Understanding Forest Landowner Attitudes, Perceived Risk, and Response to Emerald Ash Borer in Kentucky

R. Adhikari, N. Poudyal, T. Ochuodho, Rajan Parajuli, Omkar Joshi, Sayeed R. Mehmood, J. Munsell, Gaurav Dhungel, W. Thomas, E. Crocker, Mo Zhou
{"title":"Understanding Forest Landowner Attitudes, Perceived Risk, and Response to Emerald Ash Borer in Kentucky","authors":"R. Adhikari, N. Poudyal, T. Ochuodho, Rajan Parajuli, Omkar Joshi, Sayeed R. Mehmood, J. Munsell, Gaurav Dhungel, W. Thomas, E. Crocker, Mo Zhou","doi":"10.1093/jofore/fvac040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Emerald ash borer (EAB) (Agrilus planipennis), an invasive nonnative beetle, is responsible for the mortality of ash trees in the eastern and midwestern United States. Despite efforts to contain this beetle through various control options, human-induced spread of EAB has caused damage to ash forests in many states. Because most ash trees are under private ownership, it is important to understand how landowners evaluate the risk of EAB and perceive the effectiveness of various control options. A mail survey of private forest landowners was conducted in Kentucky in 2020 to assess their awareness and perception of various control options of EAB infestation. Results from this survey suggest that landowners are concerned about EAB and the associated increased risks, reduced quality of scenic views, and increased cleanup costs. Landowners experiencing EAB infestation believed that EAB management needs collective actions and that current efforts by government agencies are not sufficient. However, few landowners are taking actions themselves to manage EAB on their property. These findings shed light on the extent to which landowners are concerned about EAB impact and emphasize the need for development of effective control options and outreach programs to increase landowner engagement and actions in EAB control and management.\n Study implications: This study assessed forest landowners’ knowledge and attitudes about emerald ash borer (EAB) and their perceptions on the effectiveness of various control options. The majority of landowners who have EAB on their property expressed concerns about safety and aesthetics but were generally pessimistic about control efforts. Our results highlight the need for additional efforts to not only increase the adoption rate of possible EAB control options but also develop new ways to effectively manage EAB. Additionally, tailored outreach programs are critical to increase landowner engagement in controlling EAB infestation and the management of other similar forest health threats in the future.","PeriodicalId":23386,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","volume":"191 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvac040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emerald ash borer (EAB) (Agrilus planipennis), an invasive nonnative beetle, is responsible for the mortality of ash trees in the eastern and midwestern United States. Despite efforts to contain this beetle through various control options, human-induced spread of EAB has caused damage to ash forests in many states. Because most ash trees are under private ownership, it is important to understand how landowners evaluate the risk of EAB and perceive the effectiveness of various control options. A mail survey of private forest landowners was conducted in Kentucky in 2020 to assess their awareness and perception of various control options of EAB infestation. Results from this survey suggest that landowners are concerned about EAB and the associated increased risks, reduced quality of scenic views, and increased cleanup costs. Landowners experiencing EAB infestation believed that EAB management needs collective actions and that current efforts by government agencies are not sufficient. However, few landowners are taking actions themselves to manage EAB on their property. These findings shed light on the extent to which landowners are concerned about EAB impact and emphasize the need for development of effective control options and outreach programs to increase landowner engagement and actions in EAB control and management. Study implications: This study assessed forest landowners’ knowledge and attitudes about emerald ash borer (EAB) and their perceptions on the effectiveness of various control options. The majority of landowners who have EAB on their property expressed concerns about safety and aesthetics but were generally pessimistic about control efforts. Our results highlight the need for additional efforts to not only increase the adoption rate of possible EAB control options but also develop new ways to effectively manage EAB. Additionally, tailored outreach programs are critical to increase landowner engagement in controlling EAB infestation and the management of other similar forest health threats in the future.
了解肯塔基州森林土地所有者的态度、感知风险和对翡翠灰蛀虫的反应
绿灰螟(EAB) (Agrilus planipennis)是一种外来入侵甲虫,是造成美国东部和中西部白蜡树死亡的主要原因。尽管通过各种控制方法努力控制这种甲虫,但人为引起的EAB传播已经对许多州的灰林造成了损害。由于大多数白蜡树属于私人所有,因此了解土地所有者如何评估EAB的风险并了解各种控制方案的有效性是很重要的。2020年,在肯塔基州对私人森林土地所有者进行了一项邮件调查,以评估他们对EAB侵扰的各种控制方案的认识和看法。这项调查的结果表明,土地所有者担心EAB及其相关的风险增加、景观质量下降和清理成本增加。遭受害虫侵扰的土地所有者认为,害虫管理需要集体行动,目前政府机构的努力是不够的。然而,很少有土地所有者自己采取行动来管理他们财产上的环境污染。这些发现揭示了土地所有者对EAB影响的关注程度,并强调需要制定有效的控制方案和外展计划,以增加土地所有者在EAB控制和管理方面的参与和行动。研究意义:本研究评估了森林土地所有者对绿灰螟虫(EAB)的知识和态度,以及他们对各种控制方案有效性的看法。大多数拥有EAB的土地所有者表达了对安全性和美观性的担忧,但对控制措施普遍持悲观态度。我们的研究结果强调了需要额外的努力,不仅要提高可能的EAB控制方案的采用率,还要开发有效管理EAB的新方法。此外,量身定制的外展计划对于提高土地所有者在控制EAB侵扰和未来管理其他类似森林健康威胁方面的参与度至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信