回顾性研究回顾了2010年1月1日至2015年12月31日在伊利诺伊大学芝加哥分校(UIC)隐形眼镜服务中心接受ScCL评估的133例患者。评估患者的人口统计学、眼部病史、评估指征、既往治疗、点状上皮糜烂的存在、晶状体的数量、随访、ScCL前的最佳矫正视力以及ScCL患者的视力。根据ScCL评估的主要指征是眼表疾病(OSD)或角膜不规则(CI),对患者进行分类。主要结果是视力。结果ScCL患者的视力从出现时的最小分辨角的对数0.3±0.4提高到0.1±0.2 (n=223, P=0.0001), OSD组从0.3±0.5提高到0.1±0.2 (n=164, P=0.001), CI组从0.5±0.4提高到0.2±0.2 (n=59, P=0.0001)。70%的患者进行了双侧ScCL评估。71% (n=95)患者的ScCL评估指征为OSD, 20%的患者继发诊断为CI。29%的患者(n=38)的主要诊断是角膜不规则,50%的患者继发诊断为OSD。结论:在三级转诊患者群体中,眼表疾病很常见,在接受ScCL评估的患者中,85.7% (n=114)的眼表疾病是ScCL评估的主要或次要指征。巩膜隐形眼镜改善了原发性CI和OSD患者的视力结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信