{"title":"THE INTERVENTIONS TO IMPROVE STANDARD PRECAUTIONS (SP) KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE AMONG HEALTHCARE WORKERS (HCWS): A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW","authors":"R. Waramlah, B. Huda","doi":"10.32827/ijphcs.6.3.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Standard Precautions (SP) is the basic requirement in infection control measures to reduce healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) as well occupational infection in healthcare settings. Many interventions have been done to increase the knowledge and practice of SP among healthcare workers (HCWs). Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of interventions to improve knowledge and practice on Standard Precautions among HCWs. Materials and Methods: Articles were searched through Pubmed, Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar search engines using keywords “Standard Precautions OR infection control AND interventional study OR experimental study”. Types of studies included are randomised control trials of individuals, cluster-randomised trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-after studies, and cross sectional study. Only articles written in English published from 2010 to 2018 and accessible as free full texts were included in this review. The articles must evaluate the multiple components of Standard Precautions simultaneously. Result: There are 14 articles included in this study. Most of the studies implemented educational and training intervention with or without infection control support. Other intervention strategies were theory-based module, self-instructed computer module with clinical case simulation, checklist and coloured cues for communication enhancement as well as Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Initiative (CHAIPI). However, different studies used different measures to assess the knowledge and practice of Standard Precautions among HCWs. Conclusion: Because of this heterogeneity, it is difficult to draw a clear conclusion about the effectiveness of different interventions. However, it was shown that interventions do promote Standard Precautions knowledge and practice, but further research is warranted to determine which interventions are the most effective. Keywords: Standard Precautions, intervention, healthcare workers, knowledge, practice.","PeriodicalId":14315,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32827/ijphcs.6.3.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Standard Precautions (SP) is the basic requirement in infection control measures to reduce healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) as well occupational infection in healthcare settings. Many interventions have been done to increase the knowledge and practice of SP among healthcare workers (HCWs). Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of interventions to improve knowledge and practice on Standard Precautions among HCWs. Materials and Methods: Articles were searched through Pubmed, Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar search engines using keywords “Standard Precautions OR infection control AND interventional study OR experimental study”. Types of studies included are randomised control trials of individuals, cluster-randomised trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-after studies, and cross sectional study. Only articles written in English published from 2010 to 2018 and accessible as free full texts were included in this review. The articles must evaluate the multiple components of Standard Precautions simultaneously. Result: There are 14 articles included in this study. Most of the studies implemented educational and training intervention with or without infection control support. Other intervention strategies were theory-based module, self-instructed computer module with clinical case simulation, checklist and coloured cues for communication enhancement as well as Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Initiative (CHAIPI). However, different studies used different measures to assess the knowledge and practice of Standard Precautions among HCWs. Conclusion: Because of this heterogeneity, it is difficult to draw a clear conclusion about the effectiveness of different interventions. However, it was shown that interventions do promote Standard Precautions knowledge and practice, but further research is warranted to determine which interventions are the most effective. Keywords: Standard Precautions, intervention, healthcare workers, knowledge, practice.
背景:标准预防措施(SP)是感染控制措施的基本要求,以减少卫生保健相关感染(HAIs)以及卫生保健环境中的职业感染。已经采取了许多干预措施,以增加保健工作者(HCWs)对SP的认识和实践。目的:评估干预措施的有效性,以提高卫生保健工作者对标准预防措施的认识和实践。材料和方法:通过Pubmed、Medline、Scopus和Google Scholar搜索引擎,检索关键词为“Standard measures OR infection control and interventional study OR experimental study”。研究类型包括个体随机对照试验、集群随机试验、非随机试验、前后对照研究和横断面研究。本综述只收录了2010年至2018年发表的英文文章,并提供免费全文。文章必须同时评估标准预防措施的多个组成部分。结果:本研究共纳入14篇文献。大多数研究实施了教育和培训干预,有或没有感染控制支持。其他的干预策略包括:以理论为基础的模块、以临床个案模拟为基础的电脑自学模块、加强沟通的核对表和彩色提示,以及医疗保健相关感染预防行动(CHAIPI)。然而,不同的研究使用不同的措施来评估卫生保健工作者对标准预防措施的了解和实践。结论:由于这种异质性,很难对不同干预措施的有效性得出明确的结论。然而,研究表明,干预措施确实促进了标准预防措施的知识和实践,但需要进一步研究以确定哪些干预措施最有效。关键词:标准预防措施,干预,医护人员,知识,实践。