A. Fomichev, V. Poptsov, D. Sirota, M. Zhulkov, A. Edemskiy, А. V. Protopopov, V. Y. Kliver, A. Skokova, A. Chernyavskiy, D. Khvan, K. Agayeva
{"title":"Mid-term and long-term outcomes following heart transplantation with prolonged cold ischemia","authors":"A. Fomichev, V. Poptsov, D. Sirota, M. Zhulkov, A. Edemskiy, А. V. Protopopov, V. Y. Kliver, A. Skokova, A. Chernyavskiy, D. Khvan, K. Agayeva","doi":"10.15825/1995-1191-2023-1-99-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: comparative analysis of long-term outcomes following heart transplantation (HT) with prolonged and short cold ischemia.Materials and methods. We analyzed the data of 29 orthotopic HT with >4 hours of cold ischemia. The transplant surgery was performed at Meshalkin National Medical Research Center between 2013 and the present time. Organs were obtained from donors from other regions. The control group consisted of 29 HTs with cold ischemia <4 hours, performed in the same period. The minimum distance between the transplant center and the donor base was about 250 km (Barnaul); the maximum distance was about 850 km (Krasnoyarsk). Recipient survival and postoperative peculiarities were analyzed.Results. In-hospital survival in the prolonged cold ischemia group was 89.7% (n = 26) with 3 deaths (10.3%). In the second group (<240 min), in-hospital survival was 79.3% (n = 23) with 6 (20.7%) deaths. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no difference between the groups (Log-Rank Test, P 1/4 0.59). In addition, cold ischemia time did not increase the risk of graft rejection and the risk of transplant coronary artery disease (TCAD).Conclusion. HT with cold ischemia >4 hours did not have worse outcomes than in short graft ischemia. This provides grounds for further accumulation of experience in the use of heart donors from remote locations.","PeriodicalId":21400,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2023-1-99-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective: comparative analysis of long-term outcomes following heart transplantation (HT) with prolonged and short cold ischemia.Materials and methods. We analyzed the data of 29 orthotopic HT with >4 hours of cold ischemia. The transplant surgery was performed at Meshalkin National Medical Research Center between 2013 and the present time. Organs were obtained from donors from other regions. The control group consisted of 29 HTs with cold ischemia <4 hours, performed in the same period. The minimum distance between the transplant center and the donor base was about 250 km (Barnaul); the maximum distance was about 850 km (Krasnoyarsk). Recipient survival and postoperative peculiarities were analyzed.Results. In-hospital survival in the prolonged cold ischemia group was 89.7% (n = 26) with 3 deaths (10.3%). In the second group (<240 min), in-hospital survival was 79.3% (n = 23) with 6 (20.7%) deaths. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no difference between the groups (Log-Rank Test, P 1/4 0.59). In addition, cold ischemia time did not increase the risk of graft rejection and the risk of transplant coronary artery disease (TCAD).Conclusion. HT with cold ischemia >4 hours did not have worse outcomes than in short graft ischemia. This provides grounds for further accumulation of experience in the use of heart donors from remote locations.