Do Futures Premiums Predict Commodity Producer Returns?

Qiao Wang, Ronald J. Balvers
{"title":"Do Futures Premiums Predict Commodity Producer Returns?","authors":"Qiao Wang, Ronald J. Balvers","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3663412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We derive stock returns for firms producing nonrenewable commodities by employing the investment-based asset pricing approach. By identifying the appropriate time-varying discount rate the investment-based approach allows an alternative test of the Hotelling Valuation Principle. The empirical results support the principle and enable predicting returns from sorting firms into quintiles by expected return, producing a 19 percent realized difference between top and bottom quintile. The return differences cannot be explained by standard systematic risk factors, suggesting that at least one important risk factor is missing from standard models. The approach permits cost-of-capital estimation that circumvents identifying systematic risk factors.","PeriodicalId":11495,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Forecasting eJournal","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Forecasting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3663412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We derive stock returns for firms producing nonrenewable commodities by employing the investment-based asset pricing approach. By identifying the appropriate time-varying discount rate the investment-based approach allows an alternative test of the Hotelling Valuation Principle. The empirical results support the principle and enable predicting returns from sorting firms into quintiles by expected return, producing a 19 percent realized difference between top and bottom quintile. The return differences cannot be explained by standard systematic risk factors, suggesting that at least one important risk factor is missing from standard models. The approach permits cost-of-capital estimation that circumvents identifying systematic risk factors.
期货溢价能预测商品生产商的回报吗?
通过采用基于投资的资产定价方法,我们得出了生产不可再生商品的公司的股票收益。通过确定适当的时变折现率,基于投资的方法允许对霍特林估值原则进行另一种测试。实证结果支持这一原则,并能够通过预期回报将公司分成五分位数来预测收益,产生了最高和最低五分位数之间19%的实现差异。收益差异不能用标准的系统风险因素来解释,这表明标准模型中至少缺少一个重要的风险因素。这种方法允许资本成本估算,从而避免识别系统风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信