A 'Toolkit' for Clinical Educators to Foster Learners' Clinical Reasoning and Skills Acquisition

C. Cook
{"title":"A 'Toolkit' for Clinical Educators to Foster Learners' Clinical Reasoning and Skills Acquisition","authors":"C. Cook","doi":"10.36951/ngpxnz.2016.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionTeaching clinical skills, whether at a patient's bedside or in simulated settings, continues to be a mainstay of assisting novice practitioners towards competence and expertise. Quality preceptorship is vital for the retention of new graduates and preceptors' satisfaction (Broadbent, Moxham, Sander, Walker, & Dwyer, 2014; Haggerty, Holloway, & Wilson, 2013; Smedley, Morey, & Race, 2010). The shift of nursing education from hospitals to tertiary settings emphasises theory informing practice (praxis). However, there has not been a matched rigour to ensure that clinical educators engage in sound educational practices when teaching 'hands on' clinical skills. Instead, those undertaking clinical roles such as nurse educators, preceptors or clinical teaching associates, draw primarily from their own tacit knowledge of how to transmit their practice wisdom about skills mastery (Kinchin, Cabot, & Hay, 2009). The 'intuitive' teaching of clinical skills reflects the persistence of a traditional apprenticeship model, whereby learners develop technical competence but might not be able to articulate a critical analysis of whether and why a technique is best practice. Clinical reasoning may lag far behind technical know-how.The focus of this article is the micro-skills of clinical teaching, to make tacit knowledge accessible. There is scant literature that brings together these micro-skills in a way that is readily accessible to nurse educators. What follows is a synthesis of three models and three specific skills, underpinned by theory. Together, these provide a 'toolkit' of teaching approaches, enabling those providing clinical education to plan learners' skills acquisition, maximising efficiency and satisfaction on the part of the educator and the learner. Effective clinical teaching is, of course, also shaped by 'bigger picture' contexts, such as collaboration between clinical institutions and tertiary providers to ensure undergraduate nursing students have optimal learning experiences (see for example Bourgeois, Drayton, & Brown, 2011; Edgecombe & Bowden, 2009). Other important institutional components shape educators' role development. These include an organisational commitment to professional development, mentoring and adequate staffing. Gaberson, Oermann and Shellenbarger (2015) and Rose and Best (2005) usefully provide indepth analyses of the foundations of clinical teaching.BackgroundThe classic work of Patricia Benner, From novice to expert (1984), drew from the work of Dreyfus and Dreyfus (1986) in explaining the progression of novice nurses to becoming expert practitioners. Benner emphasised the importance of novices learning alongside experts. Despite the considerable influence of her research, which shapes the Nursing Council of New Zealand Competencies for Registered Nurses (2012), her early work pays limited attention to the details of how experts transmit knowledge of clinical skills and enable learners to blend holistically psychomotor skills, human interactions and adaptation to the instability of patients' needs and wishes. Significantly, Benner proposed that expert nurses' work is fluid and becomes ordinary to these practitioners to the extent that they are not consciously aware of what makes up their craft. Field (2004) provides a valuable critique of Benner's work. She contends that greater efficiency in the shift from novice to expert is facilitated by educational support of mentors, rather than accepting that practical know-how is for the most part acquired tacitly.In a recent study, Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, and Day's (2010) overview of clinical teaching addresses contextual factors related to learning skills, rather than explicitly concentrating on stages or frameworks for the acquisition process per se. Benner et al. identify that professional practice excellence develops out of a synthesis of three 'apprenticeships'; intellectual, practical and ethical. …","PeriodicalId":77298,"journal":{"name":"Nursing praxis in New Zealand inc","volume":"20 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing praxis in New Zealand inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36951/ngpxnz.2016.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

IntroductionTeaching clinical skills, whether at a patient's bedside or in simulated settings, continues to be a mainstay of assisting novice practitioners towards competence and expertise. Quality preceptorship is vital for the retention of new graduates and preceptors' satisfaction (Broadbent, Moxham, Sander, Walker, & Dwyer, 2014; Haggerty, Holloway, & Wilson, 2013; Smedley, Morey, & Race, 2010). The shift of nursing education from hospitals to tertiary settings emphasises theory informing practice (praxis). However, there has not been a matched rigour to ensure that clinical educators engage in sound educational practices when teaching 'hands on' clinical skills. Instead, those undertaking clinical roles such as nurse educators, preceptors or clinical teaching associates, draw primarily from their own tacit knowledge of how to transmit their practice wisdom about skills mastery (Kinchin, Cabot, & Hay, 2009). The 'intuitive' teaching of clinical skills reflects the persistence of a traditional apprenticeship model, whereby learners develop technical competence but might not be able to articulate a critical analysis of whether and why a technique is best practice. Clinical reasoning may lag far behind technical know-how.The focus of this article is the micro-skills of clinical teaching, to make tacit knowledge accessible. There is scant literature that brings together these micro-skills in a way that is readily accessible to nurse educators. What follows is a synthesis of three models and three specific skills, underpinned by theory. Together, these provide a 'toolkit' of teaching approaches, enabling those providing clinical education to plan learners' skills acquisition, maximising efficiency and satisfaction on the part of the educator and the learner. Effective clinical teaching is, of course, also shaped by 'bigger picture' contexts, such as collaboration between clinical institutions and tertiary providers to ensure undergraduate nursing students have optimal learning experiences (see for example Bourgeois, Drayton, & Brown, 2011; Edgecombe & Bowden, 2009). Other important institutional components shape educators' role development. These include an organisational commitment to professional development, mentoring and adequate staffing. Gaberson, Oermann and Shellenbarger (2015) and Rose and Best (2005) usefully provide indepth analyses of the foundations of clinical teaching.BackgroundThe classic work of Patricia Benner, From novice to expert (1984), drew from the work of Dreyfus and Dreyfus (1986) in explaining the progression of novice nurses to becoming expert practitioners. Benner emphasised the importance of novices learning alongside experts. Despite the considerable influence of her research, which shapes the Nursing Council of New Zealand Competencies for Registered Nurses (2012), her early work pays limited attention to the details of how experts transmit knowledge of clinical skills and enable learners to blend holistically psychomotor skills, human interactions and adaptation to the instability of patients' needs and wishes. Significantly, Benner proposed that expert nurses' work is fluid and becomes ordinary to these practitioners to the extent that they are not consciously aware of what makes up their craft. Field (2004) provides a valuable critique of Benner's work. She contends that greater efficiency in the shift from novice to expert is facilitated by educational support of mentors, rather than accepting that practical know-how is for the most part acquired tacitly.In a recent study, Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, and Day's (2010) overview of clinical teaching addresses contextual factors related to learning skills, rather than explicitly concentrating on stages or frameworks for the acquisition process per se. Benner et al. identify that professional practice excellence develops out of a synthesis of three 'apprenticeships'; intellectual, practical and ethical. …
临床教育工作者培养学习者临床推理和技能习得的“工具包”
教授临床技能,无论是在病人的床边还是在模拟环境中,仍然是帮助新手从业者获得能力和专业知识的主要支柱。高质量的导师制对于留住新毕业生和导师制满意度至关重要(Broadbent, Moxham, Sander, Walker, & Dwyer, 2014;哈格蒂、霍洛韦和威尔逊,2013;Smedley, Morey, & Race, 2010)。护理教育从医院到高等院校的转变强调理论告知实践(实践)。然而,在教授“动手”临床技能时,没有相应的严格性来确保临床教育者参与良好的教育实践。相反,那些承担临床角色的人,如护士教育者、导师或临床教学助理,主要从他们自己的隐性知识中汲取如何传播他们关于技能掌握的实践智慧(Kinchin, Cabot, & Hay, 2009)。临床技能的“直观”教学反映了传统学徒模式的持续存在,即学习者发展技术能力,但可能无法对技术是否以及为什么是最佳实践进行批判性分析。临床推理可能远远落后于技术诀窍。本文的重点是临床微技能教学,使隐性知识触手可及。很少有文献将这些微技能以一种易于护理教育者使用的方式结合在一起。接下来是三种模式和三种特定技能的综合,以理论为基础。总之,这些提供了一个教学方法的“工具包”,使那些提供临床教育的人能够计划学习者的技能习得,最大限度地提高教育工作者和学习者的效率和满意度。当然,有效的临床教学也受到“大局”背景的影响,例如临床机构和高等教育提供者之间的合作,以确保本科护理学生获得最佳的学习体验(例如Bourgeois, Drayton, & Brown, 2011;Edgecombe & Bowden, 2009)。其他重要的制度组成部分塑造了教育者的角色发展。其中包括对专业发展、指导和充足人员配备的组织承诺。Gaberson, Oermann和Shellenbarger(2015)以及Rose和Best(2005)对临床教学的基础进行了深入的分析。帕特里夏·本纳(Patricia Benner)的经典著作《从新手到专家》(1984)借鉴了德雷福斯和德雷福斯(1986)在解释新手护士从成为专家执业者的过程中的工作。Benner强调了新手与专家一起学习的重要性。尽管她的研究产生了相当大的影响,塑造了新西兰注册护士能力护理委员会(2012年),但她的早期工作对专家如何传播临床技能知识的细节关注有限,并使学习者能够全面融合精神运动技能,人际互动以及适应患者需求和愿望的不稳定性。值得注意的是,Benner提出,专业护士的工作是流动的,对这些从业者来说变得普通,以至于他们没有意识到是什么构成了他们的手艺。Field(2004)对Benner的工作提出了有价值的批评。她认为,在从新手到专家的转变过程中,导师的教育支持有助于提高效率,而不是接受实践知识在很大程度上是隐性获得的这一观点。在最近的一项研究中,Benner, Sutphen, Leonard和Day(2010)对临床教学的概述解决了与学习技能相关的情境因素,而不是明确地关注习得过程本身的阶段或框架。Benner等人认为,卓越的专业实践是由三种“学徒制”的综合发展而来的;聪明,务实,有道德。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信