Safe radiological spinal intervention: A multicenter snapshot survey of musculoskeletal radiologists in the UK and India

A. Aslam, K. Iyengar, G. Sharma, R. Botchu
{"title":"Safe radiological spinal intervention: A multicenter snapshot survey of musculoskeletal radiologists in the UK and India","authors":"A. Aslam, K. Iyengar, G. Sharma, R. Botchu","doi":"10.25259/ijms_183_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nResearch, knowledge, and technological advances have promoted minimally invasive image-guided diagnostic and therapeutic intervention. Such interventions are increasingly performed for musculoskeletal diseases by radiologists within outpatient settings. The objective of this study was to ascertain levels of safe practice among musculoskeletal radiologists in the United Kingdom and the Indian public health-care system, as defined by access to spinal surgeons and anesthetists during radiological spinal procedures.\n\n\n\nAn online cross-sectional survey of eight questions (multiple choice and free text) was circulated among musculoskeletal radiologists in the UK and India, to evaluate: (i) Image-guided practice among musculoskeletal radiologists. (ii) Types of interventions undertaken. (iii) Practice setting. (iv) Availability of supportive, backup access to spinal surgery services.\n\n\n\nA total of 53 replies were received of which 43 (81.1%) were from musculoskeletal radiologists who perform spinal interventional procedures. Spinal biopsies and injections were the most common procedures performed by the 43 eligible radiologists (79.1% and 74.4%, respectively), with vertebroplasty and sacroplasty performed by only 16.3% and 11.6%, respectively. Less than half (46.5%) of musculoskeletal radiologists performing interventional procedures did so within a hospital setting with both a spinal surgeon and an anesthetist on site, 20.9% had an anesthetist on site but no spinal surgeon and 16.3% had neither on-site.\n\n\n\nMinimally invasive image-guided diagnostic and therapeutic intervention is a niche sub-specialty practiced by a few musculoskeletal radiologists. Enhanced resource allocation, skills training, and multidisciplinary service provision will ultimately minimize existing deficiencies, improving patient-related clinical outcomes, and quality of care.\n","PeriodicalId":13277,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of medical sciences","volume":"208 1-2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijms_183_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research, knowledge, and technological advances have promoted minimally invasive image-guided diagnostic and therapeutic intervention. Such interventions are increasingly performed for musculoskeletal diseases by radiologists within outpatient settings. The objective of this study was to ascertain levels of safe practice among musculoskeletal radiologists in the United Kingdom and the Indian public health-care system, as defined by access to spinal surgeons and anesthetists during radiological spinal procedures. An online cross-sectional survey of eight questions (multiple choice and free text) was circulated among musculoskeletal radiologists in the UK and India, to evaluate: (i) Image-guided practice among musculoskeletal radiologists. (ii) Types of interventions undertaken. (iii) Practice setting. (iv) Availability of supportive, backup access to spinal surgery services. A total of 53 replies were received of which 43 (81.1%) were from musculoskeletal radiologists who perform spinal interventional procedures. Spinal biopsies and injections were the most common procedures performed by the 43 eligible radiologists (79.1% and 74.4%, respectively), with vertebroplasty and sacroplasty performed by only 16.3% and 11.6%, respectively. Less than half (46.5%) of musculoskeletal radiologists performing interventional procedures did so within a hospital setting with both a spinal surgeon and an anesthetist on site, 20.9% had an anesthetist on site but no spinal surgeon and 16.3% had neither on-site. Minimally invasive image-guided diagnostic and therapeutic intervention is a niche sub-specialty practiced by a few musculoskeletal radiologists. Enhanced resource allocation, skills training, and multidisciplinary service provision will ultimately minimize existing deficiencies, improving patient-related clinical outcomes, and quality of care.
安全放射脊柱干预:在英国和印度的肌肉骨骼放射科医生的多中心快照调查
研究、知识和技术进步促进了微创图像引导诊断和治疗干预。这种干预越来越多地执行肌肉骨骼疾病的放射科医生在门诊设置。本研究的目的是确定英国和印度公共卫生保健系统中肌肉骨骼放射科医生的安全操作水平,根据放射脊柱手术期间脊柱外科医生和麻醉师的使用情况来定义。在英国和印度的肌肉骨骼放射科医生中进行了一项包含八个问题(选择题和自由文本)的在线横断面调查,以评估:(i)肌肉骨骼放射科医生的图像指导实践。所采取的干预措施的种类。(iii)练习设置。㈣是否有获得脊柱手术服务的支助和后备途径。我们共收到53份答复,其中43份(81.1%)来自从事脊柱介入手术的肌肉骨骼放射科医师。43名合资格放射科医生最常进行的手术是脊柱活检和注射(分别为79.1%和74.4%),椎体成形术和骶骨成形术分别仅占16.3%和11.6%。不到一半(46.5%)的肌肉骨骼放射科医生在有脊柱外科医生和麻醉师在场的医院进行介入手术,20.9%有麻醉师在场但没有脊柱外科医生,16.3%两者都没有。微创图像引导诊断和治疗干预是少数肌肉骨骼放射科医师实践的小众亚专业。加强资源分配、技能培训和多学科服务提供,最终将最大限度地减少现有的不足,改善与患者相关的临床结果和护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信