Mobilizing the psychology evidence base for the treatment of pediatric chronic pain: The development, implementation, and impact of the Comfort Ability Program

Rachael Coakley, Simona Bujoreanu
{"title":"Mobilizing the psychology evidence base for the treatment of pediatric chronic pain: The development, implementation, and impact of the Comfort Ability Program","authors":"Rachael Coakley, Simona Bujoreanu","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past 20 years, our knowledge regarding evidence‐based psychological interventions for pediatric chronic pain has dramatically increased. Unfortunately, access to evidence‐based pain management interventions remains a challenge for many children and adolescents who suffer with persistent pain. Reducing patient burden and system‐level barriers to care are a central target of clinical innovations in pain treatment intervention. Psychological interventions are also increasingly focused on reducing biomedical biases that may inhibit attainment of services. While there are many new psychological interventions across an array of delivery platforms, few interventions have been systematically disseminated. This paper will highlight the translational research procedures that have informed the development and dissemination of the Comfort Ability Program (CAP), an interactive group‐based intervention teaching adolescents and their parents evidence‐based strategies to manage chronic or persistent pain. Now in its fifth year of dissemination, CAP has a demonstrated record of success with cross‐institutional implementation and sustainability at 18 hospitals across three countries. This paper reviews six dynamic and iterative phases of development, based on the Graham et al knowledge‐to‐action cycle (2006), that have guided the implementation and dissemination research for this program. The phases of CAP development include the following: (a) identifying knowledge and clinical gaps in care, (b) generating knowledge assets and implementation procedures, (c) evaluating clinical outcomes and system‐level processes, (d) developing and testing dissemination procedures, (e) expanding partnerships and monitoring knowledge use, and (f) sustaining knowledge use and continued innovation. This paper targets primarily health professionals and administrators and secondarily caregivers and the public at large.","PeriodicalId":19634,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & Neonatal Pain","volume":"123 50","pages":"148 - 159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric & Neonatal Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, our knowledge regarding evidence‐based psychological interventions for pediatric chronic pain has dramatically increased. Unfortunately, access to evidence‐based pain management interventions remains a challenge for many children and adolescents who suffer with persistent pain. Reducing patient burden and system‐level barriers to care are a central target of clinical innovations in pain treatment intervention. Psychological interventions are also increasingly focused on reducing biomedical biases that may inhibit attainment of services. While there are many new psychological interventions across an array of delivery platforms, few interventions have been systematically disseminated. This paper will highlight the translational research procedures that have informed the development and dissemination of the Comfort Ability Program (CAP), an interactive group‐based intervention teaching adolescents and their parents evidence‐based strategies to manage chronic or persistent pain. Now in its fifth year of dissemination, CAP has a demonstrated record of success with cross‐institutional implementation and sustainability at 18 hospitals across three countries. This paper reviews six dynamic and iterative phases of development, based on the Graham et al knowledge‐to‐action cycle (2006), that have guided the implementation and dissemination research for this program. The phases of CAP development include the following: (a) identifying knowledge and clinical gaps in care, (b) generating knowledge assets and implementation procedures, (c) evaluating clinical outcomes and system‐level processes, (d) developing and testing dissemination procedures, (e) expanding partnerships and monitoring knowledge use, and (f) sustaining knowledge use and continued innovation. This paper targets primarily health professionals and administrators and secondarily caregivers and the public at large.
动员儿童慢性疼痛治疗的心理学证据基础:舒适能力计划的发展、实施和影响
在过去的20年里,我们对儿童慢性疼痛的循证心理干预的了解急剧增加。不幸的是,对于许多患有持续性疼痛的儿童和青少年来说,获得基于证据的疼痛管理干预措施仍然是一个挑战。减轻患者负担和系统层面的护理障碍是疼痛治疗干预临床创新的中心目标。心理干预也日益侧重于减少可能阻碍获得服务的生物医学偏见。虽然在一系列交付平台上有许多新的心理干预措施,但很少有干预措施得到系统的传播。本文将重点介绍为舒适能力计划(CAP)的发展和传播提供信息的转化研究程序,CAP是一种基于小组的互动式干预,教导青少年及其父母管理慢性或持续性疼痛的循证策略。现在是CAP传播的第五个年头,它在三个国家的18家医院的跨机构实施和可持续性方面取得了成功的记录。本文基于Graham等人的知识到行动周期(2006),回顾了六个动态和迭代的发展阶段,这些阶段指导了该计划的实施和传播研究。共同计划的发展阶段包括以下几个阶段:(a)确定护理方面的知识和临床差距,(b)产生知识资产和实施程序,(c)评估临床结果和系统级流程,(d)制定和测试传播程序,(e)扩大伙伴关系和监测知识使用,以及(f)维持知识使用和持续创新。本文主要针对卫生专业人员和管理人员和二级护理人员和广大公众。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信