The clarity and correctness of visualized thrust actions: a description and insights from users and experts

IF 1.2 2区 文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Ielka Van der sluis, Gabriela Matouskova, Hannah Niemeier, Sophia Popp, Josephine Carstens
{"title":"The clarity and correctness of visualized thrust actions: a description and insights from users and experts","authors":"Ielka Van der sluis, Gabriela Matouskova, Hannah Niemeier, Sophia Popp, Josephine Carstens","doi":"10.1177/14703572221135240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents three studies that evaluate the effectiveness of instructional pictures that visualize Heimlich maneuver thrusts. Firstly, a corpus study is used to describe a collection of 30 pictures employing a model in which the angle, perspective, body and hand positions of the first-aid helper and the victim, the thrust action and its depicted results are analysed. Results show a large variation in the visualizations of the same action. Secondly, 56 potential users of the pictures filled out a questionnaire to evaluate the clarity and correctness with which the action is displayed in five representative pictures from the corpus with Heimlich’s description of the thrust action as a reference. Results showed that the pictures were considered far from perfect. In particular, the clarity of the visualization of the helper applying pressure on the abdomen of the victim was considered the least clear and incorrect. Thirdly, six certified first-aid instructors gave their expert opinions on the five pictures. Their comments concentrate on the location of the hands which are depicted dangerously high on the front of the victim. These studies advance the annotation and evaluation methodologies for the investigation of visualized actions. Results serve authoring and analysis of multimodal instructions.","PeriodicalId":51671,"journal":{"name":"Visual Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572221135240","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents three studies that evaluate the effectiveness of instructional pictures that visualize Heimlich maneuver thrusts. Firstly, a corpus study is used to describe a collection of 30 pictures employing a model in which the angle, perspective, body and hand positions of the first-aid helper and the victim, the thrust action and its depicted results are analysed. Results show a large variation in the visualizations of the same action. Secondly, 56 potential users of the pictures filled out a questionnaire to evaluate the clarity and correctness with which the action is displayed in five representative pictures from the corpus with Heimlich’s description of the thrust action as a reference. Results showed that the pictures were considered far from perfect. In particular, the clarity of the visualization of the helper applying pressure on the abdomen of the victim was considered the least clear and incorrect. Thirdly, six certified first-aid instructors gave their expert opinions on the five pictures. Their comments concentrate on the location of the hands which are depicted dangerously high on the front of the victim. These studies advance the annotation and evaluation methodologies for the investigation of visualized actions. Results serve authoring and analysis of multimodal instructions.
可视化推力动作的清晰度和正确性:来自用户和专家的描述和见解
本文提出了三个研究,评估教学图片可视化海姆利克手法推力的有效性。首先,采用语料库研究方法描述了一组30张图片,采用一个模型,其中急救人员和受害者的角度、视角、身体和手的位置、推力动作及其描绘结果进行了分析。结果显示,同一动作的视觉效果有很大差异。其次,56位图片的潜在用户填写了一份问卷,以海姆利克对插入动作的描述为参考,评估语料库中5张代表性图片中动作显示的清晰性和正确性。结果显示,这些照片被认为远非完美。特别是,清晰的可视化助手施加压力的受害者的腹部被认为是最不清晰和不正确的。第三,六位经过认证的急救教练对这五张图片给出了他们的专家意见。他们的评论集中在双手的位置上,这些手被描绘得高高在上,非常危险。这些研究为可视化行为的研究提供了注释和评价方法。结果为多模态指令的编写和分析提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Visual Communication
Visual Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Visual Communication provides an international forum for the growing body of work in numerous interrelated disciplines. Its broad coverage includes: still and moving images; graphic design and typography; visual phenomena such as fashion, professional vision, posture and interaction; the built and landscaped environment; the role of the visual in relation to language, music, sound and action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信