Quid Pro Quo: Liquidity Insurance in Dealer-Fund Network

Luming Chen
{"title":"Quid Pro Quo: Liquidity Insurance in Dealer-Fund Network","authors":"Luming Chen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3731615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a novel security-level data from SEC on US tri-party repo, this paper investigates how trading relationship impacts liquidity provision within the dealer-fund repo network. This paper documents a unique repo rate dynamic: in normal times, funds charge a premium to dealers with whom they have the strongest trading relationship; in market-wide liquidity shocks, these dealers are rewarded with lower repo rate markup and better immediacy. I exploit the 2016 Money Market Fund Reform as an exogenous liquidity shock to establish a liquidity insurance mechanism. As liquidity insurers are not easily replaceable, shown in the unexpected liquidation case of Charles Schwab Sweep Funds, costly search incentivizes dealers to engage in such stable quid pro quo relationship with money market funds.","PeriodicalId":20999,"journal":{"name":"Regulation of Financial Institutions eJournal","volume":"16 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulation of Financial Institutions eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3731615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using a novel security-level data from SEC on US tri-party repo, this paper investigates how trading relationship impacts liquidity provision within the dealer-fund repo network. This paper documents a unique repo rate dynamic: in normal times, funds charge a premium to dealers with whom they have the strongest trading relationship; in market-wide liquidity shocks, these dealers are rewarded with lower repo rate markup and better immediacy. I exploit the 2016 Money Market Fund Reform as an exogenous liquidity shock to establish a liquidity insurance mechanism. As liquidity insurers are not easily replaceable, shown in the unexpected liquidation case of Charles Schwab Sweep Funds, costly search incentivizes dealers to engage in such stable quid pro quo relationship with money market funds.
交换条件:交易商-基金网络中的流动性保险
本文利用美国证券交易委员会(SEC)关于三方回购的新安全级别数据,研究了交易关系如何影响交易商-基金回购网络中的流动性供应。本文记录了一种独特的回购利率动态:在正常情况下,基金向与其有最强交易关系的交易商收取溢价;在整个市场的流动性冲击中,这些交易商得到的回报是更低的回购利率加价和更好的即时性。本文将2016年货币市场基金改革作为外生流动性冲击,建立流动性保险机制。正如嘉信理财横扫基金意外清算案所显示的那样,流动性保险公司不容易被取代,因此,昂贵的搜索激励交易商与货币市场基金建立这种稳定的交换关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信