Improving posture: Comparing Segmental Stretch and Muscular Chains Therapy

José Luís Pimentel do Rosário, Inês Yoshie Nakashima, Konstantine Rizopoulos, Dimitrios Kostopoulos, Amélia Pasqual Marques
{"title":"Improving posture: Comparing Segmental Stretch and Muscular Chains Therapy","authors":"José Luís Pimentel do Rosário,&nbsp;Inês Yoshie Nakashima,&nbsp;Konstantine Rizopoulos,&nbsp;Dimitrios Kostopoulos,&nbsp;Amélia Pasqual Marques","doi":"10.1016/j.clch.2012.10.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span><span>Muscular Chains Therapy (MCT), which uses postural positions for global stretching, and Segmental Stretch Technique (SST), which stretches one muscle at a time, are two static stretching techniques currently used to improve, correct and treat postural imbalances. Aiming to identify which of these two techniques is most effective in order to improve standing posture, 30 women between 21 and 30 years old were evaluated and divided into three groups of 10 participants each: The SST group, the MCT Group and the Control Group (CG). Postures were evaluated before and after treatment through digital </span>photographs<span>. After transferring the images to the computer, tracings were made with Corel Draw software using six marked anatomical points: intertragic notch; anterior part of the lateral border of the </span></span>acromion<span>; suprasternal notch; posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS); anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS); the inferior angle of the scapula; and right </span></span>lateral malleolus. The two experimental groups underwent eight sessions of stretching, twice a week, for about 30</span> <!-->min each session. The MCT Group was found more effective (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) than the SST and CG in the variables ASIS (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001), PSIS (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001) and acromion (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in postural variables scapula, acromion-line and line-intertragic notch. In conclusion, the MCT stretching was superior to the SST in treating postural deviations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Chiropractic","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 121-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clch.2012.10.039","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Chiropractic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479235412001186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Muscular Chains Therapy (MCT), which uses postural positions for global stretching, and Segmental Stretch Technique (SST), which stretches one muscle at a time, are two static stretching techniques currently used to improve, correct and treat postural imbalances. Aiming to identify which of these two techniques is most effective in order to improve standing posture, 30 women between 21 and 30 years old were evaluated and divided into three groups of 10 participants each: The SST group, the MCT Group and the Control Group (CG). Postures were evaluated before and after treatment through digital photographs. After transferring the images to the computer, tracings were made with Corel Draw software using six marked anatomical points: intertragic notch; anterior part of the lateral border of the acromion; suprasternal notch; posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS); anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS); the inferior angle of the scapula; and right lateral malleolus. The two experimental groups underwent eight sessions of stretching, twice a week, for about 30 min each session. The MCT Group was found more effective (p < 0.05) than the SST and CG in the variables ASIS (p = 0.001), PSIS (p = 0.001) and acromion (p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in postural variables scapula, acromion-line and line-intertragic notch. In conclusion, the MCT stretching was superior to the SST in treating postural deviations.

改善姿势:比较节段性拉伸和肌肉链疗法
肌链疗法(MCT)和节段拉伸技术(SST)是目前用于改善、纠正和治疗姿势不平衡的两种静态拉伸技术,前者利用体位进行整体拉伸,后者一次拉伸一块肌肉。为了确定这两种技术中哪一种最有效地改善站立姿势,30名21至30岁的女性被分为三组,每组10人:SST组,MCT组和对照组(CG)。通过数码照片评估治疗前后的姿势。将图像传输到计算机后,使用Corel Draw软件使用六个标记的解剖点进行跟踪:悲剧间缺口;肩峰外侧边缘的前部;胸骨上切迹;髂后上棘(PSIS);髂前上棘;肩胛骨的下角;右外踝。两个实验组进行了八次伸展运动,每周两次,每次约30分钟。发现MCT组更有效(p <在变量ASIS (p = 0.001)、PSIS (p = 0.001)和肩峰(p = 0.001)中,SST和CG的差异大于0.05。肩胛骨、肩峰线和线间切迹的体位变量差异无统计学意义。综上所述,MCT拉伸在治疗体位偏差方面优于SST。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信